Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-14-2018, 09:46 AM
 
29,561 posts, read 14,708,717 times
Reputation: 14485

Advertisements

Here we go with more "common sense" gun reform from the asshats on the left. Hopefully this bill doesn't get off the floor.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-.../7115/text?r=1
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-14-2018, 09:51 AM
 
Location: Chicago
937 posts, read 928,778 times
Reputation: 531
A law that puts an embargo on 3d printed guns sounds reasonable to me since there's nothing on the books yet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2018, 09:52 AM
 
1,239 posts, read 511,590 times
Reputation: 922
Quote:
Originally Posted by scarabchuck View Post
Here we go with more "common sense" gun reform from the asshats on the left. Hopefully this bill doesn't get off the floor.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-.../7115/text?r=1
What do you find so wrong about this proposal? It's not taking anyone's guns, or making it harder to get guns.

From what I can tell, it's attempting to limit the ability to import certain gun parts, and it wants hommemade guns to require a serial # in order to be legal.

Common Sense is the greatest enemy of those with no sense at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2018, 09:59 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,130,615 times
Reputation: 8527
Quote:
Originally Posted by scarabchuck View Post
Here we go with more "common sense" gun reform from the asshats on the left. Hopefully this bill doesn't get off the floor.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-.../7115/text?r=1
What about this bill do you find threatening?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2018, 10:02 AM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,131 posts, read 41,338,442 times
Reputation: 45226
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
What about this bill do you find threatening?
What about this bill is going to keep anyone from being murdered?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2018, 10:04 AM
 
29,561 posts, read 14,708,717 times
Reputation: 14485
To prohibit the sale, acquisition, distribution in commerce, or import into the United States of certain firearm receiver castings or blanks, assault weapon parts kits, and machinegun parts kits and the marketing or advertising of such castings or blanks and kits on any medium of electronic communications, to require homemade firearms to have serial numbers, and for other purposes.


What is a "assault weapon parts kit" ? Need a clear definition of that one.
What is a "machinegun parts kit" ? And what makes it different than an assault weapons kit ?


Currently semi auto rifles are not required to be registered , so why make an 80% receiver kit illegal ?


This is nothing more than a backdoor attempt of a ban on AR's. Particularly ones that are assembled at home. Just curious, how many deaths have we had with non registered "homemade" firearms ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2018, 10:08 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,343 posts, read 54,470,554 times
Reputation: 40756
Quote:
Originally Posted by scarabchuck View Post
Here we go with more "common sense" gun reform from the asshats on the left. Hopefully this bill doesn't get off the floor.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-.../7115/text?r=1

Maybe it was just an attempt to torque up the asshats on the right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2018, 10:10 AM
 
29,561 posts, read 14,708,717 times
Reputation: 14485
Quote:
Originally Posted by scarabchuck View Post
To prohibit the sale, acquisition, distribution in commerce, or import into the United States of certain firearm receiver castings or blanks, assault weapon parts kits, and machinegun parts kits and the marketing or advertising of such castings or blanks and kits on any medium of electronic communications, to require homemade firearms to have serial numbers, and for other purposes.


What is a "assault weapon parts kit" ? Need a clear definition of that one.
What is a "machinegun parts kit" ? And what makes it different than an assault weapons kit ?


Currently semi auto rifles are not required to be registered , so why make an 80% receiver kit illegal ?


This is nothing more than a backdoor attempt of a ban on AR's. Particularly ones that are assembled at home. Just curious, how many deaths have we had with non registered "homemade" firearms ?

Seems to me this targets all semi auto rifles and and pistol length versions. I don't understand the .22 rimfire call out. So this bill doesn't not pertain to , carbine models, or another other rimfire caliber? So .22 is unlawful, but I can have a .50bmg ?




(a) Terms.—For purposes of this Act—
[LEFT](1) the term “ammunition feeding device” means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device, but does not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition, and an ammunition feeding device shall be considered detachable if the device can be removed from a firearm without disassembly of the firearm action;


(2) the term “assault weapon parts kit” means any part or combination of parts designed and intended to enable a consumer who possesses all such necessary parts to assemble a semiautomatic assault weapon;


(3) the term “machinegun parts kit” means any part or combination of parts designed and intended to enable a consumer who possesses all such necessary parts to assemble a machinegun or convert a firearm into a machinegun;[/LEFT]



(4) the term “semiautomatic assault weapon” means—
(A) a semiautomatic rifle or semiautomatic shotgun that has the capacity to accept a detachable ammunition feeding device; or



(B) a semiautomatic pistol that has—
(i) the capacity to accept a detachable ammunition feeding device; and


(ii) any one of the features described in subsection (b);






[LEFT](5) the term “machinegun” has the meaning given such term in section 5845(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986;


(6) the term “semiautomatic pistol” means any repeating pistol that utilizes a portion of the energy of a firing cartridge to extract the fixed cartridge case and chamber the next round and requires a separate pull of the trigger to fire each cartridge;


(7) the term “semiautomatic rifle” has the meaning given such term in section 921(a)(28) of title 18, United States Code; and


(8) the term “semiautomatic shotgun” means any repeating shotgun that utilizes a portion of the energy of a firing cartridge to extract the fixed cartridge case and chamber the next round and requires a separate pull of a trigger to fire each cartridge.[/LEFT]



(b) Special features of a semiautomatic pistol.—The special features described in subsection (a)(3)(B)(ii) are—
[LEFT](1) an ammunition magazine that attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip;


(2) a threaded barrel capable of accepting a barrel extender, flash suppressor, forward handgrip, or silencer;


(3) a shroud that is attached to, or partially or completely encircles, the barrel and that permits the shooter to hold the firearm with the nontrigger hand without being burned;


(4) a second hand grip;


(5) a manufactured weight of 50 ounces or more when the pistol is unloaded; and


(6) a semiautomatic version of an automatic firearm.[/LEFT]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2018, 10:12 AM
 
1,515 posts, read 1,227,231 times
Reputation: 1632
Another bill that will do NOTHING, not one damn thing, to affect violent crime or criminals but will impose a hardship or make criminals out of otherwise law abiding citizens.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2018, 10:12 AM
 
29,561 posts, read 14,708,717 times
Reputation: 14485
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Maybe it was just an attempt to torque up the asshats on the right.

Fair enough, I've been called worse and fully admit to being an *******. I was born this way...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top