Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-18-2024, 08:38 AM
 
Location: Houston
5,638 posts, read 4,963,757 times
Reputation: 4562

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dopo View Post
We can make the same comment ... the fast speed train can be used by everyone
By freight and other commercial carriers?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-18-2024, 08:42 AM
 
18,140 posts, read 25,330,929 times
Reputation: 16861
If we are going to be concerned about farmers and their land
today we wouldn't have an interstate highway system
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2024, 08:48 AM
 
Location: Was Midvalley Oregon; Now Eastside Seattle area
13,083 posts, read 7,557,182 times
Reputation: 9830
just returned from Europe.
Even the local trains are fast, and smooth.
The problem I found is that Europe had too many trains, arriving and leaving on-time.
YTmV
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2024, 10:27 AM
 
6,706 posts, read 5,955,418 times
Reputation: 17076
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dopo View Post
If we are going to be concerned about farmers and their land
today we wouldn't have an interstate highway system
It's a shame Eisenhower didn't push a national high speed rail system back in the '50s, before NIMBY lawsuits blocked every advance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2024, 10:34 AM
bu2
 
24,116 posts, read 14,934,661 times
Reputation: 12982
Quote:
Originally Posted by LocalPlanner View Post
While they certainly helped kill the original proposal in the 1990s, when they had hourly flights, I'm not sure they view the HOU-DAL corridor the same way now.
No. It doesn't bother them at all. They make more money on longer distance flights.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2024, 10:37 AM
bu2
 
24,116 posts, read 14,934,661 times
Reputation: 12982
I think what has made the project dormant is the office market. They were going to profit off commercial office construction at their Houston and Dallas hubs. But the commercial real estate market is reeling from remote work. The remote work also reduces the amount of business travel.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2024, 01:51 PM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,029 posts, read 14,241,458 times
Reputation: 16762
Quote:
Originally Posted by blisterpeanuts View Post
It's a shame Eisenhower didn't push a national high speed rail system back in the '50s, before NIMBY lawsuits blocked every advance.
You may be surprised to learn that destroying rail passenger service was a national priority.
Ditto, for the prior destruction of urban and interurban passenger service.
The Hegemony of Special Interests actively collaborated with governments, local, state and federal, to eradicate the most efficient form of land transport.
To this day, any "subsidized" rail project is warped by partisan politics to be a pork barrel disaster, that critics can point the finger of blame... Like the HSR in California.

It's no coincidence.

Why, you ask?
By 1882, the Pennsylvania Railroad had become the largest railroad (by traffic and revenue), the largest transportation enterprise, and the largest corporation in the world. Its budget was second only to the U.S. government. (That was just one railroad company!)
It went bankrupt in 1970, thanks to the government’s meddling, taxes, and ridiculous regulations, and was split off into Conrail and Amtrak (wholly owned by the federal government).
Privately owned rail represented a power bloc that rankled (or threatened) partisan politicians... and their competitors.

"What's good for GM is good for America."
GM was once the world's biggest corporation. By sales, it was the largest automaker in the United States in 2022, and was the largest in the world for 77 years before losing the top spot to Toyota in 2008.

SEE: Taken for a Ride (documentary)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-I8GDklsN4


Another example of deliberate destruction was the loss of "mail by rail" contracts in 1967. That one change ended the profitability of passenger trains to smaller markets. And the replacement, the "Zone Improvement Program" (ZIP codes!), wound up costing more, requiring far more energy, and taking longer. That's how we got "snail mail" instead of overnight mail (via Postal Rail cars). Leave it to gubmint to really stick it to the sheeple.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2024, 12:20 PM
 
Location: Orange County, CA USA
783 posts, read 512,943 times
Reputation: 1198
Just hope it's not planned and administered by the same bozos that did the CA train. That was a complete and utter cluster. They'd build a little chunk here, a smidgen there, none of it connected to anything, all of it astronomically expensive and a waste of time, money and resources. I have no doubt that some people get very, very rich over it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2024, 02:06 PM
 
11,852 posts, read 8,070,074 times
Reputation: 10020
Quote:
Originally Posted by bu2 View Post
I think what has made the project dormant is the office market. They were going to profit off commercial office construction at their Houston and Dallas hubs. But the commercial real estate market is reeling from remote work. The remote work also reduces the amount of business travel.
Personally I think they should just standardize remote work and convert office space into living space with retail and restaurants. That would help with housing affordability in the rental market atleast.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2024, 02:12 PM
 
Location: Houston/Austin, TX
9,941 posts, read 6,655,141 times
Reputation: 6452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Need4Camaro View Post
Personally I think they should just standardize remote work and convert office space into living space with retail and restaurants. That would help with housing affordability in the rental market atleast.
Remote work is the future whether people like it or not. There’s going to be years of adjustment. We rushed into it too fast with Covid and are now having a more realistic transition. But that’s where we are headed
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top