Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-20-2017, 10:39 AM
 
13,134 posts, read 21,041,486 times
Reputation: 21430

Advertisements

You have nothing and are just grasping for straws.

Notice was properly given under WARN so that argument is out the door.

Even with notice, lay-offs are not absolute; a company can always have changes and end up not having to lay off a person. That is LIFE and REALITY!

Now imagine if they told the co-op board your job was in jeopardy and they broad decided to dump your application. But the company finds a way to save the jobs so there is no lay off; Bet you would be here screaming and whining over not getting the unit and want to find out if you can sure the employer.

Personally, I wish they would just do away with WARN and you'll know your gone when we get rid of you. This advance notice garbage just creates another reason for workers to go all dumb on life.

If you want to see if you're covered under WARN in NY, check here:
NY State WARN NOTICES -current-/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-20-2017, 11:04 AM
 
Location: Paranoid State
13,044 posts, read 13,886,609 times
Reputation: 15839
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoshanarose View Post
I live in New York. I have been working at the same company for 7 years and am a member of the union.

A few days ago, there were dozens of layoffs in my company, and I was one of them.
At my particular work site, we were laid off in order of seniority/time with the agency.
I am the worker with the second least seniority, so I was one of those laid off.
I know, because my manager told me, that this layoff was planned for at least 2 months, but only revealed to us workers and direct supervisors a few days ago.

Unfortunately it is very bad timing for me because just last month my family closed on the purchase of an apartment.
Since it's in NYC, it's a coop apartment, which requires board approval.
Less than two months ago, we had to go through a board approval for the coop, and the coop sent a questionnaire to my job, asking if my job is stable and if my prospects for future employment are good.
Presumably, my company responded in the affirmative, because we were approved for the coop.

However, I strongly suspect that by that time, less than 2 months ago, my company KNEW that my job, in fact, was NOT stable. Yet they lied on the form and answered that it was.
Sorry that happened to you.

Most likely, 2 months ago, no final decision had been made as to the number of people affected and the specific people affected. Until a decision is final, it is not final. Even then it isn't final, as there is most likely a legal review to see if there are disparate impacts -- for example, if it turns out that everyone affected is, say, an African American Female Veteran over the age of 60... well, most likely the business would change its plans because of the disparate impact.

Most likely, the decision wasn't final final final until a week before the layoff, and even then there could have been tweeks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2017, 11:51 AM
 
9,884 posts, read 14,152,674 times
Reputation: 21823
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoshanarose View Post
However, I strongly suspect that by that time, less than 2 months ago, my company KNEW that my job, in fact, was NOT stable. Yet they lied on the form and answered that it was.
I'd be interested to know the exact questions and the exact answers. I can't imagine ANY company guaranteeing future employment. I'm sure their answers indicated that you had been employed for a number of years and were currently employed at the time they were answering questions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2017, 02:45 PM
 
50,925 posts, read 36,618,843 times
Reputation: 76727
Quote:
Originally Posted by spencgr View Post
I'd be interested to know the exact questions and the exact answers. I can't imagine ANY company guaranteeing future employment. I'm sure their answers indicated that you had been employed for a number of years and were currently employed at the time they were answering questions.
I agree with this. It most likely went to HR, who would not know when they filled it out. Even if they did know, maybe they changed their minds about who and how many had to go when they looked at numbers later. Any company has the right to do this. How can any company guarantee you a job for any length of time? If you don't have a contract specifying employment through a certain date, you can't ask for guarantees and expect them to hold any legal weight, they don't.

When I've been at companies where things like this have happened, we may not have known layoffs were imminent, but we usually knew the company wasn't doing that well or that the industry was in a slow phase.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2017, 04:25 PM
 
1,569 posts, read 1,011,603 times
Reputation: 3666
No job is stable...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2017, 04:29 PM
 
3,960 posts, read 3,604,449 times
Reputation: 2025
Quote:
Originally Posted by ocnjgirl View Post
I agree with this. It most likely went to HR, who would not know when they filled it out. Even if they did know, maybe they changed their minds about who and how many had to go when they looked at numbers later. Any company has the right to do this. How can any company guarantee you a job for any length of time? If you don't have a contract specifying employment through a certain date, you can't ask for guarantees and expect them to hold any legal weight, they don't.
We are in a union though.
So there is a contract.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2017, 04:30 PM
 
3,960 posts, read 3,604,449 times
Reputation: 2025
Quote:
Originally Posted by spencgr View Post
I'd be interested to know the exact questions and the exact answers. I can't imagine ANY company guaranteeing future employment. I'm sure their answers indicated that you had been employed for a number of years and were currently employed at the time they were answering questions.
I know the question, because I saw the form.

It said: "Prospects for future employment:"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2017, 04:44 PM
 
13,134 posts, read 21,041,486 times
Reputation: 21430
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoshanarose View Post
We are in a union though.
So there is a contract.
Oh for crying out load. Do you even know what the heck an Employment Contract is? How can you confuse an Employment contract with a Union contract?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2017, 04:56 PM
 
3,960 posts, read 3,604,449 times
Reputation: 2025
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rabrrita View Post
Oh for crying out load. Do you even know what the heck an Employment Contract is? How can you confuse an Employment contract with a Union contract?
No, I don't know what an employment contract is.
How would I know?
If you'd like to explain it, why don't you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2017, 06:55 PM
 
50,925 posts, read 36,618,843 times
Reputation: 76727
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoshanarose View Post
We are in a union though.
So there is a contract.
The contract doesn't say "so and so is employed until at least 2020" though or any time frame. A union contract provides protection against firings and enacts rules...such as when layoffs happen, it goes by seniority. They did that in this case. Nothing in a union contract can prevent layoffs. They can strike if they want, but individually it offers no protection against layoffs as long as they abide by the rule the union sets.

By contract I mean like for traveling therapists. Our contracts guarantee a 13-week assignment, and if the building they are in gets slow, they have to try to find another position in another building or pay the agency and contractor the amount owed by the terms of the contract. I have been in many therapy departments where full-time therapists are sent home if they are slow while temp travelers are guaranteed their 8 hours a day.

This is the difference between a union contract and employment contract. Employment contracts are much more often enacted for temp assignments than long term employment however.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top