Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > South Carolina
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-22-2023, 06:13 AM
 
Location: Charleston, South Carolina
12,882 posts, read 18,736,837 times
Reputation: 3116

Advertisements

June 2023’s figures:

https://dew.sc.gov/sites/dew/files/D...se%20Final.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-22-2023, 08:53 AM
Status: "dreaming of Glacier National Park" (set 8 days ago)
 
721 posts, read 341,550 times
Reputation: 238
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlestondata View Post

BTW - different topic - There’s a subscribers-only article in The Greenville News today titled “Black Professionals in Greenville Discuss Impact of Lack of Diversity.” I’m not a subscriber, but the title indicates that perhaps Charleston’s not the only place that could be picked apart on this issue. Why 37,000 net Blacks to metro Greenville since 2000 versus minus 300 in metro Charleston? Cost of living? The opportunity to sell out for high real estate prices? Good questions.


https://www.dew.sc.gov/sites/dew/fil...se%20Final.pdf
I would say the focus on diversity is silly. For example, nobody talks about diversity being important in college and pro football and basketball.

Most colleges have dropped SAT score requirement in the name of diversity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2023, 12:14 PM
 
2,306 posts, read 2,954,991 times
Reputation: 560
July data on BLS is out

Charleston's up to 438k in the labor force and 425k employed (up 30k and 29k respectively since January's data)
Greenville's up to 457k in the labor force and 445k employed (up 17k and 15k respectively since January)
Spartanburg's up to 177k in the labor force and 166k employed (up 7k and 6k respectively)
Columbia's up to 416k in the labor force and 402k employed (up 16k and 15k respectively)

hmmmm not counting Spartanburg Charleston might actually surpass Greenville sometime next year at this pace seeing as it's growing at nearly double the rate
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2023, 05:02 AM
 
Location: Charleston, South Carolina
12,882 posts, read 18,736,837 times
Reputation: 3116
What can Charleston-North Charleston say?

https://dew.sc.gov/sites/dew/files/D...se%20Final.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2023, 11:45 AM
Status: "dreaming of Glacier National Park" (set 8 days ago)
 
721 posts, read 341,550 times
Reputation: 238
Looks like the number of government jobs increased but manufacturing is negative. "Leisure and
Hospitality" increased by 8,300.

Is there any data that breaks out the percentage of government and private sector jobs for each metro?

Last edited by LakeMan45; 10-21-2023 at 11:53 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2023, 02:18 PM
 
Location: Charleston, South Carolina
12,882 posts, read 18,736,837 times
Reputation: 3116
I’d google it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2023, 01:40 PM
Status: "dreaming of Glacier National Park" (set 8 days ago)
 
721 posts, read 341,550 times
Reputation: 238
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ledmonkey View Post
July data on BLS is out

Charleston's up to 438k in the labor force and 425k employed (up 30k and 29k respectively since January's data)
Greenville's up to 457k in the labor force and 445k employed (up 17k and 15k respectively since January)
Spartanburg's up to 177k in the labor force and 166k employed (up 7k and 6k respectively)
Columbia's up to 416k in the labor force and 402k employed (up 16k and 15k respectively)

hmmmm not counting Spartanburg Charleston might actually surpass Greenville sometime next year at this pace seeing as it's growing at nearly double the rate
It seems like if you detach Spartanburg from Greenville, you also have to detach N. Charleston from Charleston. Most of the industry in the Charleston metro is in North Charleston.

Charleston's job market seems to be mostly education, hospital and hospitality / tourism.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2023, 04:55 PM
 
37,875 posts, read 41,896,305 times
Reputation: 27266
Quote:
Originally Posted by LakeMan45 View Post
It seems like if you detach Spartanburg from Greenville, you also have to detach N. Charleston from Charleston. Most of the industry in the Charleston metro is in North Charleston.

Charleston's job market seems to be mostly education, hospital and hospitality / tourism.
That information is based on metropolitan areas (MSAs), not municipalities. Greenville, Spartanburg, and Charleston are individual MSAs, which is why DEW breaks out their statistics separately. North Charleston is part of Charleston's MSA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2023, 12:01 PM
Status: "dreaming of Glacier National Park" (set 8 days ago)
 
721 posts, read 341,550 times
Reputation: 238
It doesn't make sense to link Anderson and Greenville's job market but separate Spartanburg.

I assume Greenville's MSA doesn't include Greenwood but many people who work in Greenville live in the Greenville suburbs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2023, 09:42 PM
 
37,875 posts, read 41,896,305 times
Reputation: 27266
Quote:
Originally Posted by LakeMan45 View Post
It doesn't make sense to link Anderson and Greenville's job market but separate Spartanburg.
It does when you understand the commuting criteria, regional economic geography, and the county-based nature of MSAs. But Spartanburg isn't completely separate as it is part of the larger combined statistical area (CSA).

Delineating the various types of metropolitan-based statistical regions isn't an exact science but it's very much defined statistically and uniformly.

Quote:
I assume Greenville's MSA doesn't include Greenwood but many people who work in Greenville live in the Greenville suburbs.
Greenwood is classified as a micropolitan statistical area, which are essentially mini-metro areas that, in most cases, consist of a sole county and have populations under 100-150K. Like Spartanburg, it is part of the larger Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson CSA which demonstrates its economic connectivity with the rest of the region but it also has enough industry within the county such that it doesn't meet the 25% commuter threshold that would make it part of the Greenville-Anderson MSA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > South Carolina

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top