Biden Admin emailed Snopes to change Fact Check, Snopes Complied (Whitehouse, examples)

[anononcty]

USA Today recently had to change a headline after the original disgruntled by gangster Joe's crew.

https://www.westernjournal.com/usa-t...iden-campaign/

These are the same people that wanted an so called disinformation czar and pushed for censorship of wrong think to pursue their agenda.

[kdog]

Originally Posted by cowboyxjon

Yep! You have to be careful these days because the self-appointed “fact checkers” like Snopes will split hairs just to ensure that whatever subject they are writing about is favorable toward Democrats or leftist causes.

“Joe Biden didn’t trip when falling up the stairs to Air Force One as Republicans and others have been reporting; it was actually just as slight stumble!” FACT CHECK: FALSE, Joe Biden did not trip!

So yeah, Snopes isn’t a reliable source.

Wrong. Snopes rates that true. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bi...lls-on-stairs/

Apparently it's not Snopes who is unreliable here.

[cowboyxjon]

Originally Posted by kdog

Wrong. Snopes rates that true. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bi...lls-on-stairs/

Apparently it's not Snopes who is unreliable here.

That was just an example I made up without even looking, but okay! Snopes is neutral and nonpartisan.

(Note: I love how they go on to mention that two past Republican presidents tripped going up the stairs.)

[berdee]

Originally Posted by cowboyxjon

That was just an example I made up without even looking, but okay! Snopes is neutral and nonpartisan.

(Note: I love how they go on to mention that two past Republican presidents tripped going up the stairs.)

He didn't trip, it was the wind that had blown him down. remember?




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UfsqZ1T6E8&t=27s

[kdog]

Originally Posted by cowboyxjon

That was just an example I made up without even looking, but okay! Snopes is neutral and nonpartisan.

(Note: I love how they go on to mention that two past Republican presidents tripped going up the stairs.)

That right there exemplifies the Republican play book -- make it up as you go along. Thanks for having the guts to admit it.

[cowboyxjon]

Originally Posted by kdog

That right there exemplifies the Republican play book -- make it up as you go along. Thanks for having the guts to admit it.

Oh please, I’ve seen plenty of ‘fact check’ articles, even including from Snopes, that go out of the way to toe the Democrat narrative.

[kdog]

Originally Posted by cowboyxjon

Oh please, I’ve seen plenty of ‘fact check’ articles, even including from Snopes, that go out of the way to toe the Democrat narrative.

No you haven't. Prove me wrong by showing me one.

[Mathguy]

Originally Posted by cowboyxjon

That was just an example I made up without even looking, but okay! Snopes is neutral and nonpartisan.

(Note: I love how they go on to mention that two past Republican presidents tripped going up the stairs.)

OK, so in the future, don't make up stuff from thin air or it makes your entire argument look bad and not just that one point.

Lying in a court room for example, even if about 1 aspect will destroy your credibility, like it has here.

[berdee]

Originally Posted by kdog

No you haven't. Prove me wrong by showing me one.

The topic of this thread is one.

The time Biden* wore the hard hat backwards is another.

Snopes isn't the only one who puts out false facts as truth, and then has to revise them later:

https://www.city-data.com/forum/poli...evise-his.html


There are instances, but when you ignore them then you would believe there are none.

[cowboyxjon]

Originally Posted by Mathguy

OK, so in the future, don't make up stuff from thin air or it makes your entire argument look bad and not just that one point.

Lying in a court room for example, even if about 1 aspect will destroy your credibility, like it has here.

Lying in a court room didn’t destroy Fani Willis’ credibility in the eyes of Democrats, at least.

Anyway, my bad since I made up the example and I guess some thought I was quoting Snopes directly.