Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Would You Support A Balanced Budget Amendment
I Would Support WITH A Super Majority Emergency Opt Out 6 27.27%
I Would Support WITHOUT A Super Majority Emergency Opt Out 2 9.09%
I Support With or Without An Emergency Opt Out 9 40.91%
I Do Not Support Such An Amendment Either Way 5 22.73%
Voters: 22. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-10-2010, 10:49 AM
 
Location: Jonquil City (aka Smyrna) Georgia- by Atlanta
16,259 posts, read 24,756,161 times
Reputation: 3587

Advertisements

This was brought up in the early 1980s when Reagan was running up deficits and I am wondering if it is not time to take another look at the idea of putting a Balanced Budget Amendment on the Federal Constitution. My own view is that I would support the idea so long as the amendment had a provision for an emergency opt out that would require the President declare a National Emergency and that 4/5ths of the Congress and the Senate declare the emergency and that it be repaid within 5 years of the end of the emergency. If the emergency lasted longer than a year (such as a major war or disease outbreak), the President, Congress and Senate would be required to renew the declaration with the same 4/5ths vote.
It is my belief that, if these politicians know they either have to RAISE taxes or CUT other programs to fund all this pork, they will think twice. They are not going to say "I am voting to cut Social Security to pay for a bridge to nowhere". What do you think?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-10-2010, 11:07 AM
 
2,229 posts, read 1,686,064 times
Reputation: 623
I think that is an excellent idea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2010, 11:09 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,090,553 times
Reputation: 9383
Is It Time For A BALANCED BUDGET AMENDMENT?

Oh my god yes... along with a line item veto that will pass the constitutional requirements..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2010, 11:35 AM
 
Location: SARASOTA, FLORIDA
11,486 posts, read 15,303,260 times
Reputation: 4894
Actually I believe that Jim Demint(R) is working on doing this soon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2010, 11:46 AM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,827,890 times
Reputation: 18304
That is teh only way your going to get rid of teh shell games fo supposed off sets that bever happen like the recent scoring by CBO in the heathcare bills.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2010, 11:57 AM
 
Location: Jonquil City (aka Smyrna) Georgia- by Atlanta
16,259 posts, read 24,756,161 times
Reputation: 3587
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunny-Days90 View Post
Actually I believe that Jim Demint(R) is working on doing this soon.
Please tell me that me and Jim DeMitt don't agree on something!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2010, 12:12 PM
 
Location: Fort Worth Texas
12,481 posts, read 10,220,095 times
Reputation: 2536
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevK View Post
This was brought up in the early 1980s when Reagan was running up deficits and I am wondering if it is not time to take another look at the idea of putting a Balanced Budget Amendment on the Federal Constitution. My own view is that I would support the idea so long as the amendment had a provision for an emergency opt out that would require the President declare a National Emergency and that 4/5ths of the Congress and the Senate declare the emergency and that it be repaid within 5 years of the end of the emergency. If the emergency lasted longer than a year (such as a major war or disease outbreak), the President, Congress and Senate would be required to renew the declaration with the same 4/5ths vote.
It is my belief that, if these politicians know they either have to RAISE taxes or CUT other programs to fund all this pork, they will think twice. They are not going to say "I am voting to cut Social Security to pay for a bridge to nowhere". What do you think?
time for a constitutional convention so the people can amend the constitution. We have to stop the spending
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2010, 12:08 PM
 
Location: New York (liberal cesspool)
918 posts, read 816,742 times
Reputation: 222
Default You guys are behind the times of reality

I received this only this past week:

Saturday, February 6, 2010
Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC) introduced two major budget reforms today: S.2990, a one-year moratorium on earmarks and, S.J.Res. 27, a Balanced Budget Constitutional Amendment that includes a two-thirds majority requirement for raising taxes. DeMint is calling on his Republicans colleagues to lead by example and cosponsor both of these important measures.

Here are the Republican Senators (and Republican Senate candidates) who are supporting both reforms along with a list of Republican Senators who are not.

Candidates Who Support
Kelly Ayotte (NH-SEN)
Ovide Lamontagne (NH-SEN)
Mike Lee (UT-SEN)
Danny Tarkanian (NV-SEN)
Rand Paul (KY-SEN)
Curtis Coleman (AR-SEN)
Tim Bridgewater (UT-SEN)
Jane Norton (CO-SEN)
Ken Buck (CO-SEN)
Marlin Stutzman (IN-SEN)


Republican Cosponsors
Richard Burr (NC)
Saxby Chambliss (GA)
Mike Crapo (ID)
Tom Coburn (OK)
John Cornyn (TX)
Jim DeMint (SC)
John Ensign (NV)
Lindsey Graham (SC)
Johnny Isakson (GA)
Jon Kyl (AZ)
John McCain (AZ)
George LeMieux (FL)
James Risch (ID)

Republicans Who Have NOT Cosponsored
Lamar Alexander (TN) -- (202) 224-4944 -- Email
John Barrasso (WY) -- (202) 224-6441 -- Email
Bob Bennett (UT) -- (202) 224-5444 -- Email
Kit Bond (MO) -- (202) 224-5721 -- Email
Scott Brown (MA) -- (202) 224-4543 -- Website
Sam Brownback (KS) -- (202) 224-6521 -- Email
Jim Bunning (KY) -- (202) 224-4343 -- Email
Thad Cochran (MS) -- (202) 224-5054 -- Email
Susan Collins (ME) -- (202) 224-2523 -- Email
Bob Corker (TN) -- (202) 224-3344 -- Email
Mike Enzi (WY) -- (202) 224-3424 -- Email
Chuck Grassley (IA) -- (202) 224-3744 -- Email
Judd Gregg (NH) -- (202) 224-3324 -- Email
Orrin Hatch (UT) -- (202) 224-5251 -- Email
Kay Bailey Hutchison (TX) -- (202) 224-5922 -- Email
James Inhofe (OK) -- (202) 224-4721 -- Email
Mike Johanns (NE) -- (202) 224-4224 -- Email
Richard Lugar (IN) -- (202) 224-4814 -- Email
Mitch McConnell (KY) -- (202) 224-2541 -- Email
Lisa Murkowski (AK) -- (202) 224-6665 -- Email
Pat Roberts (KS) -- (202) 224-4774 -- Email
Jeff Sessions (AL) -- (202) 224-4124 -- Email
Richard Shelby (AL) -- (202) 224-5744 -- Email
Olympia Snowe (ME) -- (202) 224-5344 -- Email
John Thune (SD) -- (202) 224-2321 -- Email
David Vitter (LA) -- (202) 224-4623 -- Email
George Voinovich (OH) -- (202) 224-3353 -- Email
Roger Wicker (MA) -- (202) 224-6253 -- Email

No Democrat has cosponsored both of these measures.

Click here for complete list of Senators and their contact information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
WORKS FOR ME! Now let's see if some of the disenchanted demonRATs who can't stomach Oba-Care can put their vote where their mouths are, because passage of this stops the Oba-meister in his neo-Marxist tracks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2010, 12:31 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,475,534 times
Reputation: 9618
balanced budget NOW

and

no ear mark or line item veto...now
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2010, 12:33 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,090,553 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by doctorhugo View Post
Here are the Republican Senators (and Republican Senate candidates) who are supporting both reforms along with a list of Republican Senators who are not.
Thanks, I called mine who has "not issued a statement at this time" and I encouraged him to do so..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top