Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-06-2015, 07:19 AM
 
Location: Central Massachusetts
6,589 posts, read 7,102,503 times
Reputation: 9334

Advertisements

Tax Planning Before Turning 70: What You Should Know About RMDs

Tax Planning Before Turning 70: What You Should Know About RMDs | Lewitt Hackman - JDSupra

This is a very small and to the point posting on the net that everyone here should know. It has been spoken of and I have said it myself a few times here as well and to my friends. This is what it says.

Quote:

RMDs: The Devil in the Details

Keep in mind:

1. Defined Contribution Account owners may be able to wait until retirement to file a report.

2. Those who turned 70 ½ in 2015 must report a RMD before April 1, 2016 – unless they turned that age in the first half of the year. If that’s the case, the first RMD report must be made before December 31st of this year.

3. First year reporters who wait to report in April will be required to report twice (which could raise tax obligations) because they are required to report an RMD again before December 31st. This is why it’s important to begin tax planning for RMDs at age 69.
After the first year, IRA owners are required to report annually by year’s end.

4. Life expectancies of the taxpayer and the taxpayer’s spouse will play a factor. See the IRS’s resources for calculating RMDs for more information, but it essentially comes down to the taxpayer’s account balance the preceding year’s end, divided by an IRS life expectancy factor.

5. Taxpayers who have forgotten to take RMDs in the past should take all of them as soon as possible, because of the excise tax mentioned above.

Retirees and other tax payers who don’t need their RMDs might consider reinvesting those funds into a Roth IRA, which won’t require withdrawals until after the account owner passes, or a grandchild’s 529 college savings account. And there are other planning tools available to help reduce your taxable estate. Simply speak with your accountant or trusts & estates attorney for more information.

Last edited by oldsoldier1976; 12-06-2015 at 07:49 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-06-2015, 07:33 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,016 posts, read 20,926,886 times
Reputation: 32530
^^^^^ How could taxpayers have "forgotten" to take RMD's? I thought the investment companies were required by law to calculate the RMD's and send them to you. I must be mistaken.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2015, 07:40 AM
 
106,846 posts, read 109,114,600 times
Reputation: 80283
Will Fidelity send me my MRD automatically?

Yes, if you enroll in our automatic withdrawals process, Fidelity will automatically recalculate your MRD each year, and distribute that amount based on your instructions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2015, 07:55 AM
 
1,536 posts, read 2,427,564 times
Reputation: 4198
Just set mine up with Fidelity last week. December 8th will be my date until the end of my time. Good timing for gifting the kids for Christmas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2015, 07:57 AM
 
Location: Central Massachusetts
6,589 posts, read 7,102,503 times
Reputation: 9334
The trouble is if you have multiple accounts with multiple companies you will get those but must add all account balances together then determine your RMD. There are a lot of people that have only one account as well as a lot of people that have multiple. The mistakes are made mainly by those that have multiple. Also in the case of married folks both of their accounts are taken into that same picture. This is even more tricky depending on ages of the couple and whether or not one is retired and the other is working.

Here is a link to a PDF that helps explain this.

https://www.mfs.com/wps/FileServerSe...ommand=default
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2015, 08:12 AM
 
106,846 posts, read 109,114,600 times
Reputation: 80283
had i known years ago that the rmd's were a combo of my age and my wife's i would have canvased the local colleges for my choice in a wife .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2015, 08:41 AM
 
Location: Central Massachusetts
6,589 posts, read 7,102,503 times
Reputation: 9334
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
had i known years ago that the rmd's were a combo of my age and my wife's i would have canvased the local colleges for my choice in a wife .



LOL

Alpine Prince has bragged on his college aged wife. Maybe he is onto something.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2015, 09:20 AM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,789,738 times
Reputation: 16993
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
had i known years ago that the rmd's were a combo of my age and my wife's i would have canvased the local colleges for my choice in a wife .
Is this true? Does the wife has to be at least 10 years younger? I thought RMD is just base on my husband's age only. Because I have my own IRA.
Anyway I plant to use one small IRA in the first 2 years. That leaves only one IRA for Vanguard to take care, much easier to do RMD. That's how I deal with multiple accounts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2015, 09:22 AM
 
106,846 posts, read 109,114,600 times
Reputation: 80283
yes , the chart is for a wife up to 10 years younger there is another chart if more than 10 years younger . no problem if i hit those colleges

Last edited by mathjak107; 12-06-2015 at 09:32 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2015, 09:24 AM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,789,738 times
Reputation: 16993
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
no , regardless of age it is based on a combo
Thank you, this is something new for me. I need to go read the link.

Edit to add that you can use the joint survivor expectancy is your spouse is 10 years younger, otherwise use the single life expectancy. Since my husband is not 10 years older, I can't use that table, where am I missing?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top