Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-20-2010, 12:59 AM
 
1,629 posts, read 2,644,184 times
Reputation: 3512

Advertisements

I am baffled at urban planners/NIMBYs/urban enthusiasts, etc. who want to increase PUBLIC transit. Public transit is a burden to taxpayers with people who don't even think about using transit subsidizing people who do. Why is this okay to people? It's a form of socialistic boondoggle and I don't like it.

There are transit systems in places where the demand does not exist, but yet you have crazed transit addicts doing anything they can to expand taxpayer funded and maintained systems.

If the demand was there, the private sector should be able to step in to run and expand these systems.

I am tired of paying for bus repairs and new bus shelters. This must end. We are not Europe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-20-2010, 07:28 AM
 
6,940 posts, read 9,716,657 times
Reputation: 3153
If you think about it, car commute is a sham also. We could all walk to our destinations.


Road maintenance is also a tax burden.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2010, 07:31 AM
 
18,836 posts, read 37,501,889 times
Reputation: 26471
I take the train to worrk every day. There is no parking at my job. I feel like I am saving money, and reducing air pollution. What is wrong with taking public transportation? I don't contribute to over crowding on highways.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2010, 07:34 AM
 
6,940 posts, read 9,716,657 times
Reputation: 3153
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasper12 View Post
I take the train to worrk every day. There is no parking at my job. I feel like I am saving money, and reducing air pollution. What is wrong with taking public transportation? I don't contribute to over crowding on highways.
Public transportation is safer also.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2010, 08:54 AM
 
9,229 posts, read 8,610,496 times
Reputation: 14780
My goodness, aren't you embarrassed to show such a depth of ignorance? Where do you live, North Dakota? We just traveled the country for two years, and public transit is very much in use -- straining from overuse and under supply, in all the modern urban areas, Seattle (unfortunately) being a rare exception.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2010, 09:19 AM
 
8,682 posts, read 17,368,677 times
Reputation: 4710
I'm sure the OP doesn't mind public funds being used to pay for things like bridges, trolls are generally very fond of them.

The private sector used to own and operate public transit, until government got into the practice of providing taxpayer-funded roads and highways. That unfair, taxpayer-subsidized competition killed off privately-owned transit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2010, 04:09 PM
 
1,164 posts, read 2,067,504 times
Reputation: 819
Quote:
Originally Posted by new2colo View Post
I am baffled at urban planners/NIMBYs/urban enthusiasts, etc. who want to increase PUBLIC transit. Public transit is a burden to taxpayers with people who don't even think about using transit subsidizing people who do. Why is this okay to people? It's a form of socialistic boondoggle and I don't like it.

There are transit systems in places where the demand does not exist, but yet you have crazed transit addicts doing anything they can to expand taxpayer funded and maintained systems.

If the demand was there, the private sector should be able to step in to run and expand these systems.

I am tired of paying for bus repairs and new bus shelters. This must end. We are not Europe.
Just like public roads? OMG. Logic. Horrible. My brain hurts. I can't think. That's not what I mean.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2010, 04:57 PM
 
634 posts, read 1,452,637 times
Reputation: 725
Quote:
Originally Posted by new2colo View Post
I am baffled at urban planners/NIMBYs/urban enthusiasts, etc. who want to increase PUBLIC transit. Public transit is a burden to taxpayers with people who don't even think about using transit subsidizing people who do. Why is this okay to people? It's a form of socialistic boondoggle and I don't like it.

There are transit systems in places where the demand does not exist, but yet you have crazed transit addicts doing anything they can to expand taxpayer funded and maintained systems.

If the demand was there, the private sector should be able to step in to run and expand these systems.

I am tired of paying for bus repairs and new bus shelters. This must end. We are not Europe.
Right, because the private sector always does everything so "ethically" and "cost-efficiently", right? Medicare fraud, much? Unfettered structured finance leading to market collapse, much? And the private sector never lobbies for government assistance in the form of tax credits, huh? The free market is not so "free."

Well, you keep driving your car and polluting, I'll take the train/bus, read my books and magazines, lower my blood pressure, and enjoy what's left of the fresh air as I stroll to the train/bus station. That is, until you and the rest of your anti-mass transit ilk ruin it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2010, 06:58 PM
 
Location: Downtown Detroit
1,497 posts, read 3,503,829 times
Reputation: 930
Quote:
Originally Posted by new2colo View Post
I am tired of paying for bus repairs and new bus shelters. This must end. We are not Europe.
That's right, we're not Europe. We prefer to be obese and live in total isolation, then blame our perceived problems on the wrong people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2010, 07:27 PM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,765,156 times
Reputation: 15184
I'm tired of my taxes paying for highways and multilane high speed roads I don't use
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top