Quote:
Originally Posted by Josseppie
This is good for them but I can't get excited over this as we have the same thing on Mars.
|
Sure we have rovers on Mars, but those are late-comers. The first rover on Mars was Pathfinder's Sojouner Rover on July 6, 1997. There have been 4 rovers on the Moon before Sojourner.
- November 1970. Lunokhod 1, by the Russians.
- December 1972. Lunar Roving Vehicle (Moon Buggy), That was the last one sent to the Moon by the US with Apollo 17. It was human operated.
- January 1973. Lunokhod 2, by the Russians. That was the last for anyone, until now.
It's been 40 years since the last rover landed on the lunar surface. Now that China has successfully put a rover on the Moon, scientifically and technologically it's a pretty big deal. That's not underestimating the missions to Mars though. But the Moon is a very important location, if for no other reason than it's the closest large celestial body to Earth and there's still much to learn about it.
Personally, I'm very impressed with this major accomplishment of the Chinese, especially considering that the Chinese don't have the same degree of experience in space exploration under their belt as the US and Europe does.
Still, I can understand the Moon may not hold the same kind of public awe and fascination as much anymore as it did decades ago and as the missions to Mars do today. Mars has a lot more interesting features, it's more colorful, and it's geological features look more Earth-like in comparison, albeit like a barren desert covered with craters. People usually seem to be more interested in seeing something new.