Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-23-2010, 05:58 PM
509 509 started this thread
 
6,321 posts, read 7,037,074 times
Reputation: 9444

Advertisements

Most people attribute the difference in attitude to eastern Washington being more rural historically than western Washington.

Even though, eastern Washington is as urban as western Washington now those rural attitudes of character over money and helping your neighbor are still present in those of us that remember the "good old days".

However, I have been reading the Lewis and Clark Journals from 1804 to 1806.

From Patrick Glass (Sargent)..."All the Indians from the Rocky mountains to the falls of Columbia, are an honest, ingenuous and well disposed people, but from the falls to the sea-coast, and along it, they are a rascally, thieving set."

From Lewis "during our stay with them they several times found the knives of the men which had been carelessly lossed by them and returned them. I think we can justly affirm to the honor of these people that they are the most hospitable, honest and sincere people that we have met in our voyage" (near Waitsburg, Walla Walla County, Washington).

Now I can see why Lewis and Clark were not impressed with coastal residents since they were not friendly or honest and very business oriented with their dealings with Lewis and Clark. Sort of like urban residents today.

So is it the Vitamin D?? Must be the sunshine east of the Cascades having the affect on peoples attitudes.

In the early 1800's the population of eastern was much larger than western Washington so it could not have been the crowding.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-23-2010, 08:46 PM
 
2,352 posts, read 2,277,851 times
Reputation: 538
Lolololol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2010, 10:01 PM
 
3,969 posts, read 13,659,817 times
Reputation: 1576
While sunshine is more prevelant in Eastern WA than Western WA, please keep in mind that Eastern WA is not exactly a sunny climate compared with CA, AZ, NV, UT, NM, TX, and many other states. Eastern WA, with the possible exception of the Tri-Cities, is clouded over and fogged in for most of the winter, just like the western side. Vitamin D? Please...not an issue. Especially since most in the west get plenty of it, since they tend to rush out whenever the sun is out and worship the giant orb, even if for only minutes at a time!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2010, 10:02 PM
 
2,352 posts, read 2,277,851 times
Reputation: 538
There is considerable evidence that the people in Eastern Washington suffer from the severe lack of Vitamin I.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2010, 10:11 PM
 
3,969 posts, read 13,659,817 times
Reputation: 1576
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustCallMeTC View Post
There is considerable evidence that the people in Eastern Washington suffer from the severe lack of Vitamin I.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2010, 10:29 PM
 
Location: Aloverton
6,560 posts, read 14,453,208 times
Reputation: 10165
If it were Vitamin D, I'd expect LA and Phoenix (which are pretty sunny) to be warm, neighborly places, instead of the sinkholes of hell that they are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2010, 10:41 PM
 
Location: US Empire, Pac NW
5,002 posts, read 12,354,936 times
Reputation: 4125
Vitamin D, while an essential part of the healthy diet of a human, is not the sole contributor to the difference in attitude. And it depends on perspective. Many "west of the cascades" folks would see people "east of the cascades" as Republican money grubbers and gun-toting idiots, who are well beneath the "more cultured and civilized and intelligent" people west of the cascades. Can't say I agree, though do know a fair number who do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2010, 12:50 AM
 
Location: rain city
2,957 posts, read 12,720,858 times
Reputation: 4973
Quote:
Originally Posted by eskercurve View Post
Many "west of the cascades" folks would see people "east of the cascades" as Republican money grubbers and gun-toting idiots, who are well beneath the "more cultured and civilized and intelligent" people west of the cascades. Can't say I agree, though do know a fair number who do.
I'll take "a gun toting idiot" any day over a Westside whole-wheat-gluten-free-anti-smoking-vegetarian-transvestite. (dressed in a waterproof REI pup tent)

Any.day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2010, 08:05 AM
 
Location: Bellingham, WA
466 posts, read 1,044,685 times
Reputation: 1065
I think a given area's population numbers in relation to the natural resources available influence the people living there.

I'd imagine the indians living in the coastal areas of our state enjoyed much easier lives than their inland counterparts. They had a rich supply of timber, food (both of the seafood/salmon variety and deer) and even tradable commodities such as gold. In comparison, the inland indians had to scrounge to survive.

That being said, it's easy to see the coastal indians found it more advantageous to compete with each other to survive, while the inland indians had to cooperate and rely on each other.

So, I don't think it's the vitamin D that accounts for the differences in attitudes you see between the east and west sides. It's history, and the traits associated with their competition or cooperation roots.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2010, 08:50 AM
 
4,794 posts, read 12,370,711 times
Reputation: 8398
The Comanche and the Apache also got plenty of Vitamin D where they lived in the American Southwest. You could describe them a bit "rascally" as the member of the Lewis and Clark expedition did of the western Washington tribes so I think that blows that theory. Nice try through.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top