CA Unemployment
I posted this in correctly in California so I am re-posting here.
Background:
I had my phone interview yesterday. On my benefit certification, I understated income earned the first week and and overstated income earned in the second week which is what the phone interviewer lead with. She said they look at the weeks individually. As she went through the interview, it was clear that week one was understated (missing one day of earned income). The other week was overstated.
She did some calculations and said the amount was under $50.00 and penalties are only charged on over payments of $50 or more. Before the phone interview ended, she said the next step--the over payment department would review it and I may or may not receive a letter. I may or may not owe back the amount of over payment. If I did owe it back, they may or may not ask me to pay it back or they may take it out of my remaining benefit. A lot of may or may nots.
It was only after I hung up, that I made the connection the reason week one was understated and week two was overstated, was because I had claimed that one day of income earned in week two instead of week one. I redid the calculation and it is to the penny.
Also, I did some calculations and the amount of over payment in week one is actually $61.00. Based on that, I'm anticipating the possibility of a decision letter saying I owe the $61.00, plus 30% penalty, plus interest, plus the 5 week suspension of benefits. I understand it is nothing personal just how UI rolls. If UI can, they will charge the allowable under the law.
My questions:
1) If I get a decision letter with all of the above penalties, I believe I have a strong case for appeal. It is clear what happened and I had no intention of not reporting the income. I did report it in week two. The total amount of the payment for week one and week two I received combined is only $2.00 more than it would have been if the one day is correctly moved to week one.
I don't know if this is what the phone interviewer saw on her side too and why she was saying the over payment was under $50. Also could it be why she is using all the may and may not statements or are those statements standard procedure?
My only concern is I didn't catch the reason why and the more intricate calculations until after I hung up. So all that is showing in the interview notes is the one understated week the interviewer focused on and the one day not being claimed there. Only a brief acknowledgement on my part that week two had overstated income.
2) If I do not receive any letter and my benefits are still not released for payment (at this point two weeks), what is the appropriate wait time before I should call back and follow-up.
I would appreciate any suggestions on the best way to proceed.