Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > United Kingdom
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-29-2008, 10:59 PM
 
Location: Michigan
29,391 posts, read 55,614,054 times
Reputation: 22044

Advertisements

LONDON, June 29 (UPI) -- Britain's Queen Elizabeth II is looking to buy a new private jet despite recent reports of financial woes at Buckingham Palace, a source says.

The unidentified government source said while previous reports had Buckingham Palace unable to afford maintenance costs, palace officials are spearheading the effort to purchase a new plane for the royals, The Sunday Times of London reported.

Source: Queen Elizabeth wants new plane - UPI.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-10-2008, 05:27 PM
 
Location: On a Long Island in NY
7,800 posts, read 10,111,265 times
Reputation: 7366
Doesent the RAF have a "Royal Flight" in the same manner that we have with the USAF and Air Force One?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2008, 09:33 AM
 
Location: Portsmouth
163 posts, read 320,852 times
Reputation: 73
Quote:
Originally Posted by WIHS2006 View Post
Doesent the RAF have a "Royal Flight" in the same manner that we have with the USAF and Air Force One?
There is a Royal flight, however the Government 'hog' it for themselves and the royals never get to use it, thus, more and more they had to charter one at the last minute because the Government needed it, the royals then were attacked for wasting money on charted private jets while ministers jetted round at taxpayers expence..............so out of her private funds AT NO COST TO THE TAXPAYER the Queen (quite rightly) brought her own.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2008, 01:42 AM
 
Location: The Silver State (from the UK)
4,664 posts, read 8,243,839 times
Reputation: 2862
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldblueeyes01 View Post
There is a Royal flight, however the Government 'hog' it for themselves and the royals never get to use it, thus, more and more they had to charter one at the last minute because the Government needed it, the royals then were attacked for wasting money on charted private jets while ministers jetted round at taxpayers expence..............so out of her private funds AT NO COST TO THE TAXPAYER the Queen (quite rightly) brought her own.
You obviously didn't read the article... It states Some members of the British Parliament have condemned the planned purchase, expected to cost taxpayers between $10 million and $20 million.
"The message it is sending out is jet travel is fine for those who can afford it -- in this case, members of the royal family, thanks to the generosity of the public purse," Parliament Member Norman Baker said.


Apoligies for our Prime Minister travelling to an economic summit.. next time he should go easyjet so that one of the royal buffoons can jet off to monaco
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2014, 08:05 PM
 
14,611 posts, read 17,578,057 times
Reputation: 7783


The Queen's Helicopter flight refers to the only aircraft that is in full time use by the royals. It is not owned outright, but is on a 10 year lease and painted with the livery. Although the Queen finds the helicopter too noisy for long distances, certainly Prince William would not be bothered by a two hour flight, and Prince Charles could learn to suck it up. The helicopter is heavily used by Princess Anne and by Prince Charles as well.


The Queen still has the train given to her for her 25th anniversary. At her advanced age it would be a shame to take it from her, given that it makes it much easier for her to travel with full entourage, a bed, and hospital equipment. Although Charles loves the train, I could see the nation retiring the train upon the death of Elizabeth.

It is unlikely that the royals will ever get a full time fixed wing aircraft. The cost of maintaining a jet capable of trans-continental flight is considerable, and not in keeping with the ethos of the country. Even the ministers do not currently have a jet. Foreign travel is best accomplished by charters involving a plane that is suited to the length and distance of the trip. The Air Force still takes the royals on some flights, but no provision is made to replace their aging VIP jets (roughly 25 years old), and these flights will dip to zero shortly.

As a new generation of faster helicopters becomes available, the British Royals would probably be prime candidates to acquire one.

The helicopter made 143 trips for the royals last year. neys). In addition 51 short charters of helicopters were made, and 49 short domestic charters were made on fixed wing aircraft (less than 10,000 pounds per charter).

More elaborate trips and international trips required more expensive charters as high as a quarter of million pounds for the longest trips.

Ireland keeps a Gulfstream IV for their heads of state and high parliament officials. A G-IV costs $36 million and can fly 4,860 miles (it is 4460 miles from Dublin to Dallas|Fort Worth) and seats 14 people in it's roomiest luxury capacity. Normal domestic transport is handled by helicopter or Beechcraft Super King Air (a turboprop airplane).

Last edited by PacoMartin; 02-05-2014 at 08:30 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2014, 12:55 AM
 
Location: SW France
16,674 posts, read 17,442,775 times
Reputation: 29978
Don't believe everything you hear.

Anyone looking in on the UK forum would think we are obsessed by the Royals.

We aren't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2014, 08:07 AM
 
Location: Glasgow Scotland
18,530 posts, read 18,765,230 times
Reputation: 28794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jezer View Post
Don't believe everything you hear.

Anyone looking in on the UK forum would think we are obsessed by the Royals.

We aren't.
some are, and usuallythe ones who dont have them..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2014, 09:53 AM
 
Location: The Silver State (from the UK)
4,664 posts, read 8,243,839 times
Reputation: 2862
Quote:
Originally Posted by dizzybint View Post
some are, and usuallythe ones who dont have them..

I'm convinced you live in your own little fantasy land
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2014, 10:11 AM
 
Location: SE UK
14,820 posts, read 12,035,458 times
Reputation: 9813
Who here (apart from Ian) actually believes the Queen is the one who wants a new aeroplane?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2014, 11:00 AM
 
Location: The Silver State (from the UK)
4,664 posts, read 8,243,839 times
Reputation: 2862
Quote:
Originally Posted by easthome View Post
Who here (apart from Ian) actually believes the Queen is the one who wants a new aeroplane?
Did I say that she did???? Er, no.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > United Kingdom

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top