Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I stated in the OP that I don't know. You offer a real possibility. Are you saying you do know for a fact, or is that merely conjecture on your part...?
you stated it as fact, in both the title and your text.
And I suppose you feel that cover yourself with "Anybody know anything...?"
if you spent as much time searching Twitter, and realizing the parodies (like this https://twitter.com/Ginni_Thomas/sta...85309425868800 ) as you did breathlessly rushing to start this fake news topic, then you'd realize it makes you look stupid.
And if, as you wished, it was real and Twitter actually suspended Thomas for reasons you perceive as justified, then why would they (do you think) suspend Sotomayor if she actually had an account?
And if the justices actually had Twitter accounts, don't you think Twitter would have "verified" (blue checked) them?
This popped up in my Twitter feed yesterday afternoon. Both of Clarence Thomas' Twitter accounts have been suspended, SCOTUS and personal. There has been nothing on any of the news sites.
Anybody know anything...?
I am not aware any SCOTUS Justice has a Twitter account.
you stated it as fact, in both the title and your text.
And I suppose you feel that cover yourself with "Anybody know anything...?"
if you spent as much time searching Twitter, and realizing the parodies (like this https://twitter.com/Ginni_Thomas/sta...85309425868800 ) as you did breathlessly rushing to start this fake news topic, then you'd realize it makes you look stupid.
And if, as you wished, it was real and Twitter actually suspended Thomas for reasons you perceive as justified, then why would they (do you think) suspend Sotomayor if she actually had an account?
And if the justices actually had Twitter accounts, don't you think Twitter would have "verified" (blue checked) them?
I already said you had a valid point. Don't be snotty.
you stated it as fact, in both the title and your text.
And I suppose you feel that cover yourself with "Anybody know anything...?"
if you spent as much time searching Twitter, and realizing the parodies (like this https://twitter.com/Ginni_Thomas/sta...85309425868800 ) as you did breathlessly rushing to start this fake news topic, then you'd realize it makes you look stupid.
And if, as you wished, it was real and Twitter actually suspended Thomas for reasons you perceive as justified, then why would they (do you think) suspend Sotomayor if she actually had an account?
And if the justices actually had Twitter accounts, don't you think Twitter would have "verified" (blue checked) them?
Why research when government can tell the poster what to say and think?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
