Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Alright so lets see Spurs get rid of Modric and replace him with one of these players you are talking about and we will see where Spurs end up. Modric is Spurs best player. You clearly dont understand his importance to the team but yoou will once he leaves.
That's all you got? BTW, how many Spurs matches did you watch last year? I caught about 6 to 8 Man U games and would not begin to judge their players on such a small sample.
My old man is a Spurs fan and lives in North London mate. All his family are Tottenham. I have seen a lot of Tottenham last season and over the years to know that Modric is a world class player.
Oh and you caught 6-8 Man Utd games. Thats not a lot at all is it?
My old man is a Spurs fan and lives in North London mate. All his family are Tottenham. I have seen a lot of Tottenham last season and over the years to know that Modric is a world class player.
Oh and you caught 6-8 Man Utd games. Thats not a lot at all is it?
No it's not...
I remember about 3 years ago when many Man U fans had turned on legends Giggs and Scholes, saying they were past it and needed to go. I was surprised at first, but I'm not like them watching every ManU match closely. But I respected there up-to-date opinions and accepted that ManU did have midfielders in better form.
This is no different. Modric was great for awhile but was mostly pants last year. He could turn it around at White Hart Lane but I'd rather he go to Madrid freeing Spurs to buy a big-time striker.
I remember about 3 years ago when many Man U fans had turned on legends Giggs and Scholes, saying they were past it and needed to go. I was surprised at first, but I'm not like them watching every ManU match closely. But I respected there up-to-date opinions and accepted that ManU did have midfielders in better form.
This is no different. Modric was great for awhile but was mostly pants last year. He could turn it around at White Hart Lane but I'd rather he go to Madrid freeing Spurs to buy a big-time striker.
There is no midfielder at Spurs better then Modric. He is the best midfielder at Tottenham and would be a huge loss to Spurs. If you did sell him to Madrid, you would need to spend the money on a replacement rather then a striker. Believe me when I say that Sigurdsson is not a replacement.
There is no midfielder at Spurs better then Modric. He is the best midfielder at Tottenham and would be a huge loss to Spurs. If you did sell him to Madrid, you would need to spend the money on a replacement rather then a striker. Believe me when I say that Sigurdsson is not a replacement.
Bale is better, much more dangerous. And last year Scott Parker was easily better at doing his job than Modric was at doing his.
Bale is not better. They are completely different players. You cant compare the two.
You said Modric was Spurs best midfielder, Bale almost always plays midfield these days. So you invited the comparison. Got something against the Welsh?
You said Modric was Spurs best midfielder, Bale almost always plays midfield these days. So you invited the comparison. Got something against the Welsh?
I have nothing against the Welsh. I am half Welsh myself but Modric is Spurs best all round player. He is so important to the team. He will be a big loss to Tottenham but £40 million is a lot of money. It all depends how you look at it. I think Modric will be Tottenham's loss and Madrid's gain but he might just stay at Spurs because Madrid have not put in a stronger bid.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.