Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Bill Clinton = Best fiscal conservative president in the last 40 years?
Yes, Bill Clinton balanced the budget 20 76.92%
No, he got a bj and that cancels everything he did 6 23.08%
Voters: 26. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-06-2010, 09:02 PM
 
18,160 posts, read 25,397,590 times
Reputation: 16881

Advertisements

William J. Clinton | The White House

During the administration of William Jefferson Clinton, the U.S. enjoyed more peace and economic well being than at any time in its history. He was the first Democratic president since Franklin D. Roosevelt to win a second term. He could point to the lowest unemployment rate in modern times, the lowest inflation in 30 years, the highest home ownership in the country's history, dropping crime rates in many places, and reduced welfare rolls. He proposed the first balanced budget in decades and achieved a budget surplus. As part of a plan to celebrate the millennium in 2000, Clinton called for a great national initiative to end racial discrimination.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-06-2010, 09:05 PM
 
12,669 posts, read 20,486,145 times
Reputation: 3050
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dopo View Post
William J. Clinton | The White House

During the administration of William Jefferson Clinton, the U.S. enjoyed more peace and economic well being than at any time in its history. He was the first Democratic president since Franklin D. Roosevelt to win a second term. He could point to the lowest unemployment rate in modern times, the lowest inflation in 30 years, the highest home ownership in the country's history, dropping crime rates in many places, and reduced welfare rolls. He proposed the first balanced budget in decades and achieved a budget surplus. As part of a plan to celebrate the millennium in 2000, Clinton called for a great national initiative to end racial discrimination.
Just so you know at the end of his term we were heading into a recession!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2010, 09:17 PM
 
18,160 posts, read 25,397,590 times
Reputation: 16881
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miborn View Post
... we were heading into a recession!
We were heading... = we were not...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2010, 10:02 PM
 
6,086 posts, read 6,067,265 times
Reputation: 1916
I think Bill Clinton did good job as President, although he does have his critics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2010, 10:13 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 97,066,464 times
Reputation: 18310
You really need to look at the way he did it. much like the way that congress gets around the budget act by estimating savings in bills that never actually come true.It's like a shell game and all administrations play it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2010, 10:23 PM
 
269 posts, read 296,943 times
Reputation: 146
Bill Clinton ran surpluses because of two things:

-He entered the Presidency at the end of a recession and was able to ride up to the dot-com bubble.
-The Republicans in Congress wouldn't let him have all of the social program spending he wanted.

Nothing magical about his economic team in any way. And eventually, the dot-com popped, so even if there was something about his economic and budget team, it certainly wasn't sustainable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2010, 10:34 PM
 
4,432 posts, read 7,003,033 times
Reputation: 2262
Bill Clinton was a neo Liberal and as a result the fate of the unemployed, single mothers and many of the poor in the country actually did get worse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2010, 10:38 PM
 
Location: Highland, CA (formerly Newark, NJ)
6,183 posts, read 6,098,435 times
Reputation: 2150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miborn View Post
Just so you know at the end of his term we were heading into a recession!
That was the early 2000's recession which didn't effect America, just Europe and Asia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2010, 10:46 PM
 
4,432 posts, read 7,003,033 times
Reputation: 2262
The main liberal measure of Clinton’s first year was expansion of the earned income tax credit for low income earners, a policy that was in any case consistent with the neoliberal emphasis on market incentives. The central liberal policy plank to reform the health care system came, of course, to naught. With the Republicans gaining control of Congress with the 1994 Contract with America platform, Clinton’s surrender to the right was complete: health care reform was scrapped; welfare was devolved to the states; and from 1995 on Clinton traded back and forth with Republicans over the favored path of deficit reduction and smaller government. Even the fiscal surpluses of Clinton’s second term did not overturn the neoliberal trajectory established during these years. The 1996 Welfare Reform Bill, for instance, turned over welfare responsibility to the states, as initially proposed in Reagan’s 1982 New Federalism speech. But more importantly it placed two-year time limits for the able-bodied to be on welfare, effectively making employment even more a wholly individual responsibility. The 1997 budget plan for deficit reduction further locked in balanced budgeting against counter-cyclical stabilization policies. The New Deal and Keynesianism were dead in American politics, sent to the policy graveyard by Clinton’s Democrats. “The Clinton Administration,” Meeropol concludes, “has as its legacy an abject surrender to an unelected group of people who represent the financial sector of the economy.”

Neoliberalism from Reagan to Clinton - Monthly Review
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2010, 10:48 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,523 posts, read 33,403,329 times
Reputation: 7643
Quote:
Originally Posted by twista6002 View Post
That was the early 2000's recession which didn't effect America, just Europe and Asia.
It did affect America. There was a recession (in America) from March, 2001 to Nov., 2001.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top