Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Briarmeadow Charter School in Houston, TX
(PK-08 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 98
Address
 3601 DUNVALE
Houston, TX 77063
Telephone
(713) 458-5500
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.houstonisd.org
City-data.com school rating
98
Students
608
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
35.9
Free lunch eligible students
321
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
61
School district
HOUSTON ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
Briarmeadow Charter School:

98
KIPP SHARP COLLEGE PREP (0.1 miles):

91
KIPP SHARPSTOWN COLLEGE PREPARATORY (0.2 miles):

73
DRAW ACADEMY UPPER EL (0.4 miles):

46
PINEY POINT EL (0.5 miles):

21
SOUTHWEST MIDDLE SCH (1.1 miles):

19
SOUTHWEST H S (1.1 miles):

13
WISDOM H S (0.8 miles):

8
LIBERTY H S (0.8 miles):

3
Briarmeadow Charter School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Harris County:

51
Houston:

47
Briarmeadow Charter School:

98

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 608
Enrollment in 2015: 611
Enrollment in 2014: 603
Enrollment in 2013: 595
Enrollment in 2012: 590
Enrollment in 2011: 135
Enrollment in 2010: 135
Enrollment in 2009: 135
Enrollment in 2008: 123
Enrollment in 2007: 110
Enrollment in 2006: 121
Enrollment in 2005: 106
Enrollment in 2004: 89
Enrollment in 2003: 66
Enrollment in 2002: 37

Briarmeadow Charter School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05G06G07G08Total
All students44667072737672474741608
Female students26393731354240202320313
Male students18273341383432272421295
American Indian/Alaska Native students111 - - - - - - - 3
Asian students131812121412139129124
Hispanic students7202431264130262323251
Black students8586108813259
White students121922192213191175149
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students - 1 - - - - - - - - 1
Two or More Races students3234122 - 2221

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 44
Kindergarten enrollment: 66
1st grade enrollment: 70
2nd grade enrollment: 72
3rd grade enrollment: 73
4th grade enrollment: 76
5th grade enrollment: 72
6th grade enrollment: 47
7th grade enrollment: 47
8th grade enrollment: 41

Briarmeadow Charter School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 313 (51.5%)
Briarmeadow Charter School:

51.5%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 295 (48.5%)
Here:

48.5%
Texas:

50.1%

Briarmeadow Charter School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 3 (0.5%)
School:

0.5%
Texas:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 124 (20.4%)
Briarmeadow Charter School:

20.4%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 251 (41.3%)
Here:

41.3%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 59 (9.7%)
School:

9.7%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 149 (24.5%)
Briarmeadow Charter School:

24.5%
State:

32.3%
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 1 (0.2%)
Briarmeadow Charter School:

0.2%
State:

0.1%
Two or More Races enrollment: 21 (3.5%)
Here:

3.5%
State:

2.1%

Briarmeadow Charter School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 382 (62.8%)
Briarmeadow Charter School:

62.8%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 321 (52.8%)
Briarmeadow Charter School:

52.8%
Texas:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 61 (10.0%)
Here:

10.0%
State:

6.2%

Briarmeadow Charter School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 35.9

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 3
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 26
Number of FTE nurses: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

16.9
Texas:

15.6

Briarmeadow Charter School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $2,262,514
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 39.9 (Salary Expenditures: $1,938,965)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 7 (Salary Expenditures: $20,680)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 5 (Salary Expenditures: $32)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 10 (Salary Expenditures: $302,837)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $685,224
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $2,559,061
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $2,154,122
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 14 (Salary Expenditures: $102,070)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 5 (Salary Expenditures: $32)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 10 (Salary Expenditures: $302,837)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $737,900

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic67
  • American Indian4
  • Asian46
  • Black7
  • White40
  • Multirace4
  • IDEA7
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 168 (male: 75, female: 93)
  • Hispanic: 67 (male: 29, female: 38)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Asian: 46 (male: 20, female: 26)
  • Black: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • White: 40 (male: 17, female: 23)
  • Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.

    Students with disabilities served under IDEA

  • Hispanic20
  • Asian4
  • White8
  • LEP4
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 32 (male: 21, female: 11)
  • Hispanic: 20 (male: 13, female: 7)
  • Asian: 4 (all male)
  • White: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (all male)

    Students with disabilities served under Section 504

  • Hispanic10
  • Asian2
  • Black2
  • White5
  • Multirace2
  • LEP4
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 21 (male: 16, female: 5)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 5 (all male)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,201 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 2 (all female)
  • Asian: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
Briarmeadow Charter School:

3.0%
Texas:

5.2%
Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
  • Section 504: 2 (all male)

Percent of 1st grade students retained
Briarmeadow Charter School:

5.7%
Texas:

6.1%

    Total number of students retained in 2nd grade

  • Hispanic4
  • Asian2
  • White2
  • LEP4
Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 8 (male: 6, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
Here:

11.1%
Texas:

4.8%

    Total number of students retained in 3rd grade

  • White2
  • Multirace2
  • LEP2
  • 5042
Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 4 (all male)
  • White: 2
  • Two or More Races: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
  • Section 504: 2

Percent of 3rd grade students retained
Briarmeadow Charter School:

5.5%
Texas:

4.1%
Total number of students retained in 4th grade: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2

Percent of 4th grade students retained
Briarmeadow Charter School:

2.6%
State:

3.6%
Total number of students retained in 5th grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Asian: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of 5th grade students retained
School:

5.6%
Texas:

4.3%

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic55
  • Asian43
  • Black7
  • White31
  • Multirace7
  • LEP7
  • IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 143 (male: 70, female: 73)
  • Hispanic: 55 (male: 23, female: 32)
  • Asian: 43 (male: 26, female: 17)
  • Black: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • White: 31 (male: 14, female: 17)
  • Two or More Races: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
School:

235.2
Texas:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
End-of-course (EOC)

    Algebra I Average Scale Score

  • All4,481
  • Males4,442
  • Females4,522
  • Hispanic4,415
  • Asian4,531
  • White4,658
Algebra I Average Scale Score:

4,481
State:

4,001
Algebra I students tested: 45
Algebra I # Answer Documents Submitted: 45

Algebra I Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 8.3 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.1 (84%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.5 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9 (82%)
  • Reporting Category 5: 5.4 (90%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 0%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 36%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 64%

36%
64%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,442, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 65%)
35%
65%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,522, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 64%)
36%
64%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,415, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 58%)
42%
58%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,531, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 63%)
37%
63%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,658, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 89%)
11%
89%
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,473
  • Males1,459
  • Females1,484
  • Hispanic1,420
  • Asian1,542
  • Black1,500
  • White1,504
  • Multirace1,424
Math Average Scale Score:

1,473
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 73
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 73

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.9 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.7 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.1 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.6 (66%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 34%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

21%
34%
24%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,459, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 24%)
27%
37%
12%
24%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,484, Tested: 40, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 18%)
15%
32%
35%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,420, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 8%)
27%
46%
19%
8%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,542, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 46%, Masters: 31%)
15%
8%
46%
31%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,500, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 29%)
14%
43%
14%
29%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,504, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 29%)
14%
29%
28%
29%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,424, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 20%)
40%
40%
20%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,428
  • Males1,417
  • Females1,437
  • Hispanic1,363
  • Asian1,482
  • Black1,434
  • White1,485
  • Multirace1,408
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,428
Texas:

1,423
Reading students tested: 73
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 73

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.7 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.4 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.6 (61%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 40%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 12%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

27%
40%
12%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,417, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 39%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 3%, Masters: 24%)
39%
34%
3%
24%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,437, Tested: 40, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 18%)
18%
45%
20%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,363, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 8%)
38%
47%
7%
8%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,482, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 31%)
8%
46%
15%
31%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,434, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 29%)
43%
28%
29%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,485, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 33%)
19%
29%
19%
33%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,408, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
20%
60%
20%
4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,546
  • Males1,525
  • Females1,579
  • Hispanic1,495
  • Asian1,633
  • Black1,472
  • White1,567
Math Average Scale Score:

1,546
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 67
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 67

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.1 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.8 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.3 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.4 (60%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 37%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 22%

24%
37%
17%
22%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,525, Tested: 41, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 17%)
32%
39%
12%
17%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,579, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 31%)
12%
34%
23%
31%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,495, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 15%)
35%
38%
12%
15%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,633, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 41%)
6%
29%
24%
41%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,472, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 0%)
50%
37%
13%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,567, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 21%)
14%
43%
22%
21%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,520
  • Males1,494
  • Females1,560
  • Hispanic1,486
  • Asian1,543
  • Black1,467
  • White1,577
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,520
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 66
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 67

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.3 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.2 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.9 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 27%

27%
26%
20%
27%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,494, Tested: 40, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 23%)
30%
32%
15%
23%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,560, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 35%)
23%
15%
27%
35%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,486, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 15%)
31%
34%
20%
15%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,543, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 29%)
24%
23%
24%
29%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,467, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 14%)
43%
14%
29%
14%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,577, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 50%)
14%
22%
14%
50%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,691
  • Males3,530
  • Females3,938
  • Hispanic3,480
  • Asian3,878
  • Black3,631
  • White3,810
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,691
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 66
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 66

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.8 (48%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.2 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.5 (66%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 17%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 33%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 6%

44%
17%
33%
6%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,530, Tested: 40, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 55%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 0%)
55%
17%
28%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,938, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 15%)
27%
15%
43%
15%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,480, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 65%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 4%)
65%
8%
23%
4%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 3,878, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 6%)
19%
25%
50%
6%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,631, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 63%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 0%)
63%
38%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,810, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 7%)
29%
28%
36%
7%
5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,645
  • Males1,661
  • Females1,631
  • Hispanic1,614
  • Asian1,694
  • Black1,614
  • White1,664
Math Average Scale Score:

1,645
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 69
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 69

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.1 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.1 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.6 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.6 (66%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 29%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 32%

7%
32%
29%
32%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,661, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 33%)
33%
34%
33%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,631, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 31%)
14%
30%
25%
31%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,614, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 24%)
16%
36%
24%
24%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,694, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 58%)
25%
17%
58%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,614, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 13%)
50%
37%
13%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,664, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 35%)
4%
26%
35%
35%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,586
  • Males1,590
  • Females1,584
  • Hispanic1,556
  • Asian1,579
  • Black1,582
  • White1,619
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,586
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 69
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 69

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.9 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.7 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 40%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 17%

13%
30%
40%
17%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,590, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 15%)
9%
39%
37%
15%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,584, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 19%)
17%
22%
42%
19%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,556, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 16%)
20%
28%
36%
16%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,579, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 8%)
8%
34%
50%
8%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,582, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 0%)
13%
38%
50%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,619, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 26%)
9%
30%
35%
26%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,749
  • Males3,811
  • Females3,691
  • Hispanic3,614
  • Asian3,815
  • Black3,673
  • White3,865
Science Average Scale Score:

3,749
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 69
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 69

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.4 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.3 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8 (67%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 49%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 7%

26%
49%
18%
7%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,811, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 52%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 6%)
18%
52%
24%
6%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,691, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 48%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 8%)
33%
48%
11%
8%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,614, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 4%)
36%
44%
16%
4%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 3,815, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 8%)
25%
42%
25%
8%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,673, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 75%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
25%
75%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,865, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 53%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 13%)
17%
53%
17%
13%
6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,848
  • Males1,846
  • Females1,851
  • Hispanic1,824
  • Asian1,872
  • Black1,889
  • White1,854
Math Average Scale Score:

1,848
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 49
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 49

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 8.7 (87%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.8 (86%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.2 (87%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 6.2 (89%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 4%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 16%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 80%

4%
16%
80%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,846, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 78%)
22%
78%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,851, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 81%)
8%
11%
81%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,824, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 4%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 79%)
4%
17%
79%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,872, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 83%)
17%
83%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,889, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 71%)
29%
71%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,854, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 80%)
10%
10%
80%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,693
  • Males1,674
  • Females1,710
  • Hispanic1,671
  • Asian1,738
  • Black1,683
  • White1,717
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,693
State:

1,457
Reading students tested: 49
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 49

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.6 (82%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 14 (83%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.1 (81%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 23%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 30%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 41%

6%
23%
30%
41%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,674, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 35%)
9%
34%
22%
35%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,710, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 46%)
4%
11%
39%
46%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,671, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 29%)
29%
42%
29%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,738, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 67%)
33%
67%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,683, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 43%)
29%
14%
14%
43%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,717, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 50%)
10%
10%
30%
50%
7th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,849
  • Males1,863
  • Females1,839
  • Hispanic1,839
  • Asian1,924
  • White1,825
Math Average Scale Score:

1,849
Texas:

1,571
Math students tested: 42
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 43

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.7 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.6 (84%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.8 (90%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 5.5 (79%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 2%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 79%

2%
19%
79%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,863, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 88%)
12%
88%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,839, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 4%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 72%)
4%
24%
72%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,839, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 89%)
11%
89%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,924, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 80%)
20%
80%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,825, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 70%)
30%
70%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,822
  • Males1,821
  • Females1,822
  • Hispanic1,821
  • Asian1,864
  • White1,799
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,822
Texas:

1,550
Reading students tested: 42
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 43

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7 (88%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 15.9 (88%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 14.1 (88%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 0%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 76%

24%
76%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,821, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 82%)
18%
82%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,822, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 72%)
28%
72%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,821, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 79%)
21%
79%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,864, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 90%)
10%
90%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,799, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 60%)
40%
60%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All4,778
  • Males4,767
  • Females4,786
  • Hispanic4,689
  • Asian4,972
  • White4,872
Writing Average Scale Score:

4,778
State:

3,515
Writing students tested: 43
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 44

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 12.3 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.5 (89%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 14.9 (87%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 5%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 70%

5%
25%
70%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,767, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 6%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 76%)
6%
18%
76%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,786, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 4%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 65%)
4%
31%
65%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,689, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 5%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 68%)
5%
27%
68%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,972, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 70%)
30%
70%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,872, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 82%)
9%
9%
82%
8th Grade
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 44

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,801
  • Males1,776
  • Females1,827
  • Hispanic1,802
  • Asian1,789
  • White1,808
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,801
Texas:

1,561
Reading students tested: 45
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 45

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.9 (86%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 16.2 (85%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 15 (88%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 11%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 64%

11%
25%
64%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,776, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 57%)
17%
26%
57%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,827, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 5%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 73%)
5%
22%
73%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,802, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 63%)
12%
25%
63%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,789, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 63%)
12%
25%
63%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,808, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 67%)
33%
67%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All4,416
  • Males4,348
  • Females4,486
  • Hispanic4,284
  • Asian4,554
  • White4,839
Science Average Scale Score:

4,416
Texas:

3,634
Science students tested: 45
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 45

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 8.9 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.5 (83%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.3 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9.1 (83%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 20%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 31%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 49%

20%
31%
49%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,348, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 43%)
17%
40%
43%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,486, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 55%)
23%
22%
55%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,284, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 42%)
21%
37%
42%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,554, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 50%)
12%
38%
50%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,839, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 78%)
11%
11%
78%

    Social Studies Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All4,176
  • Males4,112
  • Females4,242
  • Hispanic4,075
  • Asian4,229
  • White4,407
Social Studies Average Scale Score:

4,176
State:

3,461
Social Studies students tested: 45
Social Studies # Answer Documents Submitted: 45

Social Studies Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 13.4 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.3 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.5 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 5.6 (80%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 31%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 42%

31%
27%
42%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,112, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 30%)
43%
27%
30%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,242, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 55%)
18%
27%
55%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,075, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 29%)
37%
34%
29%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,229, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 63%)
25%
12%
63%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,407, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 67%)
22%
11%
67%

Health & Safety


Referrals and Arrests:
Show data for

(State average from 1,516 schools)
Referral to law enforcement is an action by which a student is reported to any law enforcement agency or official, including a school police unit, for an incident that occurs on school grounds, during school-related events, or while taking school transportation, regardless of whether official action is taken. Citations, tickets, court referrals, and school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.

School-related arrest refers to an arrest of a student for any activity conducted on school grounds, during off-campus school activities (including while taking school transportation), or due to a referral by any school official. All school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official per 1,000 students
School:

3.3
State:

30.4

Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic4
  • Asian4
  • Black2
  • White2
  • Multirace2
  • LEP2
  • IDEA4
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 14 (male: 6, female: 8)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2 (all female)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Briarmeadow Charter School:

23.0
State:

147.9

Restraint and Seclusion:
Show data for

(State average from 2,148 schools)
Physical restraint refers to a personal restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move his or her torso, arms, legs, or head freely. The term physical restraint does not include a physical escort. Physical escort means a temporary touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder or back for the purpose of inducing a student who is acting out to walk to a safe location.
Total Number of students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
School:

3.3
Texas:

6.8

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 3

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)
School:

4.9
Texas:

27.5

Classes & Courses


Algebra I:
Show data for

(State average from 1,291 schools)
Algebra I is a (college-preparatory) course that includes the study of properties and operations of the real number system; evaluating rational algebraic expressions; solving and graphing first degree equations and inequalities; translating word problems into equations; operations with and factoring of polynomials; and solving simple quadratic equations. Algebra I is a foundation course leading to higher-level mathematics courses, including Geometry and Algebra II.

    8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I

  • Hispanic22
  • Asian10
  • Black2
  • White4
  • Multirace2
8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 40 (male: 20, female: 20)
  • Hispanic: 22 (male: 8, female: 14)
  • Asian: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I: 34 (male: 21, female: 13)
  • Hispanic: 23 (male: 10, female: 13)
  • Asian: 7 (all male)
  • White: 4 (all male)
Percent of 8th grade students who passed
Here:

85.0%
Texas:

87.0%

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Houston, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Houston main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Briarmeadow Charter School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents