Nyt

[HockeyMac18]

Originally Posted by phma

The "failing" Nyt ? Maybe ?

1) They're not failing.
Shares of New York Times surge after subscriber growth
New York Times subscription growth soars tenfold after Donald Trump wins presidency
NY Times subscriptions doubled in 2016 | TheHill

Print is definitely dying, but the NYTimes are a showing themselves to be a successful example of how to make that transition from print to new media.



2) What do yo want to discuss about them? The OP is rather lacking in specific details.

[steven_h]

Originally Posted by phma

The "failing" Nyt ? Maybe ?

EXACTLY!

Just trying to figure them out... I'm a businessman ...why would I go out of my way to screw it up? That's all I'm asking.


Why is the NYT going out of their way? IT MAKES NO SENSE

[HockeyMac18]

Originally Posted by steven_h

EXACTLY!

Just trying to figure them out... I'm a businessman ...why would I go out of my way to screw it up? That's all I'm asking.


Why is the NYT going out of their way? IT MAKES NO SENSE

Same response to you:

Originally Posted by HockeyMac18

1) They're not failing.
Shares of New York Times surge after subscriber growth
New York Times subscription growth soars tenfold after Donald Trump wins presidency
NY Times subscriptions doubled in 2016 | TheHill

Print is definitely dying, but the NYTimes are a showing themselves to be a successful example of how to make that transition from print to new media.



2) What do yo want to discuss about them? The OP is rather lacking in specific details.

[carolac]

You're right. "Selective exposure" is definitely working now for papers and news.

Nobody seems to mind that they don't get their facts correct: NYT issues correction to Giffords editorial | TheHill

True journalism is very dead, but hate is selling good.

Originally Posted by HockeyMac18

1) They're not failing.
Shares of New York Times surge after subscriber growth
New York Times subscription growth soars tenfold after Donald Trump wins presidency
NY Times subscriptions doubled in 2016 | TheHill

Print is definitely dying, but the NYTimes are a showing themselves to be a successful example of how to make that transition from print to new media.



2) What do yo want to discuss about them? Your OP is rather lacking in specific details.

[TreeBeard]

NYT's is among the best newspaper in the USA and in the world, despite what conservative ideologues say. Of course, they condemn it, while at the same time quoting it. (At least the smarter ones do). Even the Deadbeat Don wants the approval of the NYTs and when he doesn't get it he lashes out. So like a child.

[HockeyMac18]

Originally Posted by carolac

You're right. "Selective exposure" is definitely working now for papers and news.

Nobody seems to mind that they don't get their facts correct: NYT issues correction to Giffords editorial | TheHill

True journalism is very dead, but hate is selling good.

So is the argument that the NYTimes is failing? I thought that was what the thread topic was about? It is clearly not, by the way.

[Steve McDonald]

Originally Posted by greywar

*reads title*

Its spelled nyet!

Or spelled, Нет!

[Goodnight]

Originally Posted by steven_h

Are they trying to be fools? Trying to go under?


What's their glitch?

So try the WSJ.


Curious regarding which article put you over the top.