Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
More people believe the Laffer curve than disbelieve it.
It is fact that at some tax rate, overall tax revenues fall. Do you agree with that?
If the tax rate was 100% would you continue to work?
Have you looked at what happened in France between ~2010-2017 when taxes got jacked to rates as high as 75%, and the overall tax haul plummeted? So, higher tax rates = lower tax revenues
When many of us add up all the taxes we pay. Fed, State and Local Income Tax, Property Tax, Real Estate Tax, Gasoline Tax, Sales Tax, other Energy Taxes, Capital Gains Tax, and several others, we are already well above 50% of our income. To me that is Indentured Servitude.
When you are forced to hand over more than half of your income to government in which you trade your time (life) in order to earn, that is not right.
Taxes are levied to pay the bills of the government. How much do we need to do that?
That is necessary to give an answer to your question.
Isnt is better to maximize the tax haul, and then try to live w/in that budget?
Using your line of thought...what if America "needs" $4T/year to "pay the bills of the government", but $4T in taxes cannot be achieved?
Then, we need to make spending cuts right?
Why not determine what is the max tax haul we can achieve is, and then formulate our budget around that?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.