Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Interestigly while I was digging around I found that the Tea Party used hundreds of thousands of dollars to advertise him. What? Tea Party is pushing for the most liberal Republican into senate? That is very strange since they have sworn to get people like him OUT of Congress.
Not really, going from Teddy Kennedy to Scott Brown is a big step up. Teddy Kennedy to Martha Coakley not so much. The Tea Partiers got a real upgrade here. Congrats to them!
Give it up Friend, we both know no matter what you provide in the way ot truth, "Whatever" will just poopoo it and say it ain't so, while of-course showing their skill at childish insults. It is the way of the farsiders these days, ingore your facts, srceam at ya and then claim victory, pathetic at best but so very typical. We both know that through long experience, it is best to just move on to an adult discussion when all discussion is lost.
Have Fun
Casper
....if,...and when 'ol Finn gets aroung to posting facts, instead of opinion.
Many of our radical limbaugh-republicans simply cannot make one post without some kind of insult.
It's not an insult it's his middle name. He must like the name because he picked it himself in college. Not enough people asked why he switched his name from Barry to a Muslim name. What motivated him to do it?
Being a free market advocate is not mutually exclusive of being fiscally conservative.
Regarding the MA HC bill, he states this: So, are you saying that attempting to investigate ways to make MA HC fiscally efficient is somehow hypocritical? Just because someone supports a bill for HC, doesn't mean they can't also be concerned that it is cost effective. Again, the two are not mutually exclusive of one another.
Being for free market principles does not mean that you throw the baby out with the bathwater. Obviously, regulations and oversight play a role. What bailouts and stimulus bills did he vote for again?
The point I was trying to make on Mass HC is there is only 2 ways for the state to control cost.They can cut the subsidy that is doled out for individuals to purchases insurance from private HC insurer's.Which would defeat the purpose of having all the residents covered due to the fact that the slash would make it un affordable for some people.
The second is to price control the insurance providers,I can not think of anything else that Mass can do.
I never claimed Brown voted for bail outs,stimulus.or subsidies,but I can give you a full list of {R}s that have.Take the Sen leader McConnell who screeches that the HC bill is socialist and a attack on the free market.But he has voted for the bail out and was on board for farm subsidies,is that not interference in the free market?
Myself,I do not listen to what they say I look at their record.They can claim to be fiscal conservatives and for the free market until their blue in the face but if their record shows otherwise they never get my vote.
What part of vowing to vote against the ObamaReidPelosi HC bill don't you comprehend?
I am talking about the tea party who collects money to get RINOs and Dems out of congress, and then they turn around and spend the money to get a RINO in.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
