Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
LONDON — Emergency plans are being drawn up to remove Prince Harry from serving on the front line in Afghanistan with the British Army after news leaked that he was calling in airstrikes on Taliban positions and going out on foot patrols, according to a report in the Times of London.
LONDON — Emergency plans are being drawn up to remove Prince Harry from serving on the front line in Afghanistan with the British Army after news leaked that he was calling in airstrikes on Taliban positions and going out on foot patrols, according to a report in the Times of London.
I was watching the reports about this on TV last night and couldn't help but be furious about the irresponsible nature of the press who reported this [allegedly an Australian magazine printed it and part of the American press picked it up.] I know they want to print news that they think will sell, but putting people's lives at risk? (not just Prince Harry, everyone serving with him.) Whose side are they on??
I don't know how those people sleep at night, I honestly don't. They should be sent to the front line and disguised as Prince Harry...
I was watching the reports about this on TV last night and couldn't help but be furious about the irresponsible nature of the press who reported this [allegedly an Australian magazine printed it and part of the American press picked it up.] I know they want to print news that they think will sell, but putting people's lives at risk? (not just Prince Harry, everyone serving with him.) Whose side are they on??
I don't know how those people sleep at night, I honestly don't. They should be sent to the front line and disguised as Prince Harry...
I agree, it puts everyone in Jeopardy. But whatever sells seems to be the order of the day for some journalists and to hell with the consequences.
It's irresponsible.
Yes, but if Harry couldn't even notice the camera crew following him around filming, or the photographers taking those wonderful pictures, then maybe he was already putting himself and others at risk?
Yes, but if Harry couldn't even notice the camera crew following him around filming, or the photographers taking those wonderful pictures, then maybe he was already putting himself and others at risk?
No no, all of the Royal's countless PR agents had nothing at all to do with it
Glad you`ve realised. Odd that,,, Never took you for a Monarchist..
Pretty obvious when you think about it though..Putting your life on the line for the last 10 weeks just to get your face in the paper.. Who on earth could think that???
Glad you`ve realised. Odd that,,, Never took you for a Monarchist..
Pretty obvious when you think about it though..Putting your life on the line for the last 10 weeks just to get your face in the paper.. Who on earth could think that???
Your very gullible if you believe that Harry has been putting is 'life on the line' for the last 10 weeks! The saying "he who controls the media controls the mind" kinda comes to mine when I read your posts
Your very gullible if you believe that Harry has been putting is 'life on the line' for the last 10 weeks! The saying "he who controls the media controls the mind" kinda comes to mine when I read your posts
So it was just a `jolly jaunt` with some Gurkha actors for the sake of the cameras then?? Gullibility has never been a problem for me as I always check my facts. Something the paranoid should maybe do a little more of...
I`m just popping over to the other thread now to check on the link you have left me proving your comment of ``Accompanied the WHOLE time by cameras``. You did check your facts and can prove it,,,Didn`t You??
I`ve just checked, and that`s your proof is it,,,You said ``Whole Time``as if you`re saying they were making a documentary,, tut tut very misleading .
They are simply standard news reports. I ask again, Show me proof of ten weeks of ``Whole time`` coverage..I think the term is ``Put up, or,,,,,,,``
Last edited by LINCOLNSHIRE; 02-29-2008 at 05:13 PM..
Reason: add
How about either taking the personal feud to DM, or, better yet, agreeing to disagree and dropping it?
Thanks
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
,,,You said ``Whole Time``as if you`re saying they were making a documentary,, tut tut very misleading 
