Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-11-2022, 11:22 PM
 
1,915 posts, read 3,237,060 times
Reputation: 1588

Advertisements

Extremely disappointed that the direct Houston to Abilene flight was canceled. There is no longer a reasonable way to travel between Houston and Abilene. Both Houston to San Angelo and Houston to Abilene flights were canceled at the same time.

NOTHING with a direct flight to Houston is in reasonable driving distance. It is easier to drive to Abilene than fly to the nearest location with a direct flight (both DFW and Midland are still > 2.5 hours away). It is faster and easier to drive than taking lousy American Airlines connecting flight through DFW. This turned a simple one hour flight into an ordeal taking the better part of a day regardless of how you get there.

Understand it is not a major market and made sense to cancel either San Angelo or Abilene but NOT both. Both San Angelo and Abilene are in reasonable driving distance of each other to be able to share the flight market.

I think Abilene is the larger market, so it would make sense to have a few direct flights between IAH and Abilene, maybe not many and maybe not even every day, but at least something on a small SkyWest United Express plane.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-12-2022, 08:16 AM
 
Location: Houston, TX
8,319 posts, read 5,478,374 times
Reputation: 12278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Htown2013 View Post
Extremely disappointed that the direct Houston to Abilene flight was canceled. There is no longer a reasonable way to travel between Houston and Abilene. Both Houston to San Angelo and Houston to Abilene flights were canceled at the same time.

NOTHING with a direct flight to Houston is in reasonable driving distance. It is easier to drive to Abilene than fly to the nearest location with a direct flight (both DFW and Midland are still > 2.5 hours away). It is faster and easier to drive than taking lousy American Airlines connecting flight through DFW. This turned a simple one hour flight into an ordeal taking the better part of a day regardless of how you get there.

Understand it is not a major market and made sense to cancel either San Angelo or Abilene but NOT both. Both San Angelo and Abilene are in reasonable driving distance of each other to be able to share the flight market.

I think Abilene is the larger market, so it would make sense to have a few direct flights between IAH and Abilene, maybe not many and maybe not even every day, but at least something on a small SkyWest United Express plane.
There is a massive shortage in pilots right now. This is especially true in the regional market. UA relies more on regional jets than any other airline. This is hitting them quite hard. I dont have access to profitability but loads were very poor on both of those routes. In normal circumstances they may have toughed it out longer but right now they have to be very picky.

IAH also isnt DFW. It never will be. We will never have the type of connectivity that can support such small markets as our friends up north.

UA has cancelled a very large number of routes network wide in the last few months. IAD was the hardest hit at 16 routes gone. Weve lost about 6. DEN and ORD also lost about that amount.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2022, 08:47 AM
 
Location: Houston/Austin, TX
9,847 posts, read 6,566,773 times
Reputation: 6399
Quote:
Originally Posted by As Above So Below... View Post
There is a massive shortage in pilots right now. This is especially true in the regional market. UA relies more on regional jets than any other airline. This is hitting them quite hard. I dont have access to profitability but loads were very poor on both of those routes. In normal circumstances they may have toughed it out longer but right now they have to be very picky.

IAH also isnt DFW. It never will be. We will never have the type of connectivity that can support such small markets as our friends up north.

UA has cancelled a very large number of routes network wide in the last few months. IAD was the hardest hit at 16 routes gone. Weve lost about 6. DEN and ORD also lost about that amount.
American Airlines is losing A LOT more money than United Airlines even with their higher debt.

I’ll be interested to see what happens to the airline industry when investors and government assistance pull the plug on their support.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2022, 09:20 AM
 
Location: Houston, TX
8,319 posts, read 5,478,374 times
Reputation: 12278
Quote:
Originally Posted by ParaguaneroSwag View Post
American Airlines is losing A LOT more money than United Airlines even with their higher debt.

I’ll be interested to see what happens to the airline industry when investors and government assistance pull the plug on their support.
Your first sentence is true, but DFW, CLT, and MIA are not the reasons. Those hubs are super profitable (prior to pandemic anyway). They do poorly in LA and NY. ORD, PHL, and PHX are hit and miss.

The reason AA struggles so much is that their cost of operation is SOOOO much higher than their competitors. Either way, IAH will never be DFW in connectivity which was my original point. DFW can support flights to any tiny town within 1,000 miles. We cant. UA relies on us for connectivity to Latin America and some regional domestic connectivity.

Government assistance is ending but as far as investors go, those will be around forever. All the airlines were profitable in 2019 and thats what will matter in the eyes of investors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2022, 09:41 AM
 
Location: Houston/Austin, TX
9,847 posts, read 6,566,773 times
Reputation: 6399
Quote:
Originally Posted by As Above So Below... View Post
Your first sentence is true, but DFW, CLT, and MIA are not the reasons. Those hubs are super profitable (prior to pandemic anyway). They do poorly in LA and NY. ORD, PHL, and PHX are hit and miss.

The reason AA struggles so much is that their cost of operation is SOOOO much higher than their competitors. Either way, IAH will never be DFW in connectivity which was my original point. DFW can support flights to any tiny town within 1,000 miles. We cant. UA relies on us for connectivity to Latin America and some regional domestic connectivity.

Government assistance is ending but as far as investors go, those will be around forever. All the airlines were profitable in 2019 and thats what will matter in the eyes of investors.
Investors will be around forever but as it comes to airlines, they aren’t what they were pre pandemic. There’s solid evidence on this. The airline industry isn’t going to die (any time soon atleast) but I’m expecting a shake up at the least.

I’m not saying any of this has anything to do with DFW or IAH. I’m just pointing out the difference between these airlines financials. Of the big 3, American loses far more than their 2 counterparts. This obviously can’t last forever and I’m interested to see what will happen as a result.

The airline industry isn’t alone in seeing a shake up. The rest of this year and the next couple of years will showcase the “true” long terms of the pandemic as government assistance and investors continue to pull the plug. The airline industry of course being one of the most impacted but not the only one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2022, 10:35 AM
 
Location: Houston, TX
8,319 posts, read 5,478,374 times
Reputation: 12278
Quote:
Originally Posted by ParaguaneroSwag View Post
Investors will be around forever but as it comes to airlines, they aren’t what they were pre pandemic. There’s solid evidence on this. The airline industry isn’t going to die (any time soon atleast) but I’m expecting a shake up at the least.

I’m not saying any of this has anything to do with DFW or IAH. I’m just pointing out the difference between these airlines financials. Of the big 3, American loses far more than their 2 counterparts. This obviously can’t last forever and I’m interested to see what will happen as a result.

The airline industry isn’t alone in seeing a shake up. The rest of this year and the next couple of years will showcase the “true” long terms of the pandemic as government assistance and investors continue to pull the plug. The airline industry of course being one of the most impacted but not the only one.
I agree there could be a shake up of sorts, but what Im expecting may be different.

AA, DL, UA, and WN arent going anywhere. They are too powerful as entities. What may happen is a route network shake up. AA and DL are notorious for throwing their weight around and that often leads to money losing strategies (especially with AA). But there is a catch: all airlines want to be big in NY and LA but that flying isnt often profitable. But then you also have to fly extensively from those markets in order to win corporate contracts. For example, if you dont fly from LAX to places like BOS, NYC, MCO, WAS, and SEA, you arent going to win any corporate contracts. So they feel pressured to do it even though its money losing.

In the case of AA, they are already burdened with high costs. DL can afford to get away with more because their costs are so much lower. Same with WN. UA tends to stay out of the pissing matches.

In truth what Im expecting is a retrenching into the hub and spoke system. UA is pretty much already there. AA and DL do a lot outside of it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2022, 10:43 AM
 
Location: Houston
5,610 posts, read 4,932,339 times
Reputation: 4553
I believe as of late 2019 UA was going to restart its San Angelo direct flight, I guess that got put on hold?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2022, 10:54 AM
 
Location: Houston/Austin, TX
9,847 posts, read 6,566,773 times
Reputation: 6399
Quote:
Originally Posted by LocalPlanner View Post
I believe as of late 2019 UA was going to restart its San Angelo direct flight, I guess that got put on hold?
They already did but they pulled out mainly (as mentioned by AsBelow) due to the pilot shortage. But also because of the general airline industry’s fall. AAL seems like it doesn’t mind bleeding to death, UAL is being a bit more conservative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2022, 10:58 AM
 
Location: Houston/Austin, TX
9,847 posts, read 6,566,773 times
Reputation: 6399
Quote:
Originally Posted by As Above So Below... View Post
I agree there could be a shake up of sorts, but what Im expecting may be different.

AA, DL, UA, and WN arent going anywhere. They are too powerful as entities. What may happen is a route network shake up. AA and DL are notorious for throwing their weight around and that often leads to money losing strategies (especially with AA). But there is a catch: all airlines want to be big in NY and LA but that flying isnt often profitable. But then you also have to fly extensively from those markets in order to win corporate contracts. For example, if you dont fly from LAX to places like BOS, NYC, MCO, WAS, and SEA, you arent going to win any corporate contracts. So they feel pressured to do it even though its money losing.

In the case of AA, they are already burdened with high costs. DL can afford to get away with more because their costs are so much lower. Same with WN. UA tends to stay out of the pissing matches.

In truth what Im expecting is a retrenching into the hub and spoke system. UA is pretty much already there. AA and DL do a lot outside of it.
Right, I don’t expect a late 2000s type of massive merger. But considering someone is paying for these losses (whether it’s the government, a high stake investor, or a high interest rate long term loan,). The money comes from somewhere. But nonetheless, there’s likely changes to come.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2022, 01:00 PM
 
Location: Houston
5,610 posts, read 4,932,339 times
Reputation: 4553
Quote:
Originally Posted by ParaguaneroSwag View Post
They already did but they pulled out mainly (as mentioned by AsBelow) due to the pilot shortage. But also because of the general airline industry’s fall. AAL seems like it doesn’t mind bleeding to death, UAL is being a bit more conservative.
Oh OK because in 2018-2019 when I was doing work in those areas United did not have a flight to either city. So I guess they started new ones after that, then canceled them with COVID or whatever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top