Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You get the last word and leave. LOL
Incidentally, isn't there a rule about no "I'm leaving" declaration posts?
I may be wrong, I was once before(joking) but seriously I think the rule is on "I'm leaving" threads...like an entire thread titled "Why I am
quitting CD" or something like that. I have never heard of a rule against "That's all folks!"http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/aa19/forjerz/porky-1.gif (broken link)in a particular thread.
ARGH!!! I keep wanting to rep you, but I have to spread it around. Funny thing is, I thought I was spreading it around lately. Anyway, kudos! I'll rep you when I can.
Hey, I can help you out if you have any spare reps that you don't know what to do with, thereby freeing you up to rep Alpha!
I have never heard of a rule against "That's all folks!"in a particular thread.
Forum Rules. Scroll down to "No "I'm leaving" messages."
Quote:
I mean, aren't we rolling dice on whether there is a train or there isn't?
Well if you're gonna go Pascal's wager, then the train analogy doesn't work because there are multiple religions. If you should believe because it's the safest bet, then the safest bet ultimately is to go with the religion whose fate for nonbelievers is the worst.
I'm going to have to say on behalf of all nonbelievers, please adopt Rob's position on this. Just leave us be and save the warnings.
Forum Rules. Scroll down to "No "I'm leaving" messages."
You're right. But I must say I've never seen it enforced in that way. I have seen "I'm leaving" threads shut down and deleted, but I've seen many posts that say "I'm outta here" meaning the thread itself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhillyChief
Well if you're gonna go Pascal's wager, then the train analogy doesn't work because there are multiple religions. If you should believe because it's the safest bet, then the safest bet ultimately is to go with the religion whose fate for nonbelievers is the worst.
I'm going to have to say on behalf of all nonbelievers, please adopt Rob's position on this. Just leave us be and save the warnings.
I've never witnessed to the same person twice without:
1-They've brought up the subject, or
2-They've been around when I was talking about it with someone else.
Change that last 'us' to the word 'me' and you've got a deal. I think witnessing to someone who says "Don't witness to me" is wrong, rude, a waste of time and also quite unbiblical.
Location: Somewhere along the path to where I'd like to be.
2,180 posts, read 5,423,977 times
Reputation: 829
FWIW, I never said I was leaving the thread. I simply stated that I was not going to keep going back and forth with BigThirsty in some attempt to get the last word in....meaning, I wasn't going to keep arguing with him. Perhaps some people need to stop presuming so much.
FWIW, I never said I was leaving the thread. I simply stated that I was not going to keep going back and forth with BigThirsty in some attempt to get the last word in....meaning, I wasn't going to keep arguing with him. Perhaps some people need to stop presuming so much.
We were arguing?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.