Quote:
Originally Posted by rkb0305
![OK](https://pics3.city-data.com/forum/images/smilies/oglvvd.gif) The middle class wouldn't need a tax break if they'd been fairly compensated in the first place!
|
Who are you to judge what is competitive globally?
Just pay people higher wages without employer consequences? Your company might be out of business if they couldn't compete. They also pay a large portion of your health insurance. When you consider that - you earn much more per hour than you think.
Most corporations earn enough profits that they can afford to pay CEO's handsomely. Most are hired for their credentials and experience in a certain field.
The tax cut you speak of will not amount to much. If you haven't noticed, prices have been going up. The point is that you will buy $8 more a week at your grocery store, you will see 8 extra bucks in your paycheck. The problem is, that since prices have increased 14% over the last quarter, your extra $8 per week will get you the same amount of groceries you usually buy. And the price of gas is also expected to rise again. Higher energy costs also effect employers.
So we wouldn't need a tax cut if only we got paid more. Look, I don't earn tons of money. The reason? Because I don't deserve it. I didn't go to medical school, I didn't go to law school. I do have college in my portfolio, but, you have to decide what you want to do in life.
Some professions pay more than others. I'ts all up to you.
I'm not saying that one thing is better than another. I'm just saying that if you're dissatisfied with your earnings, don't blame your employer. You chose to work there, and you agreed to the wage.