Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-18-2019, 05:46 AM
 
Location: Central Washington
1,663 posts, read 894,073 times
Reputation: 2941

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Lead View Post
Then it must be an amount that supports your position

So, is that A LOT
or just a little?
More than enough to cause over 70,000 overdose deaths in 2017 alone, and the death rate is 3.5 times higher than 20 years ago. Sounds an awful lot like a national emergency.

Quote:
“Another year of increasing numbers of drug overdose deaths is a national emergency, that can’t be overstated,” said John Auerbach, President and C.E.O. of the Trust for America’s Health
https://www.usnews.com/news/national...record-in-2017
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-18-2019, 05:49 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,336 posts, read 16,538,799 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by dozerbear View Post
More than enough to cause over 70,000 overdose deaths in 2017 alone, and the death rate is 3.5 times higher than 20 years ago. Sounds an awful lot like a national emergency.

https://www.usnews.com/news/national...record-in-2017
Because those drugs couldn't be comprised of shipments that simply successfully made it through legal ports of entry?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2019, 05:52 AM
 
59,543 posts, read 27,851,679 times
Reputation: 14425
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
Stephen Miller owned Chris Wallace on his own program Fox News Sunday crushing Wallace's anti-Trump narrative.


Stephen Miller made the case upending Wallace on every point. Wallace use old data to try and make the case of what is relevant today. Facts at one time were correct but that no longer represent the problems or situation today.

Wallace tried to use the constitutional argument selectively and it backfired big time.
Stephen correctly pointed out the false premise of Wallace's question.

https://video.foxnews.com/v/6003160755001
"crushing Wallace's anti-Trump narrative."

For those who never watch FOX, as they claim but seem to know what is on it, I have NEVER thought of Wallace a republican much less conservative.

He has been anti Trump from the beginning.

Glad to see someone call him on it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2019, 06:04 AM
 
Location: Posting from my space yacht.
8,444 posts, read 4,801,917 times
Reputation: 15354
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
"crushing Wallace's anti-Trump narrative."

For those who never watch FOX, as they claim but seem to know what is on it, I have NEVER thought of Wallace a republican much less conservative.

He has been anti Trump from the beginning.

Glad to see someone call him on it.
It seems to me his bias is more towards the establishment in general than any specific party, which makes him appear to lean conservative at times to anyone used to hearing journalists with a more pronounced left leaning bent. Trump is anything but establishment so Wallace is not sympathetic to his cause.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2019, 06:16 AM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,336 posts, read 16,538,799 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
"crushing Wallace's anti-Trump narrative."

For those who never watch FOX, as they claim but seem to know what is on it, I have NEVER thought of Wallace a republican much less conservative.

He has been anti Trump from the beginning.

Glad to see someone call him on it.


So support of Trump is your measure of being a "real conservative"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2019, 06:18 AM
 
52,430 posts, read 26,903,825 times
Reputation: 21098
Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
Stephen Miller is crazy -- just saying.

He put together a political campaign that took down two political dynasties. - Bush & Clinton. Between the two of them 5 Presidential wins.

Put the leftists & never trumpers in a state of shock because their teevee inspired view of reality turned out to be false. Such a red pill.

That's why you really don't like him.


-- just saying.





(Wallace is over rated. He wouldn't be where he is now without his dad.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2019, 07:13 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,856 posts, read 25,732,966 times
Reputation: 24780
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
Yet he bested what some consider one of the best in media. What does that tell ya ?
It tells me this.

Loud n' clear.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2019, 07:20 AM
 
8,326 posts, read 3,998,497 times
Reputation: 10709
Trump's dream puppet - I could almost see the strings. You could not find a better propaganda parrot than Miller, that's for sure. If Trump is ever going to prevail with his fascist agenda - he's going to need more guys like this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2019, 07:33 AM
 
7,412 posts, read 2,742,175 times
Reputation: 7783
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
Wallace followed up with the Rush segment. Notice he ask Rush the same question he ask Miller on the constitutionality of the national emer. or EO, as if he was expecting Rush to bale him out. Rush didn't bale him out, he straightened him out.
Wallace is smart enough to know the constitution isn't the document it was on the day it was signed hundreds of years ago. Its the 10 pounds of paper that change it with legislation and SCOTUS rulings and opinions to what it is today. Wallace's line of questioning was all false premise to appeal to the knuckle draggers in the lefts collective.

Here is the Rush segment. Included b/c it deals with Wallace's continuing the same ideas as was addressed with Miller but goes into more depth.

https://video.foxnews.com/v/6003164394001

You should stick to interpreting the Конституция.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2019, 07:36 AM
 
13,857 posts, read 5,109,879 times
Reputation: 9905
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riley. View Post
Say what you will, most drug runners are NOT coming through a port of entry with their contraband. Be serious.
You know this how? You could be right, but what drives me nuts on this forum is all the people making claims with no data or supporting evidence. But that's how Trump operates so, monkey see monkey do, i guess.

Anyway here's a link with some actual data:

https://www.politifact.com/new-york/...ts-entry-lowe/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top