Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Psychology
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-07-2021, 01:06 PM
 
4,043 posts, read 3,770,251 times
Reputation: 4103

Advertisements

People like to get angry and get attention by doing something dramatic like hurting others. I think anger has been glorified too much by the media, people getting their "just desserts" and whatnot for ignoring that person.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-08-2021, 06:48 AM
 
Location: Shawnee-on-Delaware, PA
8,050 posts, read 7,419,522 times
Reputation: 16305
Quote:
Originally Posted by silibran View Post
My theory on the school shooting is that disturbed teens follow the Columbine template. They are being neither clever or smart. They simply follow the known template. The reason? An hour of feeling feared and powerful perhaps. A desire for vengeance maybe. A striking out because of an unhappy life, or hope for notoriety.

There are so many guns out there, what do we really expect these days?
Obviously you aren't familiar with what you are talking about.

The Arlington TX shooting was not a Columbine-style premeditated crime. The shooter's family describes is as a case of black-on-black self defense where the shooter is the victim, picked on by thugs because of his nice clothes and fancy car.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2021, 07:05 AM
 
Location: Shawnee-on-Delaware, PA
8,050 posts, read 7,419,522 times
Reputation: 16305
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbgusa View Post
Today’s newspaper featured a heart rending story of an 18-year-old boy in Texas who shot and wounded three students, one of them critically (link), and one of whom declined medical attention. Of course, is very hard to interview these people because once they are arrested, they cannot really talk freely. Still, I would love to ask so these people why do you think using moral force in a schoolyard dispute is worthwhile.

In another story, a 29-year-old women cover for no good reason, attempted to push another woman how to Subway tracks in New York City (link). Again, why?

Are there any serious studies other than agenda-driven tracts about these fairly common, purposeless and tragic situations? Or in lieu of such studies, does anybody hear have any ideas?
These are two completely different situations.

The Arlington TX black-on-black public school shooting was (according to the shooter's family) an act of self defense after a long period of bullying over the shooter's nice clothes and a fancy car. The cell phone video that I've seen does show a kid getting beat up pretty bad by another kid in a classroom. the shooter's family says they reported the bullying to school authorities multiple times.

The NYC subway pusher is a mentally disturbed BIPOC woman who has been arrested multiple times for horrific acts of violence against other random BIPOC women and released each time. The family has been begging the city to force her into treatment but the city can't or won't. I heard a previous victim from July interviewed, saying the disturbed woman was under-charged with a third degree offense and released. That's only 3 months ago and she should have been held in a mental hospital or a prison.

As I said, they are different situations but they are both the result of a systematic dismantling of the structure of society. In what world is it OK for a knock-down, drag-out fight to erupt in a classroom? If this was a class for emotionally disturbed or otherwise problematic kids, why wasn't a husky aid (or two) assigned to the room? Why wasn't the bullying addressed? Why don't black kids applaud other black kids who dress nice and whose families appear successful?

The subway incident is just another in a long list of random attacks committed by mentally ill people in large cities. Why is that behavior tolerated by city authorities? Why is it tolerated by the voters? Why was Andrew Yang, when he ran for mayor earlier this year, excoriated in the press and by other candidates for pointing out the problem with mentally ill people roaming the streets? Why do the elites in New York look the other way, roll up the windows and tell the chauffeur to drive on when confronted with these issues?

Sorry that I don't have any data on the subject. However, I don't believe a lack of data is the problem. The question is what we should do about the problem. When your car engine is smoking you turn off the engine first and then set about about diagnosing and fixing the problem. Right now our society's engine is smoking. We need short term solutions before moving on to the big picture.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2021, 07:06 AM
 
13,395 posts, read 13,497,029 times
Reputation: 35712
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbgusa View Post
Today’s newspaper featured a heart rending story of an 18-year-old boy in Texas who shot and wounded three students, one of them critically (link), and one of whom declined medical attention. Of course, is very hard to interview these people because once they are arrested, they cannot really talk freely. Still, I would love to ask so these people why do you think using moral force in a schoolyard dispute is worthwhile.

In another story, a 29-year-old women cover for no good reason, attempted to push another woman how to Subway tracks in New York City (link). Again, why?

Are there any serious studies other than agenda-driven tracts about these fairly common, purposeless and tragic situations? Or in lieu of such studies, does anybody hear have any ideas?
OP, there's violence in many places besides in urban areas. Why do you think urban violence is different?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2021, 07:38 AM
 
Location: Honolulu/DMV Area/NYC
30,612 posts, read 18,192,641 times
Reputation: 34463
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sand&Salt View Post
I think it is the "normalization" of extreme, pointless violence on TV.

Just look at what's Number One on Netflix---apparently the MOST popular show they've done so far.

"SquidGames"---hour after hour of video-game-like killing but with real actors getting murdered en masse just for a "game". I was really alarmed to see this transition from game characters to real actors----this is a step in the wrong direction.

Violence is in almost every movie but this is a new LOW.

Kids absorb all this and unconsciously imitate it, probably not thinking of the ramifications. Nursing some affront they've experienced, as someone said.
I think this is an interesting point and one that warrants further investigation. But I'd also want to compare how things are here to how they are in other countries where these kinds of shows are also available. Urban South Korea--which is apparently used to shows like Squid Game and even more extreme violence than the US is--doesn't have a huge problem with urban violence. I understand that South Korea also doesn't have a high gun ownership rate, but the same point can be made about other countries with a relative high gun ownership rate to include, Switzerland.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2021, 08:32 AM
 
1,701 posts, read 781,038 times
Reputation: 4059
Quote:
Originally Posted by silibran View Post
My theory on the school shooting is that disturbed teens follow the Columbine template. They are being neither clever or smart. They simply follow the known template.
I agree with this. I think the Columbine, and Jonesborough shootings which happened about 2 years before, paved the way for a lot of this stuff. Unfortunately, the parents were making excuses for this kid saying "he was bullied", okay A LOT of people were bullied in school. Admittedly, I did my share and received plenty of my own. But, shooting up a school was the last thing my mind.

This ^^, of course, is easy for me to say when I don't know what many of these people are dealing with at home but A LOT of people got abused at home as well and didn't become school shooters.

Op, I wish I had answer to all of this but all I anybody can do is try to give their own children the best guidance they can to make sure they aren't raising they next school shooter or violent urbanite.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2021, 08:33 AM
 
3,319 posts, read 1,814,733 times
Reputation: 10333
Quote:
Originally Posted by sand&salt View Post
i think it is the "normalization" of extreme, pointless violence on tv.

Just look at what's number one on netflix---apparently the most popular show they've done so far.

"squidgames"---hour after hour of video-game-like killing but with real actors getting murdered en masse just for a "game". I was really alarmed to see this transition from game characters to real actors----this is a step in the wrong direction.

Violence is in almost every movie but this is a new low.

Kids absorb all this and unconsciously imitate it, probably not thinking of the ramifications. Nursing some affront they've experienced, as someone said.
+1.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2021, 10:36 AM
 
Location: Southwest Washington State
30,585 posts, read 25,135,704 times
Reputation: 50801
Quote:
Originally Posted by bus man View Post
I expect to see no correlation between gun ownership and gun crime, because it's not the mere presence of guns that causes crime.

Here are the 10 states with the highest rates of gun ownership per capita:

Montana
Wyoming
Alaska
Idaho
West Virginia
Arkansas
Mississippi
Alabama
South Dakota
North Dakota

Source: https://worldpopulationreview.com/st...rship-by-state

Now, here are the 10 states with the highest gun murder rates per capita:

Louisiana
Missouri
South Carolina
Delaware
Alaska
Maryland
Georgia
Tennessee
Mississippi
Michigan

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_vi...tates_by_state (far right column)

If the availability of guns was a primary driver of the gun crime rate, one would expect the same states to appear in both lists at more or less the same order. And yet, only two states (Alaska and Mississippi) appear on both lists. Montana and Wyoming are awash in guns, yet they rank only 33rd and 34th (respectively) on the gun crime list. Idaho and both Dakotas rank even lower.

The fact is, we don't have a gun problem in this country. We have a moral problem.
We have a gun problem. How do I know this? Unaccounted for military guns gone missing in the thousands. Guns in the hands of unhappy, vengeful teens, even when owners know their guns should be locked away. The ability for mentally unstable or criminal people to buy guns without any checks or regulations. The ability of gun owners to own as many guns as they want. The opportunity for almost anyone to own assault weapons, which exist solely to kill people. People kill masses of people continually, gunning them down in schools, shopping malls, supermarkets, newspaper offices.

We have a gun problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2021, 10:54 AM
 
Location: Southern MN
12,038 posts, read 8,403,014 times
Reputation: 44792
We have a mental health problem that has been exacerbated by our culture, environmental factors, politics and neglect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2021, 11:03 AM
 
2,690 posts, read 1,610,431 times
Reputation: 9918
Quote:
Originally Posted by silibran View Post
We have a gun problem. How do I know this? Unaccounted for military guns gone missing in the thousands. Guns in the hands of unhappy, vengeful teens, even when owners know their guns should be locked away. The ability for mentally unstable or criminal people to buy guns without any checks or regulations. The ability of gun owners to own as many guns as they want. The opportunity for almost anyone to own assault weapons, which exist solely to kill people. People kill masses of people continually, gunning them down in schools, shopping malls, supermarkets, newspaper offices.

We have a gun problem.
Bravo! Undisputable!

We also have an entitlement problem. It's not just us--Taliban Sunni Muslims set off one of their suicide bombers today and killed/maimed over a 100 Shiites.
Extremes. Entitlement and extremes. Religious ideals provoke extremes.

We have poor inner city people mowing each other down with drug wars. We have inner city people looting the mag mile in Chicago because they felt entitled to steal.

We have some right wing nut cases that want to control everybody else and dictate what is normal, eschew gays, colored people, religious control freaks who can get an abortion. Again, extremes.

We are no better than Afghanistan. Everybody needs to calm the crap down and mind their own business, be kind and polite, and when able, lend a helping hand to not just their tribe, but anybody they see who needs assistance. Give instead of take.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Psychology
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top