Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Pets > Dogs
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-04-2016, 09:04 AM
 
Location: Wherever I am
457 posts, read 890,231 times
Reputation: 464

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by foxywench View Post
that's pretty much it.
slow kill was always the choice for dogs with SERIOUS infestations as its much safer to have them die off slowly placing much less strain on the body than to have them all die in a short period.

Fast kill is the only currently "approved" method, however many vets are now choosing to go with the slow kill method

the slow kill method relies on preventing further reproduction of the heartworm parasite, the adults cannot produce new larve to grow the infestation and thus it maintains a low manageable level of the parasite, as the heartworms age (they don't have a super long lifespan) they die off one by one, allowing the body to easily shed the worms in much smaller numbers, less stress on the heart, less strain on the body...but...obviously it takes a long time for any young worms that were hatched before treatment to "age out" and die off...
you do still have to restrict serious excersize, no marathon running lol, and will often have some coughing after hard running...
in cases of low parasitic load theres also typically no lasting damage.
in advanced cases there can be lasting heart damage simply due to the heavy worm load (this can also happen with fast kill)
generally with serious worm loads vets may use a combination using 1 dose of regular fast kill" method to kill all the adults it can in a big swoop, then using slow kill to maintain and rid the body of the rest in a gentler way.

its definatly something to research as an option, again the "slow kill" method is not approved, however many ves are switching to this as their choice method.

Thanks for this info!! It's nice to see a summary that outlines both, without bias (like pretty much every website you go to, lol)!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Pets > Dogs

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top