Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-06-2007, 10:31 AM
 
Location: Santa Monica
4,714 posts, read 8,461,458 times
Reputation: 1052

Advertisements

"Abortion isn't a religious issue" by Garry Wills
Abortion isn't a religious issue - Los Angeles Times

He makes several claims in this essay:

* "But is abortion murder? Most people think not. ... It is not demonstrable that killing fetuses is killing persons. Not even evangelicals act as if it were. If so, a woman seeking an abortion would be the most culpable person. She is killing her own child. But the evangelical community does not call for her execution."

* "About 10% of evangelicals, according to polls, allow for abortion in the case of rape or incest. But the circumstances of conception should not change the nature of the thing conceived. If it is a human person, killing it is punishing it for something it had nothing to do with. We do not kill people because they had a criminal parent."

* "Nor did the Catholic Church treat abortion as murder in the past. If it had, late-term abortions and miscarriages would have called for treatment of the well-formed fetus as a person, which would require baptism and a Christian burial. That was never the practice."

* "The subject of abortion is not scriptural. ... Abortion is not treated in the Ten Commandments -- or anywhere in Jewish Scripture. It is not treated in the Sermon on the Mount -- or anywhere in the New Testament. It is not treated in the early creeds. It is not treated in the early ecumenical councils."

* "Much of the debate over abortion is based on a misconception -- that it is a religious issue, that the pro-life advocates are acting out of religious conviction. It is not a theological matter at all. There is no theological basis for defending or condemning abortion. Even popes have said that the question of abortion is a matter of natural law, to be decided by natural reason. Well, the pope is not the arbiter of natural law. Natural reason is."

* "Opponents of abortion will say that they are defending only human life. It is certainly true that the fetus is human life. But so is the semen before it fertilizes; so is the ovum before it is fertilized. They are both human products, and both are living things. But not even evangelicals say that the destruction of one or the other would be murder.

Defenders of the fetus say that life begins only after the semen fertilizes the egg, producing an embryo. But, in fact, two-thirds of the embryos produced this way fail to live on because they do not embed in the womb wall. Nature is like fertilization clinics -- it produces more embryos than are actually used. Are all the millions of embryos that fail to be embedded human persons?"

* "The question is not whether the fetus is human life but whether it is a human person, and when it becomes one. Is it when it is capable of thought, of speech, of recognizing itself as a person, or of assuming the responsibilities of a person? Is it when it has a functioning brain? Aquinas said that the fetus did not become a person until God infused the intellectual soul. A functioning brain is not present in the fetus until the end of the sixth month at the earliest.

Not surprisingly, that is the earliest point of viability, the time when a fetus can successfully survive outside the womb.

Whether through serendipity or through some sort of causal connection, it now seems that the onset of a functioning central nervous system with a functioning cerebral cortex and the onset of viability occur around the same time -- the end of the second trimester, a time by which 99% of all abortions have already occurred."

* "The fetus has a face long before it has a brain. It has animation before it has a command center to be aware of its movements or to experience any reaction as pain."

* "Given these uncertainties, who is to make the individual decision to have an abortion? Religious leaders? They have no special authority in the matter, which is not subject to theological norms or guidance. The state? Its authority is given by the people it represents, and the people are divided on this. Doctors? They too differ. The woman is the one closest to the decision. Under Roe vs. Wade, no woman is forced to have an abortion. But those who have decided to have one are able to."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-07-2007, 07:16 PM
 
1,932 posts, read 4,792,815 times
Reputation: 1247
Thumbs down I respectfully disagree

Yes, there are biblical grounds for opposing abortion.

The unborn baby is a human being (Gen. 25:21-22; Job 10:8-12; Isaiah 44:2; Psalm 139:13-16; Hosea 12:3; Jeremiah 1:5; Matthew 1:18-20). The Hebrew (OT) and Greek (NT) words for 'baby' are used the same whether they refer to an unborn baby or an already born child. Jesus was Jesus from the time He was in his mother's womb. Jesus, while in his mother's womb, met John the Baptist, in his mother's womb. The unborn John the Baptist recognized the unborn Jesus and 'lept' inside his mother. (Luke 1:41-44)

Throughout the bible, murder - the killing of innocent humans - is considered sin (Exodus 20:13; Matthew 19:18; Romans 13:9). Therefore, since abortion is killing an innocent human, it is equal to murder and is therefore condemned by God, as shown throughout His word.

Also, abortion due to rape or incest is no excuse. Please consider Ezekiel 18:20, which prohibits executing a child for the crime of his/her father— this means that even the tragic cases of pregnancies due to incest or rape are no justification for killing the innocent child conceived.

This is also an interesting article regarding abortion:
Exodus 21:22-25 - Translations & Mistranslations (http://www.errantskeptics.org/Exodus2122.htm - broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2007, 08:11 PM
 
6,304 posts, read 9,012,915 times
Reputation: 8149
Wow...that's an essay that certainly is a springboard to a LOT of discussion.

As someone who is moderately familiar with the Tanakh, I wonder where it specifically opposes abortion. Can someone please point me to a passage or two?

"Executing the child for the crime of the father"? Personally, I take that to mean literally THAT. I don't see, even in the original Hebrew, anything that even remotely would suggest that "even in the tragic cases...". It says no such thing, as far as I can see.

But, that's what makes religion and the study of the Bible so delicious. There are always people who are SURE that their interpretation is correct.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top