Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-05-2009, 08:10 PM
 
Location: West, Southwest, East & Northeast
3,463 posts, read 7,307,742 times
Reputation: 871

Advertisements

WOW! Obama drops charges against USS Cole al-Qaida bomber!

WASHINGTON - The Pentagon's senior judge overseeing terror trials at Guantanamo Bay dropped charges Thursday against an al-Qaida suspect in the 2000 USS Cole bombing, upholding President Barak Obama's order to freeze military tribunals there. The charges against suspected al-Qaida bomber Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri marked the last active Guantanamo war crimes case.

Charges dropped in USS Cole trial - Guantanamo- msnbc.com

Obama should be ridiculed by every U.S. military man and woman. He's a worthless human being and is proving to be a travesty for all Americans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-05-2009, 08:12 PM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,164,267 times
Reputation: 6195
The Pentagon's senior judge overseeing terror trials at Guantanamo Bay dropped charges Thursday against an al-Qaida suspect in the 2000 USS Cole bombing, upholding President Barak Obama's order to freeze military tribunals there. The charges against suspected al-Qaida bomber Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri marked the last active Guantanamo war crimes case.

The legal move by Susan J. Crawford, the top legal authority for military trials at Guantanamo, brings all cases into compliance with Obama's Jan. 22 executive order to halt terrorist court proceedings at the U.S. Navy base in Cuba.

Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said Crawford dismissed the charges against al-Nashiri without prejudice. That means new charges can be brought again later. He will remain in prison for the time being.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2009, 08:14 PM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,164,267 times
Reputation: 6195
Why do you say "Obama drops charges"? Your headline is misleading.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2009, 08:23 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,956,928 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Why do you say "Obama drops charges"? Your headline is misleading.
Charges were dropped in response to obama's EO.

Unbelievable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2009, 08:28 PM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,164,267 times
Reputation: 6195
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Charges were dropped in response to obama's EO.

Unbelievable.
Unbelievable because not true. the article is hard to understand maybe, but it means that with this action she "brings all cases into compliance with Obama's Jan. 22 executive order to halt terrorist court proceedings at the U.S. Navy base in Cuba." "The charges against suspected al-Qaida bomber Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri marked the last active Guantanamo war crimes case." In other words this was the last case in the lot that needed to be halted, and her dropping charges halted it.

Also note (again) that she "dismissed the charges against al-Nashiri without prejudice. That means new charges can be brought again later. He will remain in prison for the time being."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2009, 08:29 PM
 
Location: Greenville, SC
5,238 posts, read 8,794,997 times
Reputation: 2647
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
That means new charges can be brought again later. He will remain in prison for the time being.
Thread ended.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2009, 08:30 PM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,164,267 times
Reputation: 6195
This is what Im talking about. When you claim things that arent true people believe them.

Last edited by Reads2MUCH; 02-06-2009 at 05:50 PM.. Reason: reference to user
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2009, 08:31 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,827,269 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
Why do you say "Obama drops charges"? Your headline is misleading.
Cut him/her some slack... only a messenger from right wing propaganda machine.

Last edited by Reads2MUCH; 02-06-2009 at 05:51 PM.. Reason: reference to user
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2009, 08:32 PM
 
Location: New Mexico
8,396 posts, read 9,445,226 times
Reputation: 4070
Default Obama drops charges against USS Cole al-Qaida bomber!

The Cole was bombed in October of 2000, a month before Bush and Cheney were elected.

Wonder why they couldn't get anything done against this guy in 8 years?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2009, 09:16 PM
 
Location: Southern California
15,080 posts, read 20,479,858 times
Reputation: 10343
Reading the article (which I hope everyone will do):

Quote:
The legal move by Susan J. Crawford, the top legal authority for military trials at Guantanamo, brings all cases into compliance with Obama's Jan. 22 executive order to halt terrorist court proceedings at the U.S. Navy base in Cuba.

Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said Crawford dismissed the charges against al-Nashiri without prejudice. That means new charges can be brought again later. He will remain in prison for the time being.
Fair enough. The man is not free and he can still be prosecuted and, if found guilty, convicted.

Quote:
The Pentagon last summer charged al-Nashiri, a Saudi Arabian, with "organizing and directing" the bombing and planned to seek the death penalty in the case.
If he's guilty they will kill him. No problem there.

Quote:
...
The ruling also gives the White House time to review the legal cases of all 245 terror suspects held there and decide...

...where — or whether — to prosecute the suspects who have been held there for years, most without charges.
Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri was captured in November, 2002. So for about 8 years legal proceedings were on hold. Understandibly, the victims' families are angry. However, if there is anyone to blame, it is the Bush Administration for sitting on this case for so long and letting the victim's families wait. If this guy is guilty (and in this DEMOCRACY you're innocent until proven guilty) and there is evidence to prove it, then prosecute him - don't sit on him for 8 years...

Quote:
Crawford was appointed to her post in 2007 by then-President George W. Bush. She was in the news last month when she said interrogation methods used on one suspect at Guantanamo amounted to torture.
...
Well, at least we know she wasn't an Obama appointee.

Last edited by MIKEETC; 02-05-2009 at 09:32 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top