Quote:
Originally Posted by Squirl
Oh, and I just went by the property b/c I won the multi-offer bid. ![OK](https://pics3.city-data.com/forum/images/smilies/oglvvd.gif) Now let's see how it fares thru inspection.
|
Good for you & best luck in the inspection.
---------------------
We walked away from my husband's first choice house because the agent told us there is already an offer in and to go in with our best & last. I told my husband "not a chance" (with the offer) and especially I hate games, especially games that the ball is already in someone else's court. Why should I be forced to offer what my best is?
So the story went on for the "offer" my first choice house.
It is the second choice to my husband because it is a more expensive house (price and tax).
It is the first choice to me because we are getting a hell of a deal with per sq ft price and also the value of what we are getting: two more extra bedrooms, bigger sq footage and acreage, more private & better location etc....
basically investment wise = better return for that money.
Well, we close on that better house for a great low price
below what would be our best & last price for that first house.
![Big Grin](https://pics3.city-data.com/forum/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
The first house still sit on the for sale list while ours has gone into the sold.
We found out that we actually had lucked out when closing & offering on DH's second choice home & not that first one that already had been bid-ed on
after more research after the close.
We actually closed on our house for a "REO/foreclosure" price but the property is not in the REO/foreclosure list nor in its state... so a very lucky situation for us indeed.
- For the first house if we were to close, we would be immediately under-water, especially if the home price is our best & last...
vs. this second choice, we would be above-water with a nice equity in for years to come.
Facts of the appraisal... even facts of just by looking at the two house, it's attributes and such.
- For the first house would have been a very "hard to sell" since the location of it is in a blind corner (a widower's maker as I call it, especially if I were to back out the drive), lacks the location, lacks the value per sq ft, lacks the yard. Basically it is a "stage" to look very nice kind of a house and even had a professionally landscaped yard (DH loves that landscape stuff) which is easily the best landscape around the neighbor hood,
BUT....
vs. the second house, where the landscape do need some work (still landscaped but just needs tending), is in a great location (I always stress location because that is what sells usually) & the acreage (land itself; the value), is a wayyy bigger house, value for the price per sq ft (investor price), is a
better built house, is really a diamond in the rough (house is what I called the most "plain looking" among other homes in this location)...
really more "sell-able" than the first house if sold at the same asking price.
-
investment opportunity (if we rent out the property)... we will get less for the first house while we will be getting alot more more the second.
The second house is almost double what the first one is, comparing the height and the market (2007 data).
And... with more land to grow.
P.S. If asked, would we have sold the first house & the second house in it's "asking" price? The first house we would, but even for that "asking" price for the second house, we wouldn't. It would be wayyyy more.![OK](https://pics3.city-data.com/forum/images/smilies/oglvvd.gif)