Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-04-2022, 07:37 AM
 
19,120 posts, read 27,724,944 times
Reputation: 20295

Advertisements

Audience: Individuals Performing COVID-19 Testing
Level: Laboratory Alert
After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.
Visit the FDA website for a list of authorized COVID-19 diagnostic methods. For a summary of the performance of FDA-authorized molecular methods with an FDA reference panel, visit this page.
In preparation for this change, CDC recommends clinical laboratories and testing sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay select and begin their transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test. CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. Such assays can facilitate continued testing for both influenza and SARS-CoV-2 and can save both time and resources as we head into influenza season. Laboratories and testing sites should validate and verify their selected assay within their facility before beginning clinical testing.


https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2...Testing_1.html


Please, pay attention to the balded! They just admitted that PCRs are not reliable differentiation method!!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-04-2022, 07:39 AM
 
19,120 posts, read 27,724,944 times
Reputation: 20295
Who was it here that chastised me with "PCR tests are highly precise COVID diagnostic tests" scientific article?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2022, 07:42 AM
 
Location: NMB, SC
43,372 posts, read 18,477,138 times
Reputation: 35132
Those PCR tests were repurposed for covid and have a pretty big margin for error...20% per the FDA.

I put those PCR tests right up there with the "95% effective" vaccine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2022, 07:44 AM
 
Location: Sector 001
15,949 posts, read 12,328,655 times
Reputation: 16124
Interesting how the narrative is now being pushed to get back to work. I guess they got all the QE and pork they think they need and now they want to fix the supply chain realizing that no amount of liquidity will matter if there are supply chain problems. Back to work lemmings.

It's almost like someone higher up the food chain controls what the entire media thinks and says...you'd think they'd be screaming for more lockdowns and stimulus checks still with the case counts as they are.
How long until they get rid of the 10 day quarantine for symptomatic cases or reduce it to simply being off when you feel really bad? Well it is an endemic virus that is at it's most contagious often before people even feel symptoms just like all coronaviruses have always behaved... By the time you know you have it, you probably already gave it to someone else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2022, 07:47 AM
 
6,011 posts, read 2,259,858 times
Reputation: 4656
Quote:
"CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses."
This changes how patients are screened by cutting both resources and patient swabs in half, it is still using PCR testing for BOTH Covid and Flu.

You only need to swab the patient once, use one slot on the lab machine, only need one reagent pack (remember when we ran out of reagent for the test in 2020?), and both results are reported to the healthcare provider or test taker at once.

This is literally stated in the first post if you understand the context of what your reading, OP interpreted the information incorrectly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2022, 07:49 AM
 
Location: NMB, SC
43,372 posts, read 18,477,138 times
Reputation: 35132
Quote:
Originally Posted by sholomar View Post
Interesting how the narrative is now being pushed to get back to work. I guess they got all the QE and pork they think they need and now they want to fix the supply chain realizing that no amount of liquidity will matter if there are supply chain problems. Back to work lemmings.

It's almost like someone higher up the food chain controls what the entire media thinks and says...you'd think they'd be screaming for more lockdowns and stimulus checks still with the case count as it is.
Oh they will continue to milk this virus but they need people working now because the Federal Reserve cannot create any more money to put into the economy.

Can't do any more QE....the Fed tapped themselves out at $12 trillion and now need to get it back somehow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2022, 07:50 AM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,831 posts, read 34,710,167 times
Reputation: 29368
Quote:
Originally Posted by ukrkoz View Post
Audience: Individuals Performing COVID-19 Testing
Level: Laboratory Alert
After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.
Visit the FDA website for a list of authorized COVID-19 diagnostic methods. For a summary of the performance of FDA-authorized molecular methods with an FDA reference panel, visit this page.
In preparation for this change, CDC recommends clinical laboratories and testing sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay select and begin their transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test. CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. Such assays can facilitate continued testing for both influenza and SARS-CoV-2 and can save both time and resources as we head into influenza season. Laboratories and testing sites should validate and verify their selected assay within their facility before beginning clinical testing.


https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2...Testing_1.html


Please, pay attention to the balded! They just admitted that PCRs are not reliable differentiation method!!!!!
right. because the current method is not multiplexed to detect flu. they're not even attempting to detect flu viruses with a covid-specific test

Quote:
CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2022, 07:52 AM
 
Location: NMB, SC
43,372 posts, read 18,477,138 times
Reputation: 35132
Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga View Post
right. because the current method is not multiplexed to detect flu. they're not even attempting to detect flu with a covid test
That's probably why no one had the flu last year...they all tested positive for covid instead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2022, 07:53 AM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,831 posts, read 34,710,167 times
Reputation: 29368
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMSRetired View Post
Those PCR tests were repurposed for covid and have a pretty big margin for error...20% per the FDA.

I put those PCR tests right up there with the "95% effective" vaccine.
all PCR tests are 'repurposed' for the target of interest. can you share this 20% error rate information?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TMSRetired View Post
That's probably why no one had the flu last year...they all tested positive for covid instead.
no. the covid PCR assay can not detect flu viruses and was never intended to even try.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2022, 07:53 AM
 
Location: New Jersey and hating it
12,200 posts, read 7,253,606 times
Reputation: 17474
Quote:
Originally Posted by ukrkoz View Post
Who was it here that chastised me with "PCR tests are highly precise COVID diagnostic tests" scientific article?
Not sure but I have my bets on that it was a Leftist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top