Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment > Unemployment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-25-2020, 02:34 PM
 
29 posts, read 30,640 times
Reputation: 55

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by yeahsureright View Post
Ok. They just withheld the money this week and admitted to "withholding" it. Enough is enough. You are obviously just a child home from school. Please leave the adults alone. LOL.

Done with you.
God you’re clueless. They’re no longer advancing money without it being funded.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-25-2020, 06:02 PM
 
Location: Oregon
957 posts, read 540,137 times
Reputation: 635
Quote:
Originally Posted by yeahsureright View Post
Ok. They just withheld the money this week and admitted to "withholding" it. Enough is enough. You are obviously just a child home from school too long and has become bored and antagonistic. Please leave the adults alone. LOL.

Done with you.
So, yeahsureright, first of all... the link you posted in the earlier reply was from May 2018. It has NOTHING to do with current events. Please post current information to support your theories. And really, thats all they are... 'suppositions'.


Secondly... no one said the money was withheld, except you. Nor did anyone 'admit to withholding the money'. SOME people were paid the money early - those that werent, received it, as scheduled. Again, please provide your resources showing anything contrary to this.

Thirdly... As you very clearly said... the Cares act 'suggested' that those with a waiting week, waive it. It was not mandated, and just because Cali and Wa did, does not mean Oregon must. It would be nice - but its not a requirement of the cares act.

Fourth... you state that youre an 'IT professional" and that it doesnt affect you personally. If the UI payments dont affect you, what do you care? Why stir the pot if you have no meat in it?

Fifth.... What does it matter if I brought Gov Brown into it or you or someone else did? It makes no difference to the actual information.

Lastly.... enough with the name calling. Those who have to resort to name calling, only show that they have no valid argument.

Besides, its just plain rude.

Regards
Kacey

Last edited by kaceyellis; 04-25-2020 at 06:03 PM.. Reason: to add
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment > Unemployment

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top