Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-15-2009, 10:24 PM
 
7,540 posts, read 11,408,938 times
Reputation: 3675

Advertisements

With all this recent talk about right wing extremism I was curious how some of you would compare right wing extremist like Tim McViegh to left wing extemist such as the Weather Undeground? I'am comparing them because both used bombs and were anti the government of their time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-15-2009, 10:33 PM
 
6,762 posts, read 11,652,318 times
Reputation: 3028
I would begin by saying that only one person from the 2 extremist mentioned launched the political career of a president in their living room. That same person is lovingly accepted by much of the left now. McVeigh however was a recluse and complete loner who was completely denounced for his actions by the right wing.

So one of the extremist lived on to be popular among liberals, the other experienced capital punishment and was never liked by conservatives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2009, 11:33 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,146,068 times
Reputation: 15038
"McVeigh however was a recluse and complete loner who was completely denounced for his actions by the right wing."

McVeigh denouced?

John Hawkins: You've caught a lot of heat for a couple of quotes you made. In your column three days after 9/11, you said, "We know who the homicidal maniacs are.They are the ones cheering and dancing right now. We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity." You also said in an interview with the New York Observer, "My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building." Do you stand by those quotes or do you think that perhaps you should have phrased them differently?

Ann Coulter: Ozzy Osbourne has his bats, and I have that darn "convert them to Christianity" quote. (Thank you for giving the full quote. I have the touch, don't I?) Some may not like what I said, but I'm still waiting to hear a better suggestion.

RE: McVeigh quote. Of course I regret it. I should have added, "after everyone had left the building except the editors and reporters."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2009, 07:18 AM
 
8,185 posts, read 12,664,891 times
Reputation: 2893
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
"McVeigh however was a recluse and complete loner who was completely denounced for his actions by the right wing."

McVeigh denouced?

John Hawkins: You've caught a lot of heat for a couple of quotes you made. In your column three days after 9/11, you said, "We know who the homicidal maniacs are.They are the ones cheering and dancing right now. We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity." You also said in an interview with the New York Observer, "My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building." Do you stand by those quotes or do you think that perhaps you should have phrased them differently?

Ann Coulter: Ozzy Osbourne has his bats, and I have that darn "convert them to Christianity" quote. (Thank you for giving the full quote. I have the touch, don't I?) Some may not like what I said, but I'm still waiting to hear a better suggestion.

RE: McVeigh quote. Of course I regret it. I should have added, "after everyone had left the building except the editors and reporters."
Sooo, what how does McVeigh and the Weather Underground differ?
They don't. They both had/have idiots who idolize/whitewash thier actions. That cannot be denied.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2009, 07:23 AM
 
8,185 posts, read 12,664,891 times
Reputation: 2893
Look, they don't differ at all. Well, they do in that McVeigh worked primarily alone. I don't believe he had a following, a cult, an organization.
The Weather Underground did.
They also differ in body count, but that was more indicative of the Weather Undergounds (thankfully) inability to make large explosives.
Their intent was the same. Neither McVeigh nor the members of the Weather Underground had any sympathy for their (potential) victims whatsoever.
And yes, McVeigh had his apologists - though they were few and far between. And crackpots, besides.
The Weather Underground still to this very day has its apologists on the C-D boards .... I recall reading long passionate posts about how 'it was the 60's man, it was all about ending Nam, man' and other bullshiit hippy rhetoric.
Anyone who would excuse bombings for any reason is an extremist and not worth the air they breathe. Luckily sane people agree, regardless of ideology.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2009, 07:27 AM
 
1,048 posts, read 2,393,718 times
Reputation: 422
Quote:
Originally Posted by camping! View Post
Sooo, what how does McVeigh and the Weather Underground differ?
They don't. They both had/have idiots who idolize/whitewash thier actions. That cannot be denied.
Very true.

I would go a step farther and say they weren't idiots, but lunatics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2009, 07:35 AM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
53,082 posts, read 34,900,300 times
Reputation: 29479
Quote:
Originally Posted by TXboomerang View Post
I would begin by saying that only one person from the 2 extremist mentioned launched the political career of a president in their living room. That same person is lovingly accepted by much of the left now. McVeigh however was a recluse and complete loner who was completely denounced for his actions by the right wing.

So one of the extremist lived on to be popular among liberals, the other experienced capital punishment and was never liked by conservatives.
+1 for you my friend, excellent points. mcveigh is despised by the right, the vile and repulsive ayers is lauded, defended, and praised by the left.
go figure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2009, 07:42 AM
 
Location: PA
5,562 posts, read 5,696,237 times
Reputation: 1962
Underground weathermen - to achieve "the destruction of US imperialism and achieve a classless world: world communism

Tim McVeigh - The government is afraid of the guns people have because they have to have control of the people at all times. Once you take away the guns, you can do anything to the people. You give them an inch and they take a mile. I believe we are slowly turning into a socialist government. The government is continually growing bigger and more powerful, and the people need to prepare to defend themselves against government control.
Those who betray or subvert the Constitution are guilty of sedition and/or treason, are domestic enemies and should and will be punished accordingly.
It also stands to reason that anyone who sympathizes with the enemy or gives aid or comfort to said enemy is likewise guilty. I have sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and I will. And I will because not only did I swear to, but I believe in what it stands for in every bit of my heart, soul and being.


Which one of these is closer to the first terrorists this country had "the founding fathers?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2009, 07:58 AM
 
Location: 95468
1,382 posts, read 2,390,931 times
Reputation: 944
A better comparison would be Gore/Kacynski.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2009, 08:07 AM
 
13,685 posts, read 20,843,999 times
Reputation: 7692
Interesting comparison.

Some things in common:

A willingness to use violence, hatred of the State, an ability to turn the conscience off, and perhaps most notably, a very deep sense of (perverse or negative) Romanticism.

Differences:

Class- The WU, like their counterparts in Europe, pretty much came from middle class, college educated backgrounds. McVeigh came from more of a lower class background.

While both had the same 'enemy', so to speak, they probably would have found each other's ultimate goal horrifying.

McVeigh was obviously willing to take it further than the Weathermen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top