California Montessori Project-Shingle Springs Campus School in Shingle Springs, CA
(KG-08 • Public • Regular School)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in California) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 81
- Address
- 4645 Buckeye Rd.
Shingle Springs, CA 95682
- Telephone
- (530) 672-3095
(make sure to verify first before calling)
- Website
- http://www.cacmp.org
- City-data.com school rating
- 81
- Students
- 438
- Classroom Teachers (FTE)
- 22.7
- National School Lunch
Program (NSLP) Status - No
- Free lunch eligible students
- 35
- Reduced-price lunch
eligible students - 15
- School district
- Buckeye Union Elementary
- Charter school
- Yes
- Magnet School Indicator
- No
- Shared Time Indicator
- Missing
- Adult education offered
- No
No street view available for this location
Ratings
This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
California Montessori Project-Shingle Springs Campus School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:California: | 46 |
El Dorado County: | 63 |
Shingle Springs: | 84 |
This School: | 81 |
Students & Teachers
Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 438
Enrollment in 2015: 372
Enrollment in 2014: 366
Enrollment in 2013: 366
Enrollment in 2012: 361
Enrollment in 2011: 352
Enrollment in 2010: 331
Enrollment in 2009: 308
Enrollment in 2008: 307
Enrollment in 2007: 305
California Montessori Project-Shingle Springs Campus School - Historical enrollment
Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
Grade | KG | G01 | G02 | G03 | G04 | G05 | G06 | G07 | G08 | Total |
---|
All students | 60 | 49 | 61 | 56 | 53 | 38 | 43 | 43 | 35 | 438 |
Female students | 25 | 24 | 26 | 24 | 31 | 16 | 21 | 23 | 19 | 209 |
Male students | 35 | 25 | 35 | 32 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 20 | 16 | 229 |
American Indian/Alaska Native students | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
Asian students | 6 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 28 |
Hispanic students | 7 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 5 | 7 | 61 |
White students | 46 | 34 | 42 | 38 | 42 | 26 | 31 | 33 | 22 | 314 |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
Two or More Races students | 1 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 33 |
Enrollment by grade:
Kindergarten enrollment: 60
1st grade enrollment: 49
2nd grade enrollment: 61
3rd grade enrollment: 56
4th grade enrollment: 53
5th grade enrollment: 38
6th grade enrollment: 43
7th grade enrollment: 43
8th grade enrollment: 35
California Montessori Project-Shingle Springs Campus School - Historical enrollment by grade
Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
Female enrollment: 209 (47.7%)California Montessori Project-Shingle Springs Campus School: | 47.7% |
State: | 49.4% |
Male enrollment: 229 (52.3%)California Montessori Project-Shingle Springs Campus School: | 52.3% |
California: | 49.6% |
California Montessori Project-Shingle Springs Campus School - Historical enrollment by gender
Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 1 (0.2%)California Montessori Project-Shingle Springs Campus School: | 0.2% |
State: | 1.0% |
Asian enrollment: 28 (6.4%)California Montessori Project-Shingle Springs Campus School: | 6.4% |
California: | 9.4% |
Hispanic enrollment: 61 (13.9%)California Montessori Project-Shingle Springs Campus School: | 13.9% |
California: | 46.0% |
White enrollment: 314 (71.7%)
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 1 (0.2%)School: | 0.2% |
California: | 0.6% |
Two or More Races enrollment: 33 (7.5%)California Montessori Project-Shingle Springs Campus School: | 7.5% |
California: | 4.5% |
California Montessori Project-Shingle Springs Campus School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity
Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 10,111 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 50 (11.4%)Here: | 11.4% |
California: | 61.2% |
Free lunch eligible students: 35 (8.0%)
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 15 (3.4%)California Montessori Project-Shingle Springs Campus School: | 3.4% |
California: | 8.6% |
California Montessori Project-Shingle Springs Campus School - Lunch Program Eligibility
Teachers and support:
(State average from 12,394 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 22.7
California Montessori Project-Shingle Springs Campus School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio
Statewide Student Assessments
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments:
(State average from 10,463 schools)
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments (SB) is one of the online summative assessments - part of California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System.
The summative assessments are comprehensive, end-of-year assessments of grade-level learning that measure progress toward college and career readiness. Each test in English language arts/literacy (ELA) and mathematics is comprised of two parts: (1) a computer-adaptive test and (2) a performance task, administered within a selected testing window available at 66 percent of the instructional year for grades three through eight, and grade eleven.
The summative assessments are aligned with the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for ELA and mathematics. The tests capitalize on the strengths of computer adaptive testing efficient and precise measurement across the full range of achievement and timely turnaround of results.
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All66%
- Males59%
- Females72%
- White64%
ELA students tested: 289
ELA students with scores: 289
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 66% |
State: | 49% |
Standard Not Met:
14.5%Standard Nearly Met:
19.7%Standard Met:
34.3%Standard Exceeded:
31.5%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2462.9, Students tested: 60, Standard Not Met: 10.0%, Nearly Met: 28.3%, Met: 18.3%, Exceeded: 43.3%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2503.6, Students tested: 53, Standard Not Met: 18.9%, Nearly Met: 17.0%, Met: 28.3%, Exceeded: 35.9%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2520.0, Students tested: 52, Standard Not Met: 19.2%, Nearly Met: 19.2%, Met: 38.5%, Exceeded: 23.1%)6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2551.3, Students tested: 42, Standard Not Met: 16.7%, Nearly Met: 23.8%, Met: 40.5%, Exceeded: 19.1%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2589.0, Students tested: 40, Standard Not Met: 15.0%, Nearly Met: 15.0%, Met: 37.5%, Exceeded: 32.5%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2632.2, Students tested: 42, Standard Not Met: 7.1%, Nearly Met: 11.9%, Met: 50.0%, Exceeded: 30.9%)California Montessori Project-Shingle Springs Campus School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All55%
- Males50%
- Females60%
- White55%
Math students tested: 289
Math students with scores: 289
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 55% |
State: | 38% |
Standard Not Met:
17.0%Standard Nearly Met:
28.4%Standard Met:
26.6%Standard Exceeded:
28.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2468.6, Students tested: 60, Standard Not Met: 6.7%, Nearly Met: 20.0%, Met: 40.0%, Exceeded: 33.3%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2486.2, Students tested: 53, Standard Not Met: 17.0%, Nearly Met: 35.9%, Met: 28.3%, Exceeded: 18.9%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2510.1, Students tested: 52, Standard Not Met: 26.9%, Nearly Met: 30.8%, Met: 17.3%, Exceeded: 25.0%)6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2530.5, Students tested: 42, Standard Not Met: 26.2%, Nearly Met: 28.6%, Met: 26.2%, Exceeded: 19.1%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2587.7, Students tested: 40, Standard Not Met: 12.5%, Nearly Met: 32.5%, Met: 25.0%, Exceeded: 30.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2613.4, Students tested: 42, Standard Not Met: 14.3%, Nearly Met: 23.8%, Met: 19.1%, Exceeded: 42.9%)California Montessori Project-Shingle Springs Campus School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All71%
- Males64%
- Females78%
- White44%
ELA students tested: 261
ELA students with scores: 261
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 71% |
California: | 48% |
Standard Not Met:
11.0%Standard Nearly Met:
18.0%Standard Met:
34.0%Standard Exceeded:
37.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2484.8, Students tested: 55, Standard Not Met: 13.0%, Nearly Met: 18.0%, Met: 13.0%, Exceeded: 56.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2501.8, Students tested: 52, Standard Not Met: 17.0%, Nearly Met: 15.0%, Met: 29.0%, Exceeded: 38.0%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2525.3, Students tested: 38, Standard Not Met: 13.0%, Nearly Met: 24.0%, Met: 42.0%, Exceeded: 21.0%)6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2577.4, Students tested: 41, Standard Not Met: 7.0%, Nearly Met: 20.0%, Met: 37.0%, Exceeded: 37.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2632.1, Students tested: 42, Standard Not Met: 7.0%, Nearly Met: 5.0%, Met: 38.0%, Exceeded: 50.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2586.9, Students tested: 33, Standard Not Met: 9.0%, Nearly Met: 27.0%, Met: 58.0%, Exceeded: 6.0%)California Montessori Project-Shingle Springs Campus School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All60%
- Males58%
- Females61%
- White50%
Math students tested: 261
Math students with scores: 261
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 60% |
California: | 37% |
Standard Not Met:
14.0%Standard Nearly Met:
26.0%Standard Met:
30.0%Standard Exceeded:
30.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2481.6, Students tested: 55, Standard Not Met: 5.0%, Nearly Met: 16.0%, Met: 40.0%, Exceeded: 38.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2488.1, Students tested: 52, Standard Not Met: 15.0%, Nearly Met: 31.0%, Met: 29.0%, Exceeded: 25.0%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2524.1, Students tested: 38, Standard Not Met: 18.0%, Nearly Met: 29.0%, Met: 29.0%, Exceeded: 24.0%)6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2569.4, Students tested: 41, Standard Not Met: 17.0%, Nearly Met: 24.0%, Met: 24.0%, Exceeded: 34.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2611.4, Students tested: 42, Standard Not Met: 7.0%, Nearly Met: 21.0%, Met: 36.0%, Exceeded: 36.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2564.7, Students tested: 33, Standard Not Met: 24.0%, Nearly Met: 42.0%, Met: 15.0%, Exceeded: 18.0%)California Montessori Project-Shingle Springs Campus School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All63%
- Males57%
- Females68%
- White33%
ELA students tested: 238
ELA students with scores: 238
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 63% |
State: | 44% |
Standard Not Met:
13.0%Standard Nearly Met:
24.0%Standard Met:
37.0%Standard Exceeded:
26.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2448.9, Students tested: 49, Standard Not Met: 12.0%, Nearly Met: 22.0%, Met: 35.0%, Exceeded: 31.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2476.7, Students tested: 39, Standard Not Met: 15.0%, Nearly Met: 33.0%, Met: 33.0%, Exceeded: 18.0%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2525.9, Students tested: 43, Standard Not Met: 21.0%, Nearly Met: 12.0%, Met: 33.0%, Exceeded: 35.0%)6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2568.1, Students tested: 42, Standard Not Met: 12.0%, Nearly Met: 24.0%, Met: 33.0%, Exceeded: 31.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2556.6, Students tested: 36, Standard Not Met: 14.0%, Nearly Met: 31.0%, Met: 53.0%, Exceeded: 3.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2626.1, Students tested: 29, Standard Not Met: 3.0%, Nearly Met: 24.0%, Met: 38.0%, Exceeded: 34.0%)California Montessori Project-Shingle Springs Campus School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All49%
- Males50%
- Females48%
- White27%
Math students tested: 237
Math students with scores: 237
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 49% |
State: | 34% |
Standard Not Met:
17.0%Standard Nearly Met:
34.0%Standard Met:
24.0%Standard Exceeded:
24.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2429.3, Students tested: 49, Standard Not Met: 29.0%, Nearly Met: 24.0%, Met: 29.0%, Exceeded: 18.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2493.2, Students tested: 39, Standard Not Met: 3.0%, Nearly Met: 44.0%, Met: 31.0%, Exceeded: 23.0%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2524.0, Students tested: 43, Standard Not Met: 21.0%, Nearly Met: 35.0%, Met: 19.0%, Exceeded: 26.0%)6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2568.8, Students tested: 42, Standard Not Met: 12.0%, Nearly Met: 38.0%, Met: 19.0%, Exceeded: 31.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2546.6, Students tested: 35, Standard Not Met: 26.0%, Nearly Met: 37.0%, Met: 20.0%, Exceeded: 17.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2620.5, Students tested: 29, Standard Not Met: 10.0%, Nearly Met: 24.0%, Met: 31.0%, Exceeded: 34.0%)California Montessori Project-Shingle Springs Campus School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Paper-based CAASPP:
(State average from 9,784 schools)
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System includes paper-based tests:
California Standards Tests (CSTs) - The CSTs for science in grades five, eight, and ten are administered only to students in California public schools. All questions are multiple-choice. These tests were developed specifically to assess students' knowledge of the California content standards in science.
CST Science students tested: 38
CST Science students with scores: 38
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 68% |
California: | 54% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
0.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
3.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
29.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
45.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
24.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 378.5, Students tested: 38, Far Below Basic: 0.0%, Below Basic: 3.0%, Basic: 29.0%, Proficient: 45.0%, Advanced: 24.0%)
CST Science students tested: 33
CST Science students with scores: 33
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 79% |
State: | 54% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
0.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
6.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
15.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
33.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
45.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 410.3, Students tested: 33, Far Below Basic: 0.0%, Below Basic: 6.0%, Basic: 15.0%, Proficient: 33.0%, Advanced: 45.0%) CST Science students tested: 43
CST Science students with scores: 43
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 74% |
State: | 56% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
0.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
0.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
26.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
47.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
28.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 387.1, Students tested: 43, Far Below Basic: 0.0%, Below Basic: 0.0%, Basic: 26.0%, Proficient: 47.0%, Advanced: 28.0%)
CST Science students tested: 28
CST Science students with scores: 28
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 93% |
California: | 56% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
-1.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
4.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
4.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
21.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
71.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 448.4, Students tested: 28, Far Below Basic: -1.0%, Below Basic: 4.0%, Basic: 4.0%, Proficient: 21.0%, Advanced: 71.0%) CST Science students tested: 42
CST Science students with scores: 42
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 88% |
California: | 60% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
0.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
0.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
12.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
21.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
67.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 430.0, Students tested: 42, Far Below Basic: 0.0%, Below Basic: 0.0%, Basic: 12.0%, Proficient: 21.0%, Advanced: 67.0%)
CST Science students tested: 23
CST Science students with scores: 23
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 96% |
California: | 60% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
0.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
0.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
4.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
30.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
65.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 465.4, Students tested: 23, Far Below Basic: 0.0%, Below Basic: 0.0%, Basic: 4.0%, Proficient: 30.0%, Advanced: 65.0%) The Physical Fitness Test:
The Physical Fitness Test (PFT) for students in California schools is the FITNESSGRAM. The main goal of the test is to help students in starting life-long habits of regular physical activity.
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 52, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 98.1%, Needs Improvement: 1.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 41, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 85.4%, Needs Improvement: 12.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 2.4%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 52, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 82.7%, Needs Improvement: 9.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 7.7%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 41, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 70.7%, Needs Improvement: 26.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 2.5%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 52, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 96.2%, Needs Improvement: 3.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 41, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 100.0%, Needs Improvement: 0.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 52, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 96.2%, Needs Improvement: 3.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 41, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 100.0%, Needs Improvement: 0.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 52, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 75.0%, Needs Improvement: 25.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 41, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 75.6%, Needs Improvement: 24.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 52, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 92.3%, Needs Improvement: 7.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 41, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 75.6%, Needs Improvement: 24.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 38, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 94.7%, Needs Improvement: 2.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 2.7%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 42, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 90.5%, Needs Improvement: 4.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 4.7%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 38, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 76.3%, Needs Improvement: 13.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 10.5%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 42, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 83.3%, Needs Improvement: 11.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 4.8%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 38, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 92.1%, Needs Improvement: 7.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 42, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 92.9%, Needs Improvement: 7.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 38, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 97.4%, Needs Improvement: 2.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 42, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 97.6%, Needs Improvement: 2.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 38, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 89.5%, Needs Improvement: 10.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 42, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 88.1%, Needs Improvement: 11.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 38, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 89.5%, Needs Improvement: 10.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 42, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 90.5%, Needs Improvement: 9.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 43, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 90.7%, Needs Improvement: 9.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 35, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 74.3%, Needs Improvement: 14.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 11.4%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 43, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 81.4%, Needs Improvement: 16.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 2.3%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 35, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 65.7%, Needs Improvement: 20.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 14.3%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 43, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 97.7%, Needs Improvement: 2.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 35, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 100.0%, Needs Improvement: 0.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 43, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 97.7%, Needs Improvement: 2.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 35, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 97.1%, Needs Improvement: 2.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 43, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 86.0%, Needs Improvement: 14.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 35, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 91.4%, Needs Improvement: 8.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 43, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 88.4%, Needs Improvement: 11.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 35, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 97.1%, Needs Improvement: 2.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 42, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 95.2%, Needs Improvement: 4.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 32, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 84.4%, Needs Improvement: 12.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 3.1%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 42, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 88.1%, Needs Improvement: 11.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 32, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 78.1%, Needs Improvement: 9.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 12.5%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 42, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 100.0%, Needs Improvement: 0.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 32, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 96.9%, Needs Improvement: 3.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 42, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 97.6%, Needs Improvement: 2.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 32, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 93.8%, Needs Improvement: 6.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 42, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 90.5%, Needs Improvement: 9.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 32, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 87.5%, Needs Improvement: 12.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 42, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 97.6%, Needs Improvement: 2.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 32, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 96.9%, Needs Improvement: 3.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 45, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 84.4%, Needs Improvement: 13.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 2.3%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 25, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 80.0%, Needs Improvement: 12.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 8.0%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 45, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 73.3%, Needs Improvement: 4.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 22.3%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 25, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 60.0%, Needs Improvement: 12.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 28.0%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 45, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 93.3%, Needs Improvement: 6.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 25, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 100.0%, Needs Improvement: 0.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 45, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 97.8%, Needs Improvement: 2.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 25, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 100.0%, Needs Improvement: 0.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 45, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 86.7%, Needs Improvement: 13.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 25, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 96.0%, Needs Improvement: 4.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 45, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 84.4%, Needs Improvement: 15.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 25, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 88.0%, Needs Improvement: 12.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 43, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 79.1%, Needs Improvement: 18.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 2.3%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 29, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 93.1%, Needs Improvement: 3.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 3.5%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 43, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 72.1%, Needs Improvement: 4.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 23.2%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 29, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 79.3%, Needs Improvement: 10.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 10.4%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 43, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 90.7%, Needs Improvement: 9.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 29, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 100.0%, Needs Improvement: 0.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 43, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 93.0%, Needs Improvement: 7.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 29, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 100.0%, Needs Improvement: 0.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 43, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 60.5%, Needs Improvement: 39.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 29, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 65.5%, Needs Improvement: 34.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 43, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 65.1%, Needs Improvement: 34.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)7th grade:
(Students tested: 29, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 86.2%, Needs Improvement: 13.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
California English Language Development Test:
(State average from 9,882 schools)
Students in kindergarten through grade twelve whose home language is not English are required by law to take an English skills test. In California, the test is called the California English Language Development Test (CELDT).
California Montessori Project-Shingle Springs Campus School - students who met CELDT criterion (all grades)
All Grades:Student Count: 5
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 3
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 60.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 4
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 2
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 50.0% |
California: | 13.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 463.0 |
California: | 365.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 343.3 |
California: | 279.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 422.5 |
California: | 374.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 397.0 |
California: | 285.8 |
All Grades:Student Count: 5
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 4
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 80.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
All Grades:Student Count: 5
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 2
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 40.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
All Grades:Student Count: 4
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 4
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 100.0% |
State: | 35.0% |
All Grades:Student Count: 9
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 7
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 78.0% |
State: | 31.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 6
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 4
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 67.0% |
State: | 8.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 464.3 |
California: | 348.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 358.0 |
State: | 294.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 445.7 |
State: | 345.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 371.7 |
California: | 337.4 |
Accountability
Adequate Yearly Progress:
(State average from 9,846 schools)
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) - Accountability system mandated by federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Statistics are based on test results of the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE), and the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA).
Discuss Shingle Springs, California (CA) on our hugely popular
California forum.
Comments
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: