Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They said Trump stole the election but it was clear that Hillary would have lost without collusion to cover up her scandals.
They could have won with Bernie but sabotaged his campaign and he took a bribe to shut his mouth and go away. They have nobody but themselves to blame, they put Trump in office.
Icy Tea had a far better chance of winning that election than Bernie Sanders did. Trump would have won by far greater numbers had good ol' Bernie been the competition.
Just be grateful that the final results were that we got a real president, one who has and is making America Great Again. We are all benefiting from his presidency, even the dems who hate him and won't admit to his successes. Think how really great it could be with some cooperation.
Judicial Watch announced today that it uncovered 422 pages of FBI documents showing evidence of “cover-up” discussions related to the Clinton email system within Platte River Networks, one of the vendors who managed the Clinton email system. The documents also show Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) Charles McCullough forwarding “concerns” about classified information in former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails.
Fitton: Obama State Dept Conspiracy Against Trump?
" Victoria Nuland, President Obama’s assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian Affairs from September 2013 until January 2017, has been linked to the notorious anti-Trump dossier fabricated by Hillary Clinton’s opposition research firm.
The author of the dossier, Christopher Steele, reportedly had developed long-standing relationships with senior State Department officials, including Nuland. “Between 2014 and 2016, Steele authored more than a hundred reports on Russia and Ukraine. These were written for a private client but shared widely within the State Department and sent up to Secretary of State John Kerry and to Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, who was in charge of the U.S. response to the Ukraine crisis.”
They said Trump stole the election but it was clear that Hillary would have lost without collusion to cover up her scandals.
They could have won with Bernie but sabotaged his campaign and he took a bribe to shut his mouth and go away. They have nobody but themselves to blame, they put Trump in office.
That would be the long and short of it.
Those 77,744 swing votes in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin that gave Trump the election were not Republicans.
They were Democrats and Independent who couldn't stomach Billary.
Those 77,744 Democrats and Independents did not vote for Trump, rather they voted against Billary.
Had Bernie been the candidate, those 77,744 Democrats and Independents would have voted for Bernie.
Having said that, not much would be different, because the Republican House and Senate wouldn't give Bernie a blank check to do whatever he wants.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tominftl
Post credible sources. Right wing rags don’t count as a credible source.
Judicial Watch is not a "right wing rag."
Judicial Watch is a non-partisan organization that attacks government corruption.
Judicial Watch repeated filed dozens of law suits against the Bush Administration.
It's thanks to Judicial Watch's efforts that we have maps of Iraqi oil fields. And, we have a list of oil and oil service companies bidding on Iraqi oil and natural gas fields, that did not include US or British oil companies, although, as I pointed out, I believe one of the companies was an MI-6 front company and one was possibly a CIA front company.
And, thanks to Judicial Watch, we have the meeting minutes and notes from Cheney's secret meetings with US oil company executives.
We have a lot of other things that the Bush Administration wasn't forth-coming about, either, thanks to Judicial Watch.
Like White House visitor logs and meetings.
How, exactly, did the US know the Iranians were contemplating a nuclear weapons program?
The Iranians told Bush.
The Iranian delegation to the UN came to the White House to talk to Bush. Apparently, they were seeking elimination of at least some sanctions and to improve relations between the US and Iran, but Bush wouldn't have none of that.
Anyway, Judicial Watch is a good organization who isn't even remotely partisan, they're just looking for the truth, which is to your advantage.
Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it has received the first batch of documents from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) regarding congressional “Torture Briefings.” The CIA produced the documents pursuant to a previous court order in Judicial Watch’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the CIA. The court order stipulates that documents pertaining to congressional briefings on “enhanced interrogation techniques” must be provided to Judicial Watch by April 15.
Judicial Watch previously obtained documents from former Vice President Cheney’s office in a separate lawsuit.
JW doesn't use anonymous 'sources.' It publishes the actual documents for readers to decide for themselves what they mean. Lazy leftists find it easier to kill the messenger. It's not JW's fault that government, D and R, stonewalls every effort to release information, nor should they be expected to do all the heavy lifting.
Being you challenge every thing Judicial Watch said, why don't YOU PROVE what the say is NOT true instead of just attacking them?
Remember what they are say is DIRECTLY FROM FOIA RECORDS.
If you are going trash some one at least have the courage and honesty to BACK IT UP.
If Not we will think of you the way you think of them, ""A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is FAKE NEWS.
"Here's another question for you. If the Republican's controlled the house for 6 years under Obama and two years into Trump's presidency, and the Senate had a Republican majority since 2015, how come they did nothing about Clinton all of those years? What do you make of Jeff Session's saying that "there is insufficient basis to launch a special investigation of Hillary Clinton." Source Independent: Jeff Session's admits there is not enough evidence for the FBI to investigate Hillary Clinton."
You are mixing a LOT of thngs together.
ALL of the hillary email scandal, which is WHAT WE ARE talking about happened UNDER THE OBAMA ADMIN, with HIS PEOPLE RUNNING the intelligence an legal agencies, AND was DISCOVERED BY THE REPUBS because of the Benghazi hearings. So going back in the past is just an attempt to distort from the truth and on the verge of hijacking the tread.
Bbbuuuttt Hillary. That's all we've been hearing from the right for three years now, right. One conspiracy theory after another. Rinse and repeat for the look over there president. I'm sorry if my mixing a lot of things together is too complex for your simple look over there agenda. "What they say..." Who is they? Judicial Watch? Yeah right, I'll believe every thing "they say" because it's about as credible as the Enquirer. Lets be fair, okay lets. Facts are facts and fantasy is fantasy. When you understand the difference, we can have an intelligent fact based conversation.
Here's the bottom line. Three years into Trump's presidency and no lock her up. It should make you think.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
JW
