Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-21-2010, 10:58 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 45,201,827 times
Reputation: 7118

Advertisements

Pundits Agree: Timing of SEC Suit is*Political - Real Clear Politics – TIME.com

No one is fooled....except the obama sycophants.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-21-2010, 11:16 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 30,111,167 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Well I read your link, and frankly, don't think so.

Some of the pundits question the timing, but currently there is no evidence that the timing of the lawsuit is the result of collusion between the White House and the SEC. Schapiro so far has been demonstrating considerably more aggression in pursuit of these cases.

Some of the pundits don't question the timing at all, but instead point out the weaknesses in the case. And they are quite right.

One of the pundits is remarking on the SEC board not unanimously voting to pursue this case. But that's not remarkable. While Schapiro's predecessor was noted for trying to achieve unanimous decisions, the board has an odd number for precisely the reason that originally it was never intended to be unanimous in its decisions, that a majority would carry the vote. And, in fact, historically, non-unanimous decisions outnumber unanimous decisions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2010, 06:12 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,975,747 times
Reputation: 4585
Now looking into the rating companies. No, WS doesn't need no reform!

News Headlines (http://www.cnbc.com/id/36731980 - broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2010, 09:39 AM
 
Location: State of Superior
8,733 posts, read 16,031,943 times
Reputation: 2871
Regardless what happens , the real trial is in the court of public opinion. These " banks" have gained a reputation far beyond what is legal, or can be successfully prosecuted.... The principals should go directly to jail....as far as the pitchfork crowd is concerned.
Take a look at how Canada handles what THEIR FINCINAL COMPANIES CAN GET AWAYWITH... We had laws put into place in 1935 to balance the risks and limit the exposure. Gradually over time , it all went away, mostly when Regan came to power...all in the name of deregulation. !980 was a turning point with this trend. Some has been good , some bad. Open entry I believe is a good thing, but playing fast and loose with the economy is not. The Big Guys need to be broken up, way too big, or , it will happen all over again. Forget what you think about bailouts, any institution that large WILL be bailed out if it happens again. Credit cards are controlled by four Banks....that's another story with usury worse than the Mob. The bottom line.....downsize the big guys...its time has come.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2010, 10:05 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
38,841 posts, read 22,704,925 times
Reputation: 14268
Quote:
Originally Posted by darstar View Post
Regardless what happens , the real trial is in the court of public opinion. These " banks" have gained a reputation far beyond what is legal, or can be successfully prosecuted.... The principals should go directly to jail....as far as the pitchfork crowd is concerned.
Take a look at how Canada handles what THEIR FINCINAL COMPANIES CAN GET AWAYWITH... We had laws put into place in 1935 to balance the risks and limit the exposure. Gradually over time , it all went away, mostly when Regan came to power...all in the name of deregulation. !980 was a turning point with this trend. Some has been good , some bad. Open entry I believe is a good thing, but playing fast and loose with the economy is not. The Big Guys need to be broken up, way too big, or , it will happen all over again. Forget what you think about bailouts, any institution that large WILL be bailed out if it happens again. Credit cards are controlled by four Banks....that's another story with usury worse than the Mob. The bottom line.....downsize the big guys...its time has come.
During the Clinton administration we had Reno threatening banks, and we had the 0bama lead ACORN disrupting banks by protesting them if they did not increase lending to low income and minority home buyer.

Banks were being heavily pressured to give out risky loans, and the managers at both F&F were getting larger and larger bonuses for buying up every piece of mortgage paper they could get their hands on, and they felt safe in doing so because the federal government had their backs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top