Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-19-2022, 03:07 PM
 
12,101 posts, read 17,100,368 times
Reputation: 15776

Advertisements

Believe it or not, the people who most commonly blow through lunch are blue collar workers.

I can't even count how many times I've blown through a day without eating at all.

Or I'm working with guys who knock off for 5 minutes to inhale lunch and the continue working.

OTOH, in the office, yes it's rare not to take a break to grab lunch.

Ironic, but...

Obviously a person can do it if they choose to.

I would also imagine that nurses and doctors blow through lunch all the time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-19-2022, 03:10 PM
 
6,825 posts, read 10,525,326 times
Reputation: 8392
Is your employee an hourly and salary employee - makes a difference. But contrary to the experience of the person above, I know lots of office/white collar staff who work through lunch - for example literally every teacher or school employee I have ever known in my life....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2022, 03:49 PM
 
12,108 posts, read 23,289,909 times
Reputation: 27246
Quote:
Originally Posted by oh-eve View Post
Where do you see in that link it can be waived?

It cannot be waived. It is mandatory. And even if you agree to it and the employee agrees to it - he can later sue you for it if he can prove he never clocked out.
My bad. I just read it again. The 2nd meal break can be waived. Thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2022, 08:06 PM
 
1,871 posts, read 846,051 times
Reputation: 2613
we had one guy, he eat lunch at 11:30, thats fine, I eat at 11:00 to beat the crowd. but he claimed that the work employee manual that lunch was 12;00 to 12:30, he figured that since he was back from lunch at 12:00 and he was working, he should get paid for lunch. 2 1/2 hours overtime a week, even though he ate at 11:30


boss had to come out and say, 30 minutes will be deducted from time, whether you eat or not.


so no you cant work eight hours straight
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2022, 10:33 PM
 
2,117 posts, read 1,324,775 times
Reputation: 6035
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertFisher View Post
Hope we have HR people here. One of my employee wants to work 8 hours straight with no meal break, so to leave early. Putting aside whether the company wants to grant it or not, is the company even allowed by law to grant it?

Based on my research online, under the California Labor Code, employees who work more than five (5) hours in a day are entitled to a thirty (30) minute meal break. Employees who are working more than ten (10) hours in a day must also be given a second thirty (30) minute meal break.

I can't find any reference on whether employees have the right to refuse meal time...
Most employers don't pay for half an hour for meal break.

At my workplace, not to count those in the management, everyone is entitled to a 15-minute break (with pay) for every four hours. Thus, if you work an 8-hour shift, you are supposed to have two 15-minute breaks and one 30-minute meal break. In nursing, for HCAs, they get pay for 7.5 hours each day for an 8-hour shift. Staff nurses get 7.75 hours because they have to stay extra 15 minutes to give reports to the next shift. Office workers, except the salary ones, get 7.5 hours each day also.

Most office workers prefer to take one hour break all together, so they can either go out for lunch or for their appointment near by. Everybody must take their break(s) and not to go home early, unless they have appointment close to the end of their shift sometimes, but not every day.

Not to mention about labour law that employers must offer employees to have 30-minute meal break and other breaks like in the Union, I think it is not right that some employees work straight the whole day and go home early everyday because if or when they go home early, and there's some kind of urgent/sudden work happens for those workers, then who will take care of the work? It's not fair for their co-workers who stay back have to do it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2022, 05:29 AM
 
2,284 posts, read 1,585,712 times
Reputation: 3863
I used to do this in California in the 90s. I didn't take the 30-minute break on my 6 hour shift so I worked a straight 5.5 hours and left. Manager or co-worker clocked me out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2022, 06:45 AM
 
6,460 posts, read 3,983,103 times
Reputation: 17216
So the employee wants to take their break, just at the end of the day rather than in the middle of it. They're not asking to skip it outright. Does the law address *when* the break must be? If not, this sounds more like a matter of company policy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2022, 09:13 AM
 
Location: TN/NC
35,081 posts, read 31,322,562 times
Reputation: 47561
As a salaried employee, I typically take a lunch, but not always. It is not mandatory.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2022, 12:02 PM
 
Location: Redwood Shores, CA
1,651 posts, read 1,305,719 times
Reputation: 1606
My question is for an hourly, non-exempt staff.

From my perspective as manager, even if the law allows, I will have to evaluate whether working 8 hour straight will affect the staff's ability to work in the final hours. For certain energy-consuming jobs, I can see productivity goes down exponentially in the final hours if the staff does not take a meal break.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2022, 12:34 PM
 
24,580 posts, read 10,896,457 times
Reputation: 46931
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertFisher View Post
My question is for an hourly, non-exempt staff.

From my perspective as manager, even if the law allows, I will have to evaluate whether working 8 hour straight will affect the staff's ability to work in the final hours. For certain energy-consuming jobs, I can see productivity goes down exponentially in the final hours if the staff does not take a meal break.
You are also leaving yourself open to other special treatment requests be it from this particular employee or others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top