Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 04-18-2024, 11:18 AM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
7,368 posts, read 3,829,330 times
Reputation: 5337

Advertisements

Quote:
California Proposition 63, English as the Official Language Initiative (1986)

"OFFICIAL STATE LANGUAGE. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Provides that English is the official language of State of California. Requires Legislature to enforce this provision by appropriate legislation. Requires Legislature and state officials to take all steps necessary to ensure that the role of English as the common language of the state is preserved and enhanced. Provides that the Legislature shall make no law which diminishes or ignores the role of English as the common language. Provides that any resident of or person doing business in state shall have standing to sue the state to enforce these provisions. Summary of Legislative Analyst's estimate of net state and local government fiscal impact: This measure would have no direct effect on the costs or revenues of the state or local governments."

https://ballotpedia.org/California_P...tiative_(1986)
Proposition 63 passed with almost 75% support, the highest of any proposition in California history.

I posted this just in case anyone forgot.

This being the case, why does the DMV print all their material in 73 different languages at our expense?

 
Old 04-18-2024, 11:29 AM
 
Location: Charlotte
2,413 posts, read 2,703,724 times
Reputation: 3371
The proposition's language was extremely vague and open to a wide range of interpretations, so it is essentially not enforceable. Nobody has tried any notable lawsuit either.

For example, does offering another languages on DMV forms conflict with "ensuring that the role of English as the common language of the state is preserved and enhanced" so long as English is always available and other languages are optionally available? That's up to interpretation. Somebody can sue... if they'd like, but they'd probably lose a lot of money doing so.
 
Old 04-18-2024, 12:18 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
7,368 posts, read 3,829,330 times
Reputation: 5337
Quote:
Originally Posted by CLT4 View Post
The proposition's language was extremely vague and open to a wide range of interpretations, so it is essentially not enforceable. Nobody has tried any notable lawsuit either.

For example, does offering another languages on DMV forms conflict with "ensuring that the role of English as the common language of the state is preserved and enhanced" so long as English is always available and other languages are optionally available? That's up to interpretation. Somebody can sue... if they'd like, but they'd probably lose a lot of money doing so.
It looks pretty clear to me: "... common language of the state is preserved and enhanced" means English should be promoted at all levels, and if other languages are requested, their printing and distribution should not be on California taxpayers.

The only way to make English premier in the state is to stop printing official state documents in other languages. And stop providing interpreters on the taxpayer's dime except maybe in criminal cases.
 
Old 04-18-2024, 01:58 PM
 
Location: Encino, CA
4,566 posts, read 5,425,031 times
Reputation: 8252
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattja View Post
English is the official language of California

Proposition 63 passed with almost 75% support, the highest of any proposition in California history.

This being the case, why does the DMV print all their material in 73 different languages at our expense?
Actually, CA DMV only offers it in 32 different languages, not 73. This "73" is a completely made up figure that you came up with. You are so not dealing with any facts here. The CA DMV understands that we are a desired destination for immigrants from all over the world, so its great that we can help make their transition to American life just a tad bit easier by providing printed info and tests in their native languages. Just another amazing thing that makes CA GREAT.

Oh, and for anyone looking to do a bit of research on this, you have to go all the way back almost 40 years for info on this. There has since been TWO different Prop 63s in CA. The latest was overturned by a judge just this January 2024. It had to do with mandating background checks for ammo purchases in CA.

Last edited by Kings Gambit; 04-18-2024 at 02:14 PM..
 
Old 04-18-2024, 02:31 PM
 
Location: Charlotte
2,413 posts, read 2,703,724 times
Reputation: 3371
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattja View Post
It looks pretty clear to me: "... common language of the state is preserved and enhanced" means English should be promoted at all levels, and if other languages are requested, their printing and distribution should not be on California taxpayers.

The only way to make English premier in the state is to stop printing official state documents in other languages. And stop providing interpreters on the taxpayer's dime except maybe in criminal cases.
You are welcome to sue the state to argue that the law prohibits taxpayers funding other languages. Because that is not directly stated in the law (taxpayers paying for documents in other languages), it may be tough to win. It just says you need to preserve and enhance English, but doesn't prohibit documents in other languages explicitly. If it was an easy lawsuit, I imagine somebody would have sued by now and succeeded given its been almost 40 years.
 
Old 04-18-2024, 02:47 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
7,368 posts, read 3,829,330 times
Reputation: 5337
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kings Gambit View Post
Actually, CA DMV only offers it in 32 different languages, not 73. This "73" is a completely made up figure that you came up with. You are so not dealing with any facts here. The CA DMV understands that we are a desired destination for immigrants from all over the world, so its great that we can help make their transition to American life just a tad bit easier by providing printed info and tests in their native languages. Just another amazing thing that makes CA GREAT.
Yes, 73 is a made-up figure, but does it really matter? I don't think so. Fine then, 32. But 32 is 31 languages too many.

How can the state promote English as the primary language when it makes every effort to undermine that requirement? We cannot have universal English in the state if in practice, we do everything in our power to oppose it.

Quote:
Oh, and for anyone looking to do a bit of research on this, you have to go all the way back almost 40 years for info on this. There has since been TWO different Prop 63s in CA. The latest was overturned by a judge just this January 2024. It had to do with mandating background checks for ammo purchases in CA.
Why would anyone be confused when the 1986 date is in my OP?
 
Old 04-18-2024, 05:35 PM
 
114 posts, read 47,886 times
Reputation: 345
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattja View Post
Proposition 63 passed with almost 75% support, the highest of any proposition in California history.

I posted this just in case anyone forgot.

This being the case, why does the DMV print all their material in 73 different languages at our expense?
All the street signs are in English. If you drive our streets you should be able to read English. I’ve had Uber drivers that can’t speak English. I don’t know how they do their job
 
Old 04-18-2024, 05:41 PM
 
Location: Knoxville, TN
11,507 posts, read 6,021,967 times
Reputation: 22561
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattja View Post
Proposition 63 passed with almost 75% support, the highest of any proposition in California history.

I posted this just in case anyone forgot.

This being the case, why does the DMV print all their material in 73 different languages at our expense?
If a tree falls in the forest and nobody hears it, does it make a noise?

If a proposition passes in California and nobody enforces it, is it still the law?

I don't specifically remember why this law was not installed and enforced. I remember that progressive plaintiffs would always sue on constitutional grounds, and get a friendly judge to declare it unconsitutional, then upheld by the 9th Circus. People would beg the liberal democrat governor to appeal to the Supremes, but of course he would not.

That is what happened to Prop 187 in 1994, which banned money and services for illegal immigrants. The will of the people was not the will of the socialist state, so the socialist state just crushed the will of the people. I would expect something similar for Prop 63 but then, GOP George Deukmajian was governor, so I can't explain that.
 
Old 04-18-2024, 08:16 PM
 
11,081 posts, read 6,898,296 times
Reputation: 18111
"English is the official language of California."

Tell that to 1992 me in Los Angeles during a particularly long-term recession when people with 20 yrs' experience who don't speak Spanish could not get a job (myself and many others) after being laid off. Tell that to English-speaking-only people who lose out on jobs that post "Spanish speaking preferred." Tell that to contract workers who lose out due to same during said recession.

I used to be tolerant. After all that started, no more. When people who are English-speaking are passed over for employment in their own damn country, it's time for some serious legislation and enforcement after a huge reality check. I was driving on the 22 freeway in Los Angeles County last week and saw a huge marquee that stated "Se Habla Espanol Aqui" -- why is that necessary? Why is it even condoned? You move to a country, you learn the language. Period.
 
Old 04-18-2024, 08:41 PM
 
Location: Sandy Eggo's North County
10,311 posts, read 6,856,670 times
Reputation: 16898
Quote:
Originally Posted by pathrunner View Post
"English is the official language of California."

Tell that to 1992 me in Los Angeles during a particularly long-term recession when people with 20 yrs' experience who don't speak Spanish could not get a job (myself and many others) after being laid off. Tell that to English-speaking-only people who lose out on jobs that post "Spanish speaking preferred." Tell that to contract workers who lose out due to same during said recession.

I used to be tolerant. After all that started, no more. When people who are English-speaking are passed over for employment in their own damn country, it's time for some serious legislation and enforcement after a huge reality check. I was driving on the 22 freeway in Los Angeles County last week and saw a huge marquee that stated "Se Habla Espanol Aqui" -- why is that necessary? Why is it even condoned? You move to a country, you learn the language. Period.
Been thru Westminster lately? (The last 40 years or so.)
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top