Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > Rochester area
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-22-2022, 11:22 AM
 
5,679 posts, read 4,081,937 times
Reputation: 4985

Advertisements

Rather than looking in the mirror, the city blames others for gun violence. Amazing.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/ci...322b5dd74adf39
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-22-2022, 11:28 AM
 
93,197 posts, read 123,783,345 times
Reputation: 18253
"The City of Rochester on Wednesday sued a host of companies in the firearms industry, alleging that the companies are fueling the violence in the city.

"The suit seeks to hold manufacturers, makers, importers, and distributors of firearms responsible for the illegal and unreasonable sale, manufacture, distribution, importing, and marketing of firearms," the city said in a statement Tuesday. "The City seeks compensatory and punitive damages, the creation of an abatement fund, and reimbursement of attorneys’ fees."

The City of Buffalo filed a similar lawsuit Tuesday in state Supreme Court, and Rochester is being assisted by the same law firm, Napoli Shkolnik PLLC. The lawsuits largely mirror each other,.

"The Defendants, such as Beretta, Smith & Wesson, Glock, Remington and Bushmaster, and Ghost Gun companies like Polymer 80 and Arm or Ally, manufactured or distributed thousands of firearms recovered in crimes committed in the City of Rochester and New York State," the statement read.

So-called "ghost guns" are untraceable and typically sold in parts to be manufactured.

Rochester, like many cities across the country, has seen a significant increase in gun-related violence and homicides in recent years. What is propelling the surge may not be known for years, if ever. Among the reasons highlighted by social service and criminal justice experts, as well as law enforcement, are the isolation of the pandemic and recent criminal justice measures. The latter, such as bail reform, are hot button issues and the limited available data is being wielded by all sides of the debate as evidence of their stance.

The availability of firearms has also been highlighted, and that, coupled with state legislation that was the offspring of the violence, is the foundation of the lawsuits.

Last year, state lawmakers approved a "nuisance law" that attempts to permit civil lawsuits to be brought against gun manufacturers and dealers. Typically, the firearms industry has had a blanket immunity to much litigation but this law, already affirmed by one federal court, attempts to circumvent that immunity.

A rash of mass killings has increased public support for gun control measures, some polling shows. Western New York Now has its own horrific trauma, with the May massacre of 10 Black people at a supermarket in Buffalo, a mass shooting by a racist 18-year-old.

Key section: “Addressing gun violence is a top priority of my administration, and I want to tackle this issue on every front,” said Rochester Mayor Malik Evans. “Violence prevention requires a multitude of strategies and a significant amount of collaboration. This is just the latest tactic I will dedicate to eradicating gun violence in Rochester."

In a statement to CNN, one of the defendants, Bushmaster Firearms Industries, said, “We have not had a chance to review the allegations in full at this time, but upon first blush, the verified allegations against Bushmaster Firearms Industries, Inc. are false. Our counsel is currently reviewing the complaint and evaluating a path forward to address both this lawsuit and the potentially libelous claims made against Bushmaster Firearms Industries, Inc."

The firearms litigation could ultimately reach the Supreme Court, as already there are dueling federal opinions around laws like New York's "nuisance" law.

The lawsuits contend that firearms manufacturers and others have avoided protective measures to keep guns from falling into the hands of criminals, and have ignored if not exacerbated the illegal trafficking of firearms.

Robert Spitzer, a State University of New York at Cortland professor who has authored six books on gun policy, said that the lawsuit from families who lost loved ones in the Sandy Hook mass killing laid the foundation for similar litigation.

In that mass shooting, 20 first graders and six adults were fatally shot at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, on Dec. 14, 2012. The families of nine students sued Remington, the manufacturer of the AR-15 used in the crime, and alleged that the company used marketing that appealed to troubled individuals.

The lawsuit settled for $73 million.

"The big thing about the Connecticut case was that it settled," Spitzer said. "It did not go to the bitter end and end in a trial."

Connecticut laws gave room for the litigation, navigating around federal immunity laws for gun manufacturers. For those suing, and those being sued, the legal war is often waged over efforts during litigation to unearth internal discussions with the manufacturers and marketers.

Spitzer likened the gun-related lawsuits to those that led to highly embarrassing revelations about the tobacco industry.

"Even though that (Connecticut) suit didn’t actually follow a whole trial process, it’s a big headache for the company," Spitzer said. "It's a way for the people who bring these suits to get information about the marketing that these gun companies use.

"In many ways the process is more important than the outcome."

Last edited by ckhthankgod; 12-22-2022 at 12:11 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2022, 01:05 PM
 
5,679 posts, read 4,081,937 times
Reputation: 4985
Quote:
Originally Posted by ckhthankgod View Post
"The City of Rochester on Wednesday sued a host of companies in the firearms industry, alleging that the companies are fueling the violence in the city.

"The suit seeks to hold manufacturers, makers, importers, and distributors of firearms responsible for the illegal and unreasonable sale, manufacture, distribution, importing, and marketing of firearms," the city said in a statement Tuesday. "The City seeks compensatory and punitive damages, the creation of an abatement fund, and reimbursement of attorneys’ fees."

The City of Buffalo filed a similar lawsuit Tuesday in state Supreme Court, and Rochester is being assisted by the same law firm, Napoli Shkolnik PLLC. The lawsuits largely mirror each other,.

"The Defendants, such as Beretta, Smith & Wesson, Glock, Remington and Bushmaster, and Ghost Gun companies like Polymer 80 and Arm or Ally, manufactured or distributed thousands of firearms recovered in crimes committed in the City of Rochester and New York State," the statement read.

So-called "ghost guns" are untraceable and typically sold in parts to be manufactured.

Rochester, like many cities across the country, has seen a significant increase in gun-related violence and homicides in recent years. What is propelling the surge may not be known for years, if ever. Among the reasons highlighted by social service and criminal justice experts, as well as law enforcement, are the isolation of the pandemic and recent criminal justice measures. The latter, such as bail reform, are hot button issues and the limited available data is being wielded by all sides of the debate as evidence of their stance.

The availability of firearms has also been highlighted, and that, coupled with state legislation that was the offspring of the violence, is the foundation of the lawsuits.

Last year, state lawmakers approved a "nuisance law" that attempts to permit civil lawsuits to be brought against gun manufacturers and dealers. Typically, the firearms industry has had a blanket immunity to much litigation but this law, already affirmed by one federal court, attempts to circumvent that immunity.

A rash of mass killings has increased public support for gun control measures, some polling shows. Western New York Now has its own horrific trauma, with the May massacre of 10 Black people at a supermarket in Buffalo, a mass shooting by a racist 18-year-old.

Key section: “Addressing gun violence is a top priority of my administration, and I want to tackle this issue on every front,” said Rochester Mayor Malik Evans. “Violence prevention requires a multitude of strategies and a significant amount of collaboration. This is just the latest tactic I will dedicate to eradicating gun violence in Rochester."

In a statement to CNN, one of the defendants, Bushmaster Firearms Industries, said, “We have not had a chance to review the allegations in full at this time, but upon first blush, the verified allegations against Bushmaster Firearms Industries, Inc. are false. Our counsel is currently reviewing the complaint and evaluating a path forward to address both this lawsuit and the potentially libelous claims made against Bushmaster Firearms Industries, Inc."

The firearms litigation could ultimately reach the Supreme Court, as already there are dueling federal opinions around laws like New York's "nuisance" law.

The lawsuits contend that firearms manufacturers and others have avoided protective measures to keep guns from falling into the hands of criminals, and have ignored if not exacerbated the illegal trafficking of firearms.

Robert Spitzer, a State University of New York at Cortland professor who has authored six books on gun policy, said that the lawsuit from families who lost loved ones in the Sandy Hook mass killing laid the foundation for similar litigation.

In that mass shooting, 20 first graders and six adults were fatally shot at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, on Dec. 14, 2012. The families of nine students sued Remington, the manufacturer of the AR-15 used in the crime, and alleged that the company used marketing that appealed to troubled individuals.

The lawsuit settled for $73 million.

"The big thing about the Connecticut case was that it settled," Spitzer said. "It did not go to the bitter end and end in a trial."

Connecticut laws gave room for the litigation, navigating around federal immunity laws for gun manufacturers. For those suing, and those being sued, the legal war is often waged over efforts during litigation to unearth internal discussions with the manufacturers and marketers.

Spitzer likened the gun-related lawsuits to those that led to highly embarrassing revelations about the tobacco industry.

"Even though that (Connecticut) suit didn’t actually follow a whole trial process, it’s a big headache for the company," Spitzer said. "It's a way for the people who bring these suits to get information about the marketing that these gun companies use.

"In many ways the process is more important than the outcome."
Funny, I NEVER get gun marketing. Maybe that's because you don't get it until YOU start looking for a gun. Where are the job opportunities so these people don't have time to get in trouble? Where is the education, that the city is obligated by law to provide? And finally, where are the parents, who have failed miserably?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2022, 01:24 PM
 
93,197 posts, read 123,783,345 times
Reputation: 18253
Quote:
Originally Posted by JWRocks View Post
Funny, I NEVER get gun marketing. Maybe that's because you don't get it until YOU start looking for a gun. Where are the job opportunities so these people don't have time to get in trouble? Where is the education, that the city is obligated by law to provide? And finally, where are the parents, who have failed miserably?
Perhaps it is more complicated, as many may actually work, are adults, are students that go to school, etc. I think the point of the highlighted portions is that this is just one aspect of many and the mayor even says so himself.

In fact, here is Rochester homicide data for this year and going back to 2013: https://data-rpdny.opendata.arcgis.c...micide-victims

Just to show what people in the community are doing: https://www.whec.com/rochester-in-fo...s-dec-18-2022/

https://www.whec.com/rochester-in-fo...s-dec-11-2022/

https://www.whec.com/rochester-in-fo...us-dec-4-2022/

https://www.whec.com/rochester-in-fo...s-nov-27-2022/

Last edited by ckhthankgod; 12-22-2022 at 01:43 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2022, 06:59 PM
 
5,679 posts, read 4,081,937 times
Reputation: 4985
Quote:
Originally Posted by ckhthankgod View Post
Perhaps it is more complicated, as many may actually work, are adults, are students that go to school, etc. I think the point of the highlighted portions is that this is just one aspect of many and the mayor even says so himself.

In fact, here is Rochester homicide data for this year and going back to 2013: https://data-rpdny.opendata.arcgis.c...micide-victims

Just to show what people in the community are doing: https://www.whec.com/rochester-in-fo...s-dec-18-2022/

https://www.whec.com/rochester-in-fo...s-dec-11-2022/

https://www.whec.com/rochester-in-fo...us-dec-4-2022/

https://www.whec.com/rochester-in-fo...s-nov-27-2022/
Not complicated at all. If only the apologetics would realize that they are making things worse by blaming others. Look in the Mirror and stop blaming others
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2022, 08:16 PM
 
93,197 posts, read 123,783,345 times
Reputation: 18253
Quote:
Originally Posted by JWRocks View Post
Not complicated at all. If only the apologetics would realize that they are making things worse by blaming others. Look in the Mirror and stop blaming others
I don’t it is a “one or the other” game. I think they are approaching this from various angles, including private/community options as well. Think of it as more of an “all hands on deck” approach.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2022, 06:07 AM
 
Location: western NY
6,414 posts, read 3,128,516 times
Reputation: 10055
Quote:
Originally Posted by JWRocks View Post
Funny, I NEVER get gun marketing. Maybe that's because you don't get it until YOU start looking for a gun. Where are the job opportunities so these people don't have time to get in trouble? Where is the education, that the city is obligated by law to provide? And finally, where are the parents, who have failed miserably?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JWRocks View Post
Not complicated at all. If only the apologetics would realize that they are making things worse by blaming others. Look in the Mirror and stop blaming others
Bingo..........right on..............I agree, 100%


Furthermore, why "handcuff" the law abiding citizens, who, in some cases, simply enjoy going to a gun range and enjoy the challenge of shotting some "clay pigeons" out of the air or targets off a wooden beam? It's becoming quite clear, that law enforcement is becoming overwhelmed by the "bad actors", and sadly, the "common man" is finding that protection from the violently motivated, is going to be a personal thing. The Police can't be EVERYWHERE, ALL OF THE TIME.

It's getting pretty rough, out there, yet the "tunnel visioned politicians" continue to think that by restricting the law abiding citizens from owning firearms, that will make them safer. Good luck with that!!

Like the old saying goes, "Why do you carry a gun"?




Answer, "Because a Police Officer is too heavy"................................
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2022, 07:16 AM
 
93,197 posts, read 123,783,345 times
Reputation: 18253
Quote:
Originally Posted by leadfoot4 View Post
Bingo..........right on..............I agree, 100%


Furthermore, why "handcuff" the law abiding citizens, who, in some cases, simply enjoy going to a gun range and enjoy the challenge of shotting some "clay pigeons" out of the air or targets off a wooden beam? It's becoming quite clear, that law enforcement is becoming overwhelmed by the "bad actors", and sadly, the "common man" is finding that protection from the violently motivated, is going to be a personal thing. The Police can't be EVERYWHERE, ALL OF THE TIME.

It's getting pretty rough, out there, yet the "tunnel visioned politicians" continue to think that by restricting the law abiding citizens from owning firearms, that will make them safer. Good luck with that!!

Like the old saying goes, "Why do you carry a gun"?




Answer, "Because a Police Officer is too heavy"................................
This doesn't have impact on law abiding gun owners. This is more or less a way to see what culpability do gun manufacturers have in regards to gun violence. The thing is that this is nuanced, as you can have guns that are stolen, whether internally or externally and then become "community guns" that are stored in trash cans, creek/river beds, etc. for people to use. I mention this, as there was an example in Syracuse where a guy with a drug problem from a nearby rural town stole his father's guns and used them as collateral in drug deals and that gun was involved in multiple shootings. That's an example of how you can end up having "community guns".

Also, as the information about homicide victims shows, the vast majority are adults, whether young or old. So, there appears to be more of a personal responsibility aspect involved.

Again, this isn't being viewed as being THE solution, but a part of the solution to reducing/eliminating gun violence, which the mayor himself stated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2022, 08:11 AM
 
5,679 posts, read 4,081,937 times
Reputation: 4985
Quote:
Originally Posted by ckhthankgod View Post

Also, as the information about homicide victims shows, the vast majority are adults, whether young or old. So, there appears to be more of a personal responsibility aspect involved.

.
I've been saying this forever. Glad to see you're starting to get it
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2022, 08:13 AM
 
93,197 posts, read 123,783,345 times
Reputation: 18253
Quote:
Originally Posted by JWRocks View Post
I've been saying this forever. Glad to see you're starting to get it
I've always said that. So, let's get that straight.

My point still stands that this is basically one aspect of a multiprong attack on the violence. That's all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > Rochester area

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top