Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-28-2015, 10:38 PM
 
16,393 posts, read 30,273,687 times
Reputation: 25502

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by nicet4 View Post
I don't know why anyone would want to live in a community where children, and their laughter, is banned.

To each his own but I wouldn't want a place there. Nothing bug old foggies?


1) Children are NOT banned. Nearly every one of the residents have a number of grandchildren and great- grandchildren who visit. The local school is staffed by teachers and volunteers who live within this community.

2) Why would you want to have a child in a 55+ community? There are very few children or playmates within the community.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-28-2015, 11:00 PM
 
3,438 posts, read 4,452,517 times
Reputation: 3683
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss20ts View Post
But that was the choice you made. You didn't move to a 100% 55+ community. If you did and the rules were being bent left and right, chances are high that you along with your neighbors would be very upset. Not everyone wants to live around kids especially as they age. There's something to be said about peace and quiet. There's absolutely nothing wrong with "blue hairs". Sure beats the alternative!
The alternative of being younger?

Some people don't like being reminded of disability so they discriminate against the disabled.
Some people don't like seeing children - it's a reminder that their youth is gone.
Both are reminders of infirmity and mortality and these people somehow think if they don't see it life will just go on as is forever. HOAs don't protect you from any of those things nor do they "preserve property value" Hopefully "55+ only" will not be tolerated in the context of home ownership and be minimally tolerated in the context of rental property only.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2015, 05:09 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,172 posts, read 26,189,754 times
Reputation: 27914
Quote:
Originally Posted by IC_deLight View Post
The alternative of being younger?

Some people don't like being reminded of disability so they discriminate against the disabled.
Some people don't like seeing children - it's a reminder that their youth is gone.
Both are reminders of infirmity and mortality and these people somehow think if they don't see it life will just go on as is forever. HOAs don't protect you from any of those things nor do they "preserve property value" Hopefully "55+ only" will not be tolerated in the context of home ownership and be minimally tolerated in the context of rental property only.
Oh fercrissaakes....how ridiculous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2015, 05:14 AM
 
Location: Arizona
8,270 posts, read 8,650,554 times
Reputation: 27674
Quote:
Originally Posted by old_cold View Post
Oh fercrissaakes....how ridiculous.
He's against anything that says HOA. Ignore him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2015, 06:44 AM
 
3,438 posts, read 4,452,517 times
Reputation: 3683
Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkalot View Post
He's against anything that says HOA. Ignore him.
Restrictive covenants are not the same as "an HOA".
It's pretty sad when you think it's great to use restrictive covenants to discriminate against children, disabled folks, and people younger than 55. People in these places eat their own. When Sally needs a ramp because she can't use steps any more, she has to get "permission" from the architectural review committee. They won't like signs of disability.

I'm perfectly content with the knowledge that these places will mostly fall under their own design.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2015, 06:59 AM
 
31,683 posts, read 41,034,158 times
Reputation: 14434
Quote:
Originally Posted by IC_deLight View Post
Restrictive covenants are not the same as "an HOA".
It's pretty sad when you think it's great to use restrictive covenants to discriminate against children, disabled folks, and people younger than 55. People in these places eat their own. When Sally needs a ramp because she can't use steps any more, she has to get "permission" from the architectural review committee. They won't like signs of disability.

I'm perfectly content with the knowledge that these places will mostly fall under their own design.
So until the fall the many residents are living the Bada Bing life or else they move. Thus is the nature of free and open markets we are the ones who seek the land underneath us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2015, 07:34 AM
 
11,175 posts, read 16,014,540 times
Reputation: 29925
Quote:
Originally Posted by IC_deLight View Post
I don't like HOAs! HOAs are bad! HOAs are horrible! HOAs are terrible! HOAs are totalitarian! Did I mention that I don't like HOAs?
Yeah, yeah, we get it. You obviously did a word search on HOAs, found a thread on the Retirement Forum that contained HOA in the title, and voila!, here you are. I see that you did the very same thing in June, the only other time that you visited the Retirement Forum. In fact, I see that your very first post ever on City-Data in January 2008, (2008!) was a complaint about HOAs.

Don't you think that it's finally time to give it a rest?

Or perhaps you should just take note of my status message.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2015, 07:45 AM
 
1,042 posts, read 873,813 times
Reputation: 6639
I am sad that the parent may no longer be in a position to help their disabled adult child and her children. I am sad that the community, as a caring community [hopefully] did not search for or create a way to accommodate for special circumstances. Yes. I know. There are rules. If an exception is made for one then it will create a precedent.

I coordinate a by and for Autistic retreat once a year. Because of our sensory isssues, we do have some pretty strict rules to maintain "Autistic Space." No flash cameras. No fragrance full skin or hair products. No fluorescent lights. Total respect for signals on interaction badges. And, there are many more.

We have strict rules for maintaining peace and quiet....BUT when a child [or adult] has a need for screaming or barking or whatever, rules are put aside, because compassion and understanding for others is always more important than any rule. I find this all so sad. That's all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2015, 08:11 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
19,480 posts, read 25,145,293 times
Reputation: 51118
Quote:
Originally Posted by vicky3vicky View Post
I am sad that the parent may no longer be in a position to help their disabled adult child and her children. I am sad that the community, as a caring community [hopefully] did not search for or create a way to accommodate for special circumstances. Yes. I know. There are rules. If an exception is made for one then it will create a precedent.

I coordinate a by and for Autistic retreat once a year. Because of our sensory isssues, we do have some pretty strict rules to maintain "Autistic Space." No flash cameras. No fragrance full skin or hair products. No fluorescent lights. Total respect for signals on interaction badges. And, there are many more.

We have strict rules for maintaining peace and quiet....BUT when a child [or adult] has a need for screaming or barking or whatever, rules are put aside, because compassion and understanding for others is always more important than any rule. I find this all so sad. That's all.
While I have great compassion for people with disabilities, after all I was a special education teacher for over 30 years, I strongly disagree with your post.

If the grandparent needs care and that means that children under age 19 are part of the package they need to move to a place that allows children.

Once one "special exemption" is made there will be a request for a second and a third and a fourth and a tenth, etc. etc.

My MIL told me that something similar happened in the over 55 complex where she purchased a condo. Apparently, it started with one "special exemption" in a similar circumstance, someone caring for an elderly parent and they had a disabled child (or the parent was disabled or something). My MIL said that it "opened the floodgates". Soon there were more people requesting "special exemptions" and then just more and more people ignoring the rules and just moving in with their over 55 parents with their under 18 children.

The straw that broke the camel's back ended up being a woman who moved in with her mother and brought along, I believe, four pre-teen children. The mom & grandma insisted that they should get a "special exemption", too.

Numerous, numerous homeowners complained (not just about the family with four kids but about all of the underage kids living there) and many homeowners moved out and finally management buckled down and started to follow the official rules (this was before my MIL moved in). My MIL said that the majority of the residents were very, very happy once the rules were being followed.

Of course, this is just one example, but I could easily imagine it happening again. And,as my MIL reported to me, it started with just one "special exemption" (at least that is what the neighbors living there at the time told her).

Last edited by germaine2626; 10-29-2015 at 08:27 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2015, 11:07 AM
 
16,711 posts, read 19,407,583 times
Reputation: 41487
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFBayBoomer View Post
Now I will likely scratch all 55+ communities totally off my list. I was of the impression from a nice 55+ community I visited that the only exception to the 55 yr. old age minimum was for the spouse.

Aren't there 55+ communities that restrict household number to just two adults, one of which must be 55+? That's the only sort of 55+ community that would interest me.
Same here. If I am living in a retirement community, I damn sure don't want kids and immature adults living there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top