Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-29-2009, 06:52 AM
 
29,920 posts, read 39,643,215 times
Reputation: 4800

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
The real cost of malpractice is not the malpractice insurance, it is the over-ordering of tests/imaging that occurs as a result of that threat to cover yourself. That expense is HUGE. I personally am compelled to over order imaging studies that are medically probably not necessary, but from a legal protection standpoint, probably are. We practice and do what is best for our patients, but the appeal of imaging is that it is non-invasive and low risk with no complications. The only problem is the cost, which is a very large factor in health care expenses. While the direct costs of malpractice are low, the indirect costs are enormous.
Exactly...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-29-2009, 12:34 PM
 
7,550 posts, read 11,462,681 times
Reputation: 3701
As far as malpractice. Any opinions on how Canada deals with this issue? Could this approach work in America?

Canada keeps malpractice cost in check - St. Petersburg Times
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2009, 12:43 PM
 
29,920 posts, read 39,643,215 times
Reputation: 4800
Quote:
Originally Posted by Motion View Post
As far as malpractice. Any opinions on how Canada deals with this issue? Could this approach work in America?

Canada keeps malpractice cost in check - St. Petersburg Times
I saw that too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2009, 01:05 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
7,083 posts, read 12,112,872 times
Reputation: 4125
I work in the industry in finance, and I think the way the government works now with payments from government sponsored programs is the wrong way. If they make a single payer system by expanding those systems hospitals would fold overnight, largely because in pretty much every state government payers pay under cost. Hospitals in our area have costs that average 50% of charges, Medicare pays 43-45% of charges, Medicaid pays 35% of charges (and there are lower reimbursements, some programs as low as 10%)...so all those contracted payers get to pay more for their care to subsidize them in addition to taxes.

Until the government pays actual cost for their participants, cutting costs won't do any good if they won't pay it and I'm not going to support it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2009, 01:09 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
3,086 posts, read 5,388,455 times
Reputation: 1626
Yes, if it includes everyone, it is most definatly cheaper. Look how rich the H.C. companies have gotten through "cherry picking"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top