Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-20-2009, 03:32 PM
 
3 posts, read 18,128 times
Reputation: 10

Advertisements

Is it really that bad in Oakland and Richmond?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-20-2009, 03:48 PM
 
Location: Oakland, CA
1,554 posts, read 5,288,997 times
Reputation: 713
What kind of question is that form "The Oakland Boi"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2009, 04:32 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
5,994 posts, read 20,069,075 times
Reputation: 4078
Quote:
Originally Posted by City Boy View Post
What kind of question is that form "The Oakland Boi"?
LOL. This thread makes absolutely no sense.

Hey guys, how bad is it in Daly City?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2009, 05:13 PM
 
Location: BK
188 posts, read 920,045 times
Reputation: 96
Keep city limits in mind, so somewhere like Los Angeles, which has plenty of high crime neighborhoods, also has some middle class suburban places in the valley, which evens out the numbers somewhat. Richmond and Oakland both hold large poor populations and lack enough better off neighborhoods to skew stats in its favor. If Richmond, El Sobrante, El Cerrito, Albany and Berkeley were one town, the place wouldnt look quite so bad. As that list you are referring to is based on cities with 100k+ populations i believe, the Bay Area could have numerous safe cities as well too, if only places combined (Danville/San Ramon, Lamorinda/Walnut Creek, Livermore/Pleasanton). I agree crime is stubborningly high in Oakland and Richmond and major changes are needed for them to improve, but there are some large flaws in that survey annually released.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2009, 05:19 PM
 
3,098 posts, read 3,783,180 times
Reputation: 2580
if you are someone who likes to hang out on the street corners of west and east oakland after 10pm not safe.
oakland very safe if you like to go to movies ,plays, nightclubs ,upscale dining,farmersmarkets,live music venues.these areas have very good numbers
i have noticed most of the homicides and violence occurs in areas that don't have movie,theaters ,nice restaurants,plays ,nightclubs.so i can't figure out why omeone would be standing around the streetcorners of east oakland
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2009, 12:46 AM
 
709 posts, read 1,766,871 times
Reputation: 351
Quote:
Is it really that bad in Oakland and Richmond?
It must be since they beat out hundreds of other cities in the U.S in order to earn the title of one of the most dangerous cities in the country.

On flip side, San Diego is always making it on the list of top 10 safest big cities in the U.S.

So law enforcement in San Diego is obviously doing something right while the same can't be said for Oakland and Richmond.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2009, 03:06 PM
 
2,957 posts, read 6,471,435 times
Reputation: 1419
Quote:
Originally Posted by skywalker400 View Post
Keep city limits in mind, so somewhere like Los Angeles, which has plenty of high crime neighborhoods, also has some middle class suburban places in the valley, which evens out the numbers somewhat. Richmond and Oakland both hold large poor populations and lack enough better off neighborhoods to skew stats in its favor. If Richmond, El Sobrante, El Cerrito, Albany and Berkeley were one town, the place wouldnt look quite so bad. As that list you are referring to is based on cities with 100k+ populations i believe, the Bay Area could have numerous safe cities as well too, if only places combined (Danville/San Ramon, Lamorinda/Walnut Creek, Livermore/Pleasanton). I agree crime is stubborningly high in Oakland and Richmond and major changes are needed for them to improve, but there are some large flaws in that survey annually released.
The same could be said just as easily for ANY city or area in the country. Half of Oakland is almost completely safe and its stats ARE skewed in its favor. If Oakland was split into two cities with 580 being the dividing line and the top half of it seceding, it would possibly be the most dangerous city of 160,000-200,000 in the nation, easily. Same with Chicago; most of its crime is contained on the South and West sides. This is true of just about anywhere - there are good and bad neighborhoods in every city in this country.

But for cities that have the limits in place that are currently there, Oakland and Richmond rank as dangerous as they do in comparison to other similar-sized cities. Your argument of that East Bay safe zone you gave could just as easily be looked at in the opposite direction by making San Pablo and the Western half of Richmond their own city, which would likely rank in the top three (if not #1) most dangerous cities as well. Comparing the crime of comparable sized neighborhoods and the likelihood of becoming a victim in a particular city are the only ways to get an accurate idea of the danger that exists in a particular city. Richmond I think should be considered even more dangerous due to semi-random freeway shootings every 2 or 3 months. And random crime vs. gang/criminal or domestic crime should be shown as well to get a better understanding.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2009, 03:10 PM
 
2,957 posts, read 6,471,435 times
Reputation: 1419
Quote:
Originally Posted by John McClane View Post
So law enforcement in San Diego is obviously doing something right while the same can't be said for Oakland and Richmond.
Law enforcement is only part of the story. Oakland and Richmond have a larger and deadlier criminal element than San Diego does, as well as having more blighted areas than SD. I'm sure the SD cops do a great job, but the cops' role in lowering homicides comes into play after the homicides have already occurred. If you have rougher areas with a lot of gangbanging and drug dealing like you have in Oakland and Richmond, then the cops there will have a tougher task at hand than the cops in SD.

The current Chief of Police in Richmond came about 2 years ago or so from Fargo, ND where there was only about 1 murder annually. Would you say that the Fargo PD was simply better than the Richmond PD, considering they have the exact same leadership?? No, of course not. The Richmond PD has to deal with all kinds of issues that the Fargo PD has never been faced with. So I wouldn't give all the credit to the SDPD and put all the blame on the Oakland and Richmond PD's. These two cities have their hands fuller than SD does.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2009, 05:02 PM
 
4,127 posts, read 5,065,593 times
Reputation: 1621
Yet another of these threads. Ok the condensed version:

Murdered 4 times last week, all vehicles and recreational toys stolen, dog raped. Yes, it's a freaking terrible place. Everyone should go away.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2009, 06:00 PM
 
15,637 posts, read 26,242,236 times
Reputation: 30932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe_Ryder View Post
Yet another of these threads. Ok the condensed version:

Murdered 4 times last week, all vehicles and recreational toys stolen, dog raped. Yes, it's a freaking terrible place. Everyone should go away.
In Piedmont? You got murdered four times last week in PIEDMONT?

Times must be real tough up there on the hill....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top