Isn't it un Presidential for a POTUS to challenge protestors instead of defending their right to freedom of speech? (polls, soldiers)

[hippydippyman]

Originally Posted by Katiana

Here is what you said:



Comparing Obama to every other president.

Then you quoted Agnew, a moron.

[hippydippyman]

Originally Posted by Katiana

Here's something from the RW hero, Reagan:

President Reagan

"He ridiculed campus radicals, saying one demonstrator "had a haircut like Tarzan, walked like Jane and smelled like Cheetah." "



No, just showing that the statement is untrue. Frankly, I think Bush did the right thing by saying the protesters have the right to free speech.

Did he ridicule them as a whole and say that they should thank him?

[Katarina Witt]

Originally Posted by hippydippyman

Then you quoted Agnew, a moron.

Well, I can't quote the whole article due to copyright concerns. Maybe you should read it. Is there any doubt he was Nixon's henchman?

[hippydippyman]

Originally Posted by Katiana

Well, I can't quote the whole article due to copyright concerns. Maybe you should read it. Is there any doubt he was Nixon's henchman?

Obama's henchman did not stand before a microphone and say that people should thank him. It was Obama himself. Why didn't he let the unpopular Rahm Emanuel or the fool Joe Biden say such a dumb thing? I think Obama is not too bright.

[Wapasha]

Originally Posted by NYer75

That tax break you are enjoying is a lie too?

Are you talking about the $13 a week payroll tax cut?

[pbrauer]

Originally Posted by hippydippyman

My wife is right. Obama is a failure as President because he doesn't even follow Presidential protocol. Mocking protestors is juvenile.

When you grow up, you'll realize this thread you started is juvenile.

[hippydippyman]

Originally Posted by pbrauer

When you grow up, you'll realize this thread you started is juvenile.

When you get your reality check you will realize that attacking people with whom you don't agree is cowardly. An intelligent person would argue the point and not attact the poster.

[pbrauer]

Originally Posted by hippydippyman

When you get your reality check you will realize that attacking people with whom you don't agree is cowardly. An intelligent person would argue the point and not attact the poster.

He didn't attack anyone, but apparently you want to take the word of Bill O'Reilly and Chris Wallace - you can't think for yourself.


YouTube - tax thanks

[sickofnyc]

Originally Posted by hippydippyman

When you get your reality check you will realize that attacking people with whom you don't agree is cowardly. An intelligent person would argue the point and not attact the poster.

"Attacking people" is a bit of an over the top statement in reference to what Obama said. I have to admire his patience and tolerance with all of the lunacy and stupidity surrounding the bashing that has ensued towards him since he became POTUS.

[Katarina Witt]

Originally Posted by hippydippyman

Obama's henchman did not stand before a microphone and say that people should thank him. It was Obama himself. Why didn't he let the unpopular Rahm Emanuel or the fool Joe Biden say such a dumb thing? I think Obama is not too bright.

Vietnam War Protests — History.com Articles, Video, Pictures and Facts

The following year (1969), Nixon claimed in a famous speech that anti-war protesters constituted a small--albeit vocal--minority that should not be allowed to drown out the “silent majority” of Americans.