Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Real Estate Professionals
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-28-2018, 06:51 PM
 
Location: Rochester, WA
14,458 posts, read 12,086,413 times
Reputation: 38970

Advertisements

FWIW, on the issue of earnest money... If I were advising you on thinking about earnest money, I would caution you not to ever expect to get to keep it if the deal falls apart. Unless you are in an area that is so hot buyers are dropping the typical contingencies, such as inspection and financing at the very least, most offers will come with enough opportunity for buyer to change their mind and get their earnest money back, that you will not likely get to keep earnest money ~anyway~. It is unusual for earnest money to not be returned to the buyer. Our financing contingency runs until close.

At least ~in our area~ ~with our contracts, competently written by a good buyer's agent~

My two cents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-28-2018, 07:28 PM
 
Location: Cary, NC
43,268 posts, read 77,063,738 times
Reputation: 45612
We are starting to see EMD as a second thought.
DD Fees are so high they serve the purpose to some extent, and everyone knows that EMD can be clawed back easily enough.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2018, 07:32 PM
 
Location: Rochester, WA
14,458 posts, read 12,086,413 times
Reputation: 38970
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeJaquish View Post
We are starting to see EMD as a second thought.
DD Fees are so high they serve the purpose to some extent, and everyone knows that EMD can be clawed back easily enough.
We don't have a separate Due Diligence (?) Fee. ~in our area~

Still Earnest money is a token amount and an afterthought... in the vast majority of cases.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2018, 07:00 AM
 
7,269 posts, read 4,210,249 times
Reputation: 5466
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoBromhal View Post
if it said that ALL the earnest money went to the Brokerage, you might have the beginning of a point.
Anyone who is not a broker gets the point. Contracts presented to consumers to sign are written overwhelmingly in favor of brokers and supplied to unsuspecting buyers/sellers. There could just as easily be blanks to fill-in for this item or it all could go to the seller.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2018, 07:05 AM
 
Location: Cary, NC
43,268 posts, read 77,063,738 times
Reputation: 45612
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diana Holbrook View Post
We don't have a separate Due Diligence (?) Fee. ~in our area~

Still Earnest money is a token amount and an afterthought... in the vast majority of cases.
Here you have to buy a contract before you buy the house.
Non-refundable DD Fees, and in hot areas, can be several thousand dollars.
They are credited at closing, but if the buyer gets remorse or inspection issues cannot be resolved with the seller and buyer terminates, that DD Fee is gone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2018, 07:52 AM
 
175 posts, read 169,996 times
Reputation: 412
I'm also not from NC, and language to that effect is not part of our listing contract. You did say that it is split between the "firm and the seller", and then claim that it's going to the listing agent. Do you know for fact that any or all of it is distributed to the listing agent? I don't know how much $$ we're talking here, so just curious.

2nd point is that I agree, it does seem odd. I've never liked to hear anything to the effect of 'yes it's in there, but it's never enforced' with regard to contracts. If it were me and I took issue with something in a contract I would want the language clarified or altered so that I could agree with what I was signing. Not sure I would take issue, in this case, because again, I don't know the dollar value or the details.

Just my 2 cents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2018, 09:55 AM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
10,966 posts, read 21,974,961 times
Reputation: 10659
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeJaquish View Post
Section 11. Earnest Money.
NCAR Standard Form 2-T.

Yes. It is in there.
I have never seen it enforced as written, and suspect that is because many agents feel as you do.
But, bear in mind, this paragraph provides the listing agent with no claim on the Due Diligence Fee, which goes entirely and immediately to the Seller.
Additionally, it is quite reasonable to expect that this amount would be deducted from the listing agent's fee when bringing another buyer.
SC has a similar clause and I've never seen the EM go back to anyone except one of the party of the transactions. I suspect not a single broker would step up to argue a change if one were implemented stating the EM would go the buyer or seller.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2018, 10:28 AM
 
Location: DFW
40,952 posts, read 49,162,125 times
Reputation: 55001
Money always goes to the Seller here in TX if it's forfeited. We are not part of the contract, EM deposit is between Buyer and Seller to cover damages to Seller.

I can imagine a Broker wanting a piece of it wanting to cover their expenses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2018, 10:36 AM
 
Location: Just south of Denver since 1989
11,825 posts, read 34,423,134 times
Reputation: 8970
In Colorado, it used to say the earnest money forfeiture was split between Brokerage firm & the Seller up to the commission amount.

Now we choose:
20. FORFEITURE OF PAYMENTS. In the event of a forfeiture of payments made by a buyer, the sums received will be: (1) 100% will be paid to Seller; (2) divided between Brokerage Firm and Seller, one-half to Brokerage Firm but not to exceed the Brokerage Firm compensation agreed upon herein, and the balance to Seller; (3) Other: __________. If no box is checked in this Section, choice (1), 100 % paid to Seller, applies. Any forfeiture of payment under this section will not reduce any Brokerage Firm compensation owed, earned and payable under § 7.

Our forms have been approved by the state. They do not favor brokerages.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2018, 05:26 PM
 
Location: NC
9,358 posts, read 14,090,114 times
Reputation: 20913
Can't help but feel NC is "special" in making every attempt to favor the brokerage. Other items in the contract are so convoluted that it is difficult to understand what they are getting at. It's easy to see why FSBO is so appealing. It's even the seller's fault if the numbers in the closing documents are miscalculated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Real Estate Professionals

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top