Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-01-2010, 01:02 PM
 
20,484 posts, read 12,411,061 times
Reputation: 10291

Advertisements

From the "Weather is not Climate files"

Obama’s evidence for Global Warming is melting.


In the State of the Union Address, Obama made the following statement:

“I know that there are those who disagree with the overwhelming scientific evidence on climate change.”

However, the very evidence he stands on seems to be melting as report after report from Europe punches hole after hole in the IPCC’s report on the subject.

Least we forget this report from this group is THE report that drives all Climate change discussion. Trillions of dollars and Government policy depend on it.

First we find that the report stated:
Himalayan glaciers could disappear by 2035

It turns out that is a baseless claim.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/7062667/Pachauri-the-real-story-behind-the-Glaciergate-scandal.html

Second, the IPCC report suggests Ice disappearing from mountain tops.

Evidently IPCC has changed course from Peer reviewed papers written by respected scientists to using regular magazine articles quoting folks who like to hike in the mountains. That is a far cry from the “its science” the AGW crowd likes to roll with isn’t it?

http://www.heliogenic.net/2010/01/31/the-ipcc-must-be-disbanded-latest-fraud-mountain-ice/

Third, the IPCC reported that the Amazon Rain Forrest is disappearing right now because of climate change. However it seems once again the IPCC is using strange stuff to replace hard science to come up with the report. It seems the IPCC has taken to printing reports from the World Wildlife Fund as scientific evidence! Not peer reviewed papers just stuff written by the OMG WE ARE KILLING FURRY LITTLE ANIMALS crowd.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/7113582/Amazongate-new-evidence-of-the-IPCCs-failures.html


The evidence is melting like a wicked witch being doused with water. Mr. Obama’ faith not withstanding, someone from the “weather is not climate” team needs to explain how they can believe in Anthropogenic Global Warming when the evidence is melting faster than the snow on Kilimanjaro!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-01-2010, 01:10 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,312,578 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
From the "Weather is not Climate files"

Obama’s evidence for Global Warming is melting.


In the State of the Union Address, Obama made the following statement:

“I know that there are those who disagree with the overwhelming scientific evidence on climate change.”

However, the very evidence he stands on seems to be melting as report after report from Europe punches hole after hole in the IPCC’s report on the subject.

Least we forget this report from this group is THE report that drives all Climate change discussion. Trillions of dollars and Government policy depend on it.

First we find that the report stated:
Himalayan glaciers could disappear by 2035

It turns out that is a baseless claim.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/7062667/Pachauri-the-real-story-behind-the-Glaciergate-scandal.html

Second, the IPCC report suggests Ice disappearing from mountain tops.

Evidently IPCC has changed course from Peer reviewed papers written by respected scientists to using regular magazine articles quoting folks who like to hike in the mountains. That is a far cry from the “its science” the AGW crowd likes to roll with isn’t it?

http://www.heliogenic.net/2010/01/31/the-ipcc-must-be-disbanded-latest-fraud-mountain-ice/

Third, the IPCC reported that the Amazon Rain Forrest is disappearing right now because of climate change. However it seems once again the IPCC is using strange stuff to replace hard science to come up with the report. It seems the IPCC has taken to printing reports from the World Wildlife Fund as scientific evidence! Not peer reviewed papers just stuff written by the OMG WE ARE KILLING FURRY LITTLE ANIMALS crowd.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/7113582/Amazongate-new-evidence-of-the-IPCCs-failures.html


The evidence is melting like a wicked witch being doused with water. Mr. Obama’ faith not withstanding, someone from the “weather is not climate” team needs to explain how they can believe in Anthropogenic Global Warming when the evidence is melting faster than the snow on Kilimanjaro!
I think those supposedly stolen e-mails opened a gate to something that the IPCC and UN just can't close without using this method of talking. Yep, they are losing their butts but don't seem to be ready to give in.

Of course, Obama is wanting Cap and Trade so he can further weaken the US economy for his own personal reasons.

Great post, Ferd.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2010, 01:11 PM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,340,608 times
Reputation: 2337
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
From the "Weather is not Climate files"

Obama’s evidence for Global Warming is melting.


In the State of the Union Address, Obama made the following statement:

“I know that there are those who disagree with the overwhelming scientific evidence on climate change.”

However, the very evidence he stands on seems to be melting as report after report from Europe punches hole after hole in the IPCC’s report on the subject.

Least we forget this report from this group is THE report that drives all Climate change discussion. Trillions of dollars and Government policy depend on it.

First we find that the report stated:
Himalayan glaciers could disappear by 2035

It turns out that is a baseless claim.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/7062667/Pachauri-the-real-story-behind-the-Glaciergate-scandal.html

Second, the IPCC report suggests Ice disappearing from mountain tops.

Evidently IPCC has changed course from Peer reviewed papers written by respected scientists to using regular magazine articles quoting folks who like to hike in the mountains. That is a far cry from the “its science” the AGW crowd likes to roll with isn’t it?

http://www.heliogenic.net/2010/01/31/the-ipcc-must-be-disbanded-latest-fraud-mountain-ice/

Third, the IPCC reported that the Amazon Rain Forrest is disappearing right now because of climate change. However it seems once again the IPCC is using strange stuff to replace hard science to come up with the report. It seems the IPCC has taken to printing reports from the World Wildlife Fund as scientific evidence! Not peer reviewed papers just stuff written by the OMG WE ARE KILLING FURRY LITTLE ANIMALS crowd.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/7113582/Amazongate-new-evidence-of-the-IPCCs-failures.html


The evidence is melting like a wicked witch being doused with water. Mr. Obama’ faith not withstanding, someone from the “weather is not climate” team needs to explain how they can believe in Anthropogenic Global Warming when the evidence is melting faster than the snow on Kilimanjaro!
Well, no one can debate this.

Thanks for writing a threadstopper!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2010, 01:19 PM
 
20,484 posts, read 12,411,061 times
Reputation: 10291
Quote:
Originally Posted by ergohead View Post
Well, no one can debate this.

Thanks for writing a threadstopper!
LOL! yea I suppose this one will sink fast. I doubt there are any AGW types around here even willing to broach the subject.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2010, 01:22 PM
 
Location: Chicago Suburbs
3,199 posts, read 4,321,795 times
Reputation: 1176
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
LOL! yea I suppose this one will sink fast. I doubt there are any AGW types around here even willing to broach the subject.
Don't be so sure
I have read some whacky justifcations from the foil hatters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2010, 01:23 PM
 
20,484 posts, read 12,411,061 times
Reputation: 10291
Quote:
Originally Posted by allydriver View Post
Don't be so sure
I have read some whacky justifcations from the foil hatters.
Well lets taunt them until they show up and share the insanity!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2010, 01:24 PM
 
Location: OB
2,404 posts, read 3,952,174 times
Reputation: 879
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
Of course, Obama is wanting Cap and Trade so he can further weaken the US economy for his own personal reasons.
Not to side track things, but I read that Obama's new budget has something around $800B in projected tax revenue from Cap & Trade.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2010, 01:29 PM
 
20,484 posts, read 12,411,061 times
Reputation: 10291
Quote:
Originally Posted by mossomo View Post
Not to side track things, but I read that Obama's new budget has something around $800B in projected tax revenue from Cap & Trade.
oh boy. so what you are saying is the 3.8 trillion dollar budget with over 8% deficit spending is nearly a trillion off based on the hopes that dems in congress can raise a trillion in new taxation.... during a recession.


great googly moogly
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2010, 02:12 PM
 
20,484 posts, read 12,411,061 times
Reputation: 10291
If you post "it’s cold here"

Libs come out in droves to protest and lament the ignorance of those who oppose the notion that climate change is a man made deal.

If you post something factual that clearly pokes holes in their pet theories, they act like the thread never existed.

This thread was as much an experiment to prove the above as it was a shot at the AGW crowd.

So what we really know is, GW Skeptics don’t post “Its cold here “ threads because we don’t know what climate it.

We post them because it is the only way to engage the other side.

When we post threads about the science or we post threads about the evidence concerning the science, they run and hide.

THERE IS NO ANTHROPOGENIC IN GLOBAL WARMING!

There. I feel better!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2010, 02:23 PM
 
20,484 posts, read 12,411,061 times
Reputation: 10291
...More melting....

not to be outdone by Phile Jones and the CRU, New Zealand's top climate agency NIWA has lost its records....They dont know how they adjusted their temp. record...

TBR.cc: BREAKING NEWS: NIWA reveals NZ original climate data missing
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top