Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Sacramento
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-08-2008, 10:19 PM
 
261 posts, read 1,350,834 times
Reputation: 148

Advertisements

I know you may wonder why I'm asking this since I don't totally love Natomas, but I'm also very tired of putting down multiple offers to get them beat out by investors or even Realtors. So I'm now looking at N. Natomas.

Does anyone know what the land plan is South of Elkhorn and East of Natomas Blvd (actually East of Amnest Way) in 95835? I've looked online at the land use maps and have just seen that it is Planned Development Land. But what is the plan? Who owns it? Is it going to be high density housing, low, parks, schools, business, what? Or do we not know yet.

I'm interested in some houses out that way, but a little fearful of what the future holds for that empty land. Anyone know?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-08-2008, 10:36 PM
 
261 posts, read 1,350,834 times
Reputation: 148
Ok. I did some more research, and it seems like it was going to be a big junior high and high school in the new Twin Rivers Unified School District, but the plans were made and building was started with Grant District. Now who knows what the land will be. Does it mean that the new Twin Rivers district owns the land?

Also, I noticed that it was in the "panhandle." Is that good or bad?

Education - New district criticizes Grant over new campus - sacbee.com (http://www.sacbee.com/education/story/836239.html - broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2008, 11:58 PM
 
8,673 posts, read 17,279,161 times
Reputation: 4685
The levees in Natomas are being downgraded from 100 year protection to 20 year protection. Whatever anyone plans on putting there, it has to be on top of a 9-foot tall berm until the levees get reinforced to a 100 year level and recertified.

The "panhandle" isn't in the city of Sacramento, it is undergoing annexation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Sacramento
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top