Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-15-2010, 02:46 PM
 
20 posts, read 43,038 times
Reputation: 14

Advertisements

we are working with an agent from an exclusive buyer brokerage, specifically to avoid being unrepresented. i am certain he is not a subagent. the listing agent was apparently not aware of this. if she is in fact doing something illegal, our attorney would have said so. it's just a shame that there seems to be a question of ethics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-15-2010, 03:13 PM
 
Location: NJ
17,573 posts, read 46,223,217 times
Reputation: 16281
Quote:
Originally Posted by emb23 View Post
we are working with an agent from an exclusive buyer brokerage, specifically to avoid being unrepresented. i am certain he is not a subagent. the listing agent was apparently not aware of this. if she is in fact doing something illegal, our attorney would have said so. it's just a shame that there seems to be a question of ethics.
So what did your agent say when she found out the other agent was contacting you directly?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2010, 04:32 PM
 
Location: Austin
7,244 posts, read 21,859,200 times
Reputation: 10015
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silverfall View Post
In Oregon it is illegal. We can't talk to a client being represented by another agent without the permission of the agent. There is clearly some agency confusion by the listing agent or the OP.
What you just said is in the NAR COE, I believe it's article 16, not a "law". If the agents were not REALTORS®, there is no law stopping them from contacting the other party. But from what the OP is saying, he's not a client, he's a customer, and if both agents represent the seller and neither represent him, the listing agent can contact him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2010, 04:43 PM
 
Location: Tempe, Arizona
4,511 posts, read 13,605,176 times
Reputation: 2201
Quote:
Originally Posted by FalconheadWest View Post
...But from what the OP is saying, he's not a client, he's a customer, and if both agents represent the seller and neither represent him, the listing agent can contact him.
I think the OP has clarified that their agent only represents them. Their agent is an exclusive buyer's agent. It was the listing agent that was confused and called them a customer. The listing agent does not seem all that up to speed if she thinks an FHA loan is risky.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2010, 05:23 PM
 
Location: Austin
7,244 posts, read 21,859,200 times
Reputation: 10015
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjrcm View Post
I think the OP has clarified that their agent only represents them. Their agent is an exclusive buyer's agent. It was the listing agent that was confused and called them a customer. The listing agent does not seem all that up to speed if she thinks an FHA loan is risky.
When I responded, there was no page 3, so that confuses me since the time-stamps are far enough apart that page 3 should have been on my screen... hence, I did not see his clarifying response... but it is still odd for the listing agent to have said that they both represent the seller.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-15-2010, 07:11 PM
 
Location: Salem, OR
15,603 posts, read 40,539,112 times
Reputation: 17540
Quote:
Originally Posted by FalconheadWest View Post
What you just said is in the NAR COE, I believe it's article 16, not a "law". If the agents were not REALTORS®, there is no law stopping them from contacting the other party. But from what the OP is saying, he's not a client, he's a customer, and if both agents represent the seller and neither represent him, the listing agent can contact him.

Let me clarify...the ORS (Oregon Revisted Statues) outline undisclosed limited agency. So one of the working rules of the Oregon real estate agency is that we can't have contact with someones client unless the contact is initiated by the other client (how people can start to interview for a new agent if they aren't happy with their old one, open house contact and such) or the agent expresses gives permission such as setting up a showing appointment. This is to avoid, say having the listing agent start to advise the buyer about what to do, thus creating an undisclosed limited agency situation.

My MLS is a non-REALTOR MLS so the NAR COE doesn't apply to us unless agents choose to join.

The OP is a client, just not a client of the listing agent as they assumed. I'm totally unclear how the listing agent thought the buyer agent was in fact a sub-agent. Clearly the buyer agent was not clear enough with the listing agent of their role.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top