Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-17-2012, 01:45 PM
 
Location: Bucks, UK
523 posts, read 3,804,735 times
Reputation: 1163

Advertisements

currently not feeling very warm & fuzzy about NJ cops - my wife just got stopped for "speeding" - she maintains she wasn't - cop says she was doing "about 38" in a 35 zone - but did her the favour of trading down the ticket for obscured plates.

total and utter BS - the local police force can kiss goodbye to my annual charitable donation - it seems they choose to fundraise in their own special way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-17-2012, 04:26 PM
 
Location: Epping,NH
2,105 posts, read 6,661,187 times
Reputation: 1089
Quote:
she maintains she wasn't
Quote:
it seems they choose to fundraise in their own special way.
I guess you aren't aware that fines from state statutes are forwarded to the state, not the city.

In most cases, the obscured plates are used to avoid EZPass payments and red light cameras.

Quote:
"about 38" in a 35 zone
Taking that with a grain of salt. In any case, she avoids a point violation for a no point no cost violation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2012, 05:05 PM
 
Location: Bucks, UK
523 posts, read 3,804,735 times
Reputation: 1163
im not particularly bothered where the money goes - her plates werent obscured, and, at best, she may have been doing a mile or two above the speed limit - nothing that would merit a ticket. if this is how one gets treated in one's own town, then the local cops are going to have an uphill struggle getting voluntary donations.

in case it wasnt clear the "about 38" comment was from the cop, not my wife.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2012, 09:17 AM
 
Location: Epping,NH
2,105 posts, read 6,661,187 times
Reputation: 1089
I understood that. I just have some "reservations" about it. If revenue was the issue, why issue a cheap summons when a much more expensive one was available? In fact your "revenue" comment is without merit.

You never commented on why the plates were considered "Obscured".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2012, 09:25 AM
 
1,437 posts, read 2,571,252 times
Reputation: 1190
Quote:
Originally Posted by rscalzo View Post
I understood that. I just have some "reservations" about it. If revenue was the issue, why issue a cheap summons when a much more expensive one was available? In fact your "revenue" comment is without merit.

You never commented on why the plates were considered "Obscured".
Police officers do have a Quota or expectation of number of tickets to write( my dad is a retired cop, so dont tell me its not true.)

They will write no-points tickets to help you out. He could have given a speeding ticket or something else so count your blessings.

And never mouth off to the cop... stupid to that, just watch "Cops"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2012, 10:45 AM
 
Location: Epping,NH
2,105 posts, read 6,661,187 times
Reputation: 1089
Quote:
Police officers do have a Quota or expectation of number of tickets to write
Sorry, but you are clueless in this area. In fact any agency or administrator attempting to enforce or put any sort of a quota into effect is subject to the penalties under 40A:14-181.2 as of Feb. 1, 2001. Several towns have already been sued and lost years ago when they attempted to institute one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2012, 09:06 PM
 
Location: Bucks, UK
523 posts, read 3,804,735 times
Reputation: 1163
I didn't comment on why the plates were considered obscured, and neither did the cop...because they weren't. As for the much more expensive penalty, what is the going rate for doing "about 38" in a 35? Presumably speeding tickets need to be supported by some sort of accurate speed reading from a calibrated radar device, rather than a spurious guesstimate...that would be my guess as to why such a ticket was not issued.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2012, 06:16 AM
 
Location: Central Jersey - Florida
3,377 posts, read 14,624,724 times
Reputation: 2272
It's obvious that your pretty angry. My take is that there is more to the story than your wife being stopped for "AROUND" 38 in a 35. Just so that your clear a Police Officer that is certified to operate RADAR in the State Of New Jersey must successfully pass a number of items when being trained in the use of RADAR. The most important of all is the estimation of speed. Without being properly trained in the estimation of speed, the operation of RADAR is useless. When an officer is properly prepared to present his / her case in court, one of the first things he / she will testify to is the estimation of speed before being confirmed by RADAR.

Last edited by exhdo1; 01-19-2012 at 06:33 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2012, 07:47 AM
 
Location: NJ & NV
5,771 posts, read 16,582,047 times
Reputation: 2475
All in all, consider yourself lucky. Most taxpaying working stiffs get pulled over in whatever town and feel very greatful when they come into court and get offered the "Jim McGreevy No Point Special" which in NJ they offer most anyone, make that anyone. It is called a "no pointer" but they pay $150 court costs, $250 surcharge plus the fine which totals out to about $480. And they only let you do this twice in 5 years, then only once every 5 years after that.

I think 99% of NJ tickets get settled this way, even if you didn't do anything. Your other choice is to go to trial, which means you have to come back again another day or night and well chances are, who is the judge going to believe?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2012, 08:29 AM
 
1,437 posts, read 2,571,252 times
Reputation: 1190
Quote:
Originally Posted by rscalzo View Post
Sorry, but you are clueless in this area. In fact any agency or administrator attempting to enforce or put any sort of a quota into effect is subject to the penalties under 40A:14-181.2 as of Feb. 1, 2001. Several towns have already been sued and lost years ago when they attempted to institute one.
I am not clueless. My dad was a cop and he had Expectations on a number of tickets.. Maybe things have changed since he retired. But with tax revenues down many municipalities and states see tickets as a revenue enhancer.

And what you posted proves my point. There were jurisdictions that had quotas for their officers

Just because it is against the law does not mean its not happening. Thats why my dad had an "expectation" not a a "quota". If it is not an expectation there is probably some sort of incentive or some kind of roundabout way of instituting a quota.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top