Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arizona
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Would you support a commuter rail system along the I-10 corridor?
Yes 10 47.62%
No 5 23.81%
Maybe 6 28.57%
Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-10-2016, 10:28 PM
 
Location: PHX -> ATL
6,311 posts, read 6,827,554 times
Reputation: 7168

Advertisements

Would you support this idea? One from Tucson to maybe Buckeye? With a stop maybe around Downtown Tucson, Eloy, Casa Grande, one near maybe Warner Road, a Downtown stop, one around maybe Avondale, and another near Buckeye?

Honestly the idea seems to make sense. Arizona is still a fast growing state and I think we could benefit from it in the future. Places with smaller populations like Salt Lake City, Albuquerque, all have commuter rails. Salt Lake Coty's commuter rail is actually well-run and highly praised.

One benefit to a commuter rail in this corridor is not just that most people in Arizona live near it is that there is already a rail system that runs along side the freeway. I know Utah bought the right of way for their commuter rail which significantly reduced costs since they didn't have to build a new rail line. Arizona could benefit from this possibility as well.

What do you think?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-10-2016, 10:50 PM
 
Location: Prescott Valley, AZ
3,409 posts, read 4,642,087 times
Reputation: 3925
Who will pay for it? Will it be a privately ran business or publicly funded through tax payers?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2016, 11:37 PM
 
8,081 posts, read 6,968,022 times
Reputation: 7983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hschlick84 View Post
Who will pay for it? Will it be a privately ran business or publicly funded through tax payers?
No and yes. It wouldn't be profitable as would either turn into a subsidized money sink, or run by a state agency. Public transportation doesn't work in the free market or we'd have it.


I would support it.

I would hope the state/municipalities would try to gain full access to Federal Grants to ease the cost, but they've been concerned with States rights bills lately claiming the Federal Governmemt coerces them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2016, 11:55 PM
 
Location: PHX -> ATL
6,311 posts, read 6,827,554 times
Reputation: 7168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hschlick84 View Post
Who will pay for it? Will it be a privately ran business or publicly funded through tax payers?
As JG mentioned, public transportation has never been profitable. Don't quote me on the time frame but I believe exactly a century ago or so things like rail cars were ran by private businesses... They were made public when the companies would fight over the "profitable" routes and ignored parts of town that needed it but were deemed unprofitable. It was rather conclusive with a lot of communities at the time that public transportation was best off without competitors, and ran by the government.

I wouldn't be opposed to this being a private business but like I said, I doubt it would be significantly profitable to the point of supporting its own overhead, etc.

Public transportation helps attract businesses (they do these days anyway) and will help reduce commute times. I see such an idea particularly benefitting West Valley and people in Casa Grande, or anyone who does business in both. The I-10 is only getting worse, I remember when it was just over an hour to get between Tucson and Phoenix and now it is reliably two hours. The freeway has a lot of trucks, a lot of out of staters, and a lot of people who drive too slow (below the speed limit FYI). Some parts of the I-10 are reliably bad, like just before Ahwatukee, right after Casa Grande on the way to Tucson, near the date farms, etc. I've driven this route way too many times, even at night it tends to clog up in these spots.

Building a foundation for commuter rail could be even more useful if California decides it would like to link up with us on the High Speed Rail, they already have plans to extend to Vegas so the idea isn't entirely out of reach.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2016, 07:36 AM
 
9,576 posts, read 7,349,164 times
Reputation: 14004
Quote:
Originally Posted by :-D View Post
One benefit to a commuter rail in this corridor is not just that most people in Arizona live near it is that there is already a rail system that runs along side the freeway. I know Utah bought the right of way for their commuter rail which significantly reduced costs since they didn't have to build a new rail line. Arizona could benefit from this possibility as well.

What do you think?
The impression I got from the ADOT feasibility study of this project is that the commuter rail from Phoenix to Tucson (if it ever gets built) wouldn't share the current rail line along I-10, but they would build their own line right next to the freight lines in the same ROW. Companies like BNSF Railway, Norfolk Southern Railway, Union Pacific Railroad, etc. hate sharing their lines with public transportation (even though they receive lease money), plus they have priority over any public train on their lines, that's why Amtrak is so late/delayed when using rail lines they don't own.


Passenger Rail Study: Tucson to Phoenix

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2016, 07:43 AM
 
Location: Prescott Valley, AZ
3,409 posts, read 4,642,087 times
Reputation: 3925
Quote:
Originally Posted by JGMotorsport64 View Post
No and yes. It wouldn't be profitable as would either turn into a subsidized money sink, or run by a state agency. Public transportation doesn't work in the free market or we'd have it.


I would support it.

I would hope the state/municipalities would try to gain full access to Federal Grants to ease the cost, but they've been concerned with States rights bills lately claiming the Federal Governmemt coerces them.
If people support a measure, could it be up for vote as a Referendum on a ballot for November 2017 as a tax on vehicle registration to pay for such a project through Valley Metro? Here in Denver, we pay RTD through vehicle registration, most of it covers the costs for light rail and RTD buses. I voted maybe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2016, 10:05 AM
 
Location: Chandler, AZ
4,073 posts, read 5,155,761 times
Reputation: 6169
Why would I want to pay for transportation I would never use?

And wouldn't this just encourage more sprawl only now down the 1-10 corridor?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2016, 10:15 AM
 
8,081 posts, read 6,968,022 times
Reputation: 7983
Quote:
Originally Posted by KurtAZ View Post
Why would I want to pay for transportation I would never use?

And wouldn't this just encourage more sprawl only now down the 1-10 corridor?
I would like to see it connect to the existing line and run along the belt loops (202/10/101/17/60).

A line to Tucson makes sense if you live in Tucson but not vice versa which is why that probably won't happen.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hschlick84 View Post
If people support a measure, could it be up for vote as a Referendum on a ballot for November 2017 as a tax on vehicle registration to pay for such a project through Valley Metro? Here in Denver, we pay RTD through vehicle registration, most of it covers the costs for light rail and RTD buses. I voted maybe.
It's possible, but I don't see increasing vehicle registration costs as a popular idea. If you've registered a car here, it's already expensive.

It could be done like the SR Loops were built, via HURF from municipalities, and other programs as ADOT currently uses.

As long as we have an admin like Ducey it would be funded through consumption taxes in some manner.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2016, 02:30 PM
 
Location: PHX -> ATL
6,311 posts, read 6,827,554 times
Reputation: 7168
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjseliga View Post
The impression I got from the ADOT feasibility study of this project is that the commuter rail from Phoenix to Tucson (if it ever gets built) wouldn't share the current rail line along I-10, but they would build their own line right next to the freight lines in the same ROW. Companies like BNSF Railway, Norfolk Southern Railway, Union Pacific Railroad, etc. hate sharing their lines with public transportation (even though they receive lease money), plus they have priority over any public train on their lines, that's why Amtrak is so late/delayed when using rail lines they don't own.


Passenger Rail Study: Tucson to Phoenix
That's possible.

With that image it could cost more to do the yellow or the orange. I could see why there would be a hesitation to do the green because A) it doesn't support SE Valley (would help to get it passed) and B) it goes through the reservation which could be costly.

I find it interesting that they proposed a spur onto Grand Avenue. I think that could be really useful, it would only need to reach the Eastern edges of Surprise and it would help the majority of West Valley that way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2016, 02:37 PM
 
8,081 posts, read 6,968,022 times
Reputation: 7983
Quote:
Originally Posted by :-D View Post
That's possible.

With that image it could cost more to do the yellow or the orange. I could see why there would be a hesitation to do the green because A) it doesn't support SE Valley (would help to get it passed) and B) it goes through the reservation which could be costly.

I find it interesting that they proposed a spur onto Grand Avenue. I think that could be really useful, it would only need to reach the Eastern edges of Surprise and it would help the majority of West Valley that way.
Another Negative for Green is it doesn't connect to Phoenix Gateway Airport. Both airports connected by train would be very interesting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arizona

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top