Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Minnesota
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-21-2013, 10:15 AM
 
Location: Twin Cities
5,831 posts, read 7,728,803 times
Reputation: 8867

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by dravogadro View Post
Hybrids are moving into the large vehicle market in a big way. I'm pretty sure a few companies at least have hybrid tractor prototypes out.
They are expected soon, but acquiring one will be very costly. This is not a knock on the hybrid idea; all tractors are very costly. Farmers will often keep tractors in service for a very long time because they cost so much, so it will take a long time before these would make a significant inroad on the total farming fleet in this country.
Hybrid tractor engines close to market | Utility Tractors content from Farm Industry News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-21-2013, 10:16 AM
 
5,342 posts, read 14,155,008 times
Reputation: 4700
Quote:
Originally Posted by xandrex View Post
Consumption of gas in the United States is declining. Other than replacement, we likely don't need much more actual capacity (I'm open to the idea of more depending on factors, but my opinion doesn't really matter in that case). It will just lead to excess capacity in the future, which no business will want to have. It would just be an extra cost. When the refineries have gone down, we've been covered: we pay a bit more until the refinery is back up and then things go back to normal (refineries aren't free either...you'll pay for that in your gas as well).

The government wouldn't let gas jump to $6/gallon (but I'm sure we'll slowly hit that at some point). If prices were threatening to jump, they'd open the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.
The gov't can influence, but not control the price. We could easily hit a time where they pulled out all the stops and still weren't able to keep the cost in check.

The reserve, though the largest in the world, holds a couple month's worth of oil (based on US consumption). But again, this is oil that needs to be refined. What if a couple southern refineries were down or worse blown up?

US oil consumption is pretty flat, but we constantly hear about limited refining capacity. If we ever end up with excess capacity (which I doubt) we can export!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2013, 10:25 AM
 
Location: Twin Cities
5,831 posts, read 7,728,803 times
Reputation: 8867
Quote:
Originally Posted by xandrex View Post
The government wouldn't let gas jump to $6/gallon (but I'm sure we'll slowly hit that at some point). If prices were threatening to jump, they'd open the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.
Not to debate the wisdom of tapping or not tapping the SPR, but what is your basis for saying that $6 a gallon is any more of a trigger point than $4.50? Maybe the trigger point is $7, or maybe there isn't any price that the administration feels is too high. If you have a source for the $6 number, I would be interested in seeing it because I haven't read anything that would indicate that they have such a plan.

Again, I am not advocating doing this, I am just wondering where you got the $6 figure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2013, 11:28 AM
 
Location: Minnesota
5,147 posts, read 7,488,370 times
Reputation: 1578
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimtheGuy View Post
Uh huh.

Why are there states in the U.S. right now where gas is $1/gal cheaper than it is here in MN?
Because that's what gets the sellers the optimum profit. Take market economics 101. Demand as well as cost of production. I can tell you ONE thing that doesn't set it. Congress does not send out orders to set the price. Actually right now Congress is becalmed and couldn't do anything if it wanted to. Maybe you should ask if a paralyzed Congress is the villain. But, no, it is again just market economics. Remember that Koch Industries produces one out of every two gallons sold. Should you blame the Koch brothers? I'd love to do that, but it still wouldn't work for them if people just don't buy. So they've jacked the price up sky high and everyone here still buys. What reason is there for them to drop the price? If they sell all they have to sell, this is their optimum price point right now. When the supply starts to back up, then they'll recalculate.

Only in a planned economy would it work different. I'd say maybe 5 or 10 percent of gas consumers actually would support central planning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2013, 12:37 PM
 
5,342 posts, read 14,155,008 times
Reputation: 4700
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beenhere4ever View Post
Because that's what gets the sellers the optimum profit. Take market economics 101. Demand as well as cost of production. I can tell you ONE thing that doesn't set it. Congress does not send out orders to set the price. Actually right now Congress is becalmed and couldn't do anything if it wanted to. Maybe you should ask if a paralyzed Congress is the villain. But, no, it is again just market economics. Remember that Koch Industries produces one out of every two gallons sold. Should you blame the Koch brothers? I'd love to do that, but it still wouldn't work for them if people just don't buy. So they've jacked the price up sky high and everyone here still buys. What reason is there for them to drop the price? If they sell all they have to sell, this is their optimum price point right now. When the supply starts to back up, then they'll recalculate.

Only in a planned economy would it work different. I'd say maybe 5 or 10 percent of gas consumers actually would support central planning.
gee...where did i mention anything about congress setting anything?

i know all about the market forces.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2013, 01:55 PM
 
Location: Minnesota
5,147 posts, read 7,488,370 times
Reputation: 1578
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimtheGuy View Post
gee...where did i mention anything about congress setting anything?

i know all about the market forces.
Good. Not everyone here seems to understand they have to NOT BUY if they object to the price. They want to "blame the government" rather than blame themselves for being docile customers. That's been encouraged by shady politicians. Sheeple always get the shaft.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2013, 02:15 PM
 
5,342 posts, read 14,155,008 times
Reputation: 4700
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beenhere4ever View Post
Good. Not everyone here seems to understand they have to NOT BUY if they object to the price. They want to "blame the government" rather than blame themselves for being docile customers. That's been encouraged by shady politicians. Sheeple always get the shaft.
If you read my posts, I do contend the gov't plays a part (just not the part of 'setting prices'). I don't have to "not buy" to object to the price.

I just saw today's Star Trib. with the gas price map. My be the Koch brothers just don't like MN and ND huh??

Last edited by TimtheGuy; 05-21-2013 at 02:26 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2013, 02:21 PM
 
1,816 posts, read 3,032,681 times
Reputation: 774
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenfield View Post
Not to debate the wisdom of tapping or not tapping the SPR, but what is your basis for saying that $6 a gallon is any more of a trigger point than $4.50? Maybe the trigger point is $7, or maybe there isn't any price that the administration feels is too high. If you have a source for the $6 number, I would be interested in seeing it because I haven't read anything that would indicate that they have such a plan.

Again, I am not advocating doing this, I am just wondering where you got the $6 figure.
I was referencing Timtheguy's point of "if gas shot to $6/gallon". I don't have any actual evidence of where the breaking point is. I think the breaking point depends on a whole host of factors. But if gas were to jump to $6/gallon right now, I think we'd actually see people talking about opening the SPR because the economy is still fairly fragile.

But really, the trigger could be $4.50. It could be $10. I'm not an expert on this (and, as far as anyone has made known, neither are they), so it's all just armchair quarterbacking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2013, 02:34 PM
 
Location: Twin Cities
5,831 posts, read 7,728,803 times
Reputation: 8867
Quote:
Originally Posted by xandrex View Post
I was referencing Timtheguy's point of "if gas shot to $6/gallon". I don't have any actual evidence of where the breaking point is. I think the breaking point depends on a whole host of factors. But if gas were to jump to $6/gallon right now, I think we'd actually see people talking about opening the SPR because the economy is still fairly fragile.

But really, the trigger could be $4.50. It could be $10. I'm not an expert on this (and, as far as anyone has made known, neither are they), so it's all just armchair quarterbacking.
Thanks. I missed Tim's reference and thought you might have read something somewhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2013, 04:01 PM
 
Location: Minnesota
5,147 posts, read 7,488,370 times
Reputation: 1578
Love the fact that $4.35 will sell more hybrid and electric cars. Other industrial nations are really eating our lunch on those products because their people care. Nissan wants to be #1. In America, its all about monster trucks. But, wow, gas goes up and the kvetching is DEAFENING. People sure hate to lie down in the bed they've made for themselves. Me, I've shrunk my driving mileage to something like 25 percent of the norm. I can be quite relaxed about these big shifts. My ox isn't being gored.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Minnesota
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top