Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Writing
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-31-2010, 09:55 PM
 
Location: Brendansport, Sagitta IV
8,094 posts, read 15,266,606 times
Reputation: 3753

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mistygrl092 View Post
Anything "on steroids." Honest to God, who coined that stupid phrase?
Someone suffering from prednisone psychosis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-01-2010, 06:09 AM
 
Location: Terra firma
1,372 posts, read 1,554,615 times
Reputation: 1122
without a doubt: conversationalist

Shouldn't it be just conversationist? Why the "al"? You wouldn't call a drummer a percussionalist. I don't care what anybody says it just doesn't sound right.

A close second: People who say "I could care less" when they actually mean "I couldn't care less."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2010, 08:38 PM
 
10,448 posts, read 12,514,082 times
Reputation: 12598
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrandviewGloria View Post
'Orientated'.

'Utilize'
Right there with you. Especially in casual contexts when "use" would do the job just fine.

And "orientate" just sounds stupid. "Orient" just sounds so much better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2010, 08:41 PM
 
10,448 posts, read 12,514,082 times
Reputation: 12598
I know they're polite terms, but when people overuse "sir" and "ma'am," tacking them on the end of every single sentence, or sometimes using them twice in the same sentence. It detracts from what person is actually saying.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2010, 07:07 AM
 
Location: Elsewhere
89,113 posts, read 85,767,866 times
Reputation: 116100
Quote:
Originally Posted by nimchimpsky View Post
I know they're polite terms, but when people overuse "sir" and "ma'am," tacking them on the end of every single sentence, or sometimes using them twice in the same sentence. It detracts from what person is actually saying.
I think that's a cultural/regional thing. In some parts of the country, kids are programmed from childhood to use "sir" and "ma'am" in every sentence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2010, 09:38 AM
 
10,448 posts, read 12,514,082 times
Reputation: 12598
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mightyqueen801 View Post
I think that's a cultural/regional thing. In some parts of the country, kids are programmed from childhood to use "sir" and "ma'am" in every sentence.
I know. I just think it's a little overkill.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2010, 04:05 AM
 
Location: Quincy, Mass. (near Boston)
2,955 posts, read 5,247,771 times
Reputation: 2455
People saying "there IS so many" instead of ARE so many!

"ISN'T there so many idiots speaking improper English vs. AREN'T there so many."

Why can't they use plural when needed? They blurt out the SINGULAR for any phrase, not able to anticipate they'll need the plural?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2010, 06:06 AM
 
8,228 posts, read 14,287,610 times
Reputation: 11239
Plethora. No one used that word till Rumsfeld started using it all the time. Then everyone started using it ALL the time. Ugh. Couldn't stand Rumsfeld. Can't stand suck-up mimics. Every time I hear the word I cringe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2010, 08:17 AM
 
Location: Brendansport, Sagitta IV
8,094 posts, read 15,266,606 times
Reputation: 3753
Quote:
Originally Posted by bostonguy1960 View Post
People saying "there IS so many" instead of ARE so many!

"ISN'T there so many idiots speaking improper English vs. AREN'T there so many."

Why can't they use plural when needed? They blurt out the SINGULAR for any phrase, not able to anticipate they'll need the plural?
Well, if they'd just use AIN'T instead, the problem would go away, since it is both singular and plural. There jes' ain't no reason to distinguish.

'Course, then you get the problem of ignernt yahoos saying "there ain't ANY reason" when everyone knows "there ain't NO reason" is correct.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2010, 02:57 PM
 
113 posts, read 194,088 times
Reputation: 192
I had a boss for years that liked to use the word "caveat" as frequently as possible. He liked to pretend that he went to law school when it was highly doubtful and the closest he probably ever got to the law was his numerous speeding tickets. Everytime he said "caveat" it made me cringe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Writing
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top